Dimensional alterations following vertical ridge augmentation using collagen membrane and three types of bone grafting materials

A retrospective observational study

Yun Ho Park, Seongho Choi, Kyoo Sung Cho, Jung Seok Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Various biomaterials have been introduced for vertical ridge augmentation to replace autogenous block bone grafting. Purpose: This retrospective study radiographically evaluated dimensional alterations of the vertically augmented alveolar ridge using collagen membrane and 3 types of materials: autogenous bone block, allogenous bone block, and particulated bone substitute. Materials and methods: The electronic medical records of 32 patients who received vertical ridge augmentation using 3 types of materials were searched: 9 for autogenous bone block, 12 for allogenous bone block, and 11 for particulated bone substitutes. The vertical bone gain, progression of bone resorption, and peri-implant marginal bone loss after prosthetic loading were measured on follow-up radiographs. Results: The alveolar ridge was vertically augmented by 5.13 ± 1.61, 4.54 ± 2.48, and 3.90 ± 0.85 mm (mean ± standard deviation) after grafting with autogenous bone block, allogenous bone block, and particulated bone substitute, respectively. The radiographic vertical height of the augmented ridge that received autogenous bone block reduced continuously during the first year but was stable thereafter. Sites that received allogenous bone block or particulated bone substitute exhibited dimensional shrinkage for up to 1.5 years postsurgery. However, the peri-implant marginal bone loss did not exceed 1 mm throughout the observational periods in all groups. Conclusions: The clinical findings of this study suggest that the alveolar ridge can be vertically augmented using either allogenous bone block or particulated bone substitute. However, they require a longer healing period to ensure dimensional stability compared to the autogenous bone block.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-749
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Bone Transplantation
Observational Studies
Collagen
Retrospective Studies
Bone and Bones
Membranes
Bone Substitutes
Alveolar Process
Electronic Health Records
Biocompatible Materials
Bone Resorption

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{6b068327575449038299fb90015d28f0,
title = "Dimensional alterations following vertical ridge augmentation using collagen membrane and three types of bone grafting materials: A retrospective observational study",
abstract = "Background: Various biomaterials have been introduced for vertical ridge augmentation to replace autogenous block bone grafting. Purpose: This retrospective study radiographically evaluated dimensional alterations of the vertically augmented alveolar ridge using collagen membrane and 3 types of materials: autogenous bone block, allogenous bone block, and particulated bone substitute. Materials and methods: The electronic medical records of 32 patients who received vertical ridge augmentation using 3 types of materials were searched: 9 for autogenous bone block, 12 for allogenous bone block, and 11 for particulated bone substitutes. The vertical bone gain, progression of bone resorption, and peri-implant marginal bone loss after prosthetic loading were measured on follow-up radiographs. Results: The alveolar ridge was vertically augmented by 5.13 ± 1.61, 4.54 ± 2.48, and 3.90 ± 0.85 mm (mean ± standard deviation) after grafting with autogenous bone block, allogenous bone block, and particulated bone substitute, respectively. The radiographic vertical height of the augmented ridge that received autogenous bone block reduced continuously during the first year but was stable thereafter. Sites that received allogenous bone block or particulated bone substitute exhibited dimensional shrinkage for up to 1.5 years postsurgery. However, the peri-implant marginal bone loss did not exceed 1 mm throughout the observational periods in all groups. Conclusions: The clinical findings of this study suggest that the alveolar ridge can be vertically augmented using either allogenous bone block or particulated bone substitute. However, they require a longer healing period to ensure dimensional stability compared to the autogenous bone block.",
author = "Park, {Yun Ho} and Seongho Choi and Cho, {Kyoo Sung} and Lee, {Jung Seok}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cid.12502",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "742--749",
journal = "Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dimensional alterations following vertical ridge augmentation using collagen membrane and three types of bone grafting materials

T2 - A retrospective observational study

AU - Park, Yun Ho

AU - Choi, Seongho

AU - Cho, Kyoo Sung

AU - Lee, Jung Seok

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Background: Various biomaterials have been introduced for vertical ridge augmentation to replace autogenous block bone grafting. Purpose: This retrospective study radiographically evaluated dimensional alterations of the vertically augmented alveolar ridge using collagen membrane and 3 types of materials: autogenous bone block, allogenous bone block, and particulated bone substitute. Materials and methods: The electronic medical records of 32 patients who received vertical ridge augmentation using 3 types of materials were searched: 9 for autogenous bone block, 12 for allogenous bone block, and 11 for particulated bone substitutes. The vertical bone gain, progression of bone resorption, and peri-implant marginal bone loss after prosthetic loading were measured on follow-up radiographs. Results: The alveolar ridge was vertically augmented by 5.13 ± 1.61, 4.54 ± 2.48, and 3.90 ± 0.85 mm (mean ± standard deviation) after grafting with autogenous bone block, allogenous bone block, and particulated bone substitute, respectively. The radiographic vertical height of the augmented ridge that received autogenous bone block reduced continuously during the first year but was stable thereafter. Sites that received allogenous bone block or particulated bone substitute exhibited dimensional shrinkage for up to 1.5 years postsurgery. However, the peri-implant marginal bone loss did not exceed 1 mm throughout the observational periods in all groups. Conclusions: The clinical findings of this study suggest that the alveolar ridge can be vertically augmented using either allogenous bone block or particulated bone substitute. However, they require a longer healing period to ensure dimensional stability compared to the autogenous bone block.

AB - Background: Various biomaterials have been introduced for vertical ridge augmentation to replace autogenous block bone grafting. Purpose: This retrospective study radiographically evaluated dimensional alterations of the vertically augmented alveolar ridge using collagen membrane and 3 types of materials: autogenous bone block, allogenous bone block, and particulated bone substitute. Materials and methods: The electronic medical records of 32 patients who received vertical ridge augmentation using 3 types of materials were searched: 9 for autogenous bone block, 12 for allogenous bone block, and 11 for particulated bone substitutes. The vertical bone gain, progression of bone resorption, and peri-implant marginal bone loss after prosthetic loading were measured on follow-up radiographs. Results: The alveolar ridge was vertically augmented by 5.13 ± 1.61, 4.54 ± 2.48, and 3.90 ± 0.85 mm (mean ± standard deviation) after grafting with autogenous bone block, allogenous bone block, and particulated bone substitute, respectively. The radiographic vertical height of the augmented ridge that received autogenous bone block reduced continuously during the first year but was stable thereafter. Sites that received allogenous bone block or particulated bone substitute exhibited dimensional shrinkage for up to 1.5 years postsurgery. However, the peri-implant marginal bone loss did not exceed 1 mm throughout the observational periods in all groups. Conclusions: The clinical findings of this study suggest that the alveolar ridge can be vertically augmented using either allogenous bone block or particulated bone substitute. However, they require a longer healing period to ensure dimensional stability compared to the autogenous bone block.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019685129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019685129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cid.12502

DO - 10.1111/cid.12502

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 742

EP - 749

JO - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

JF - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

SN - 1523-0899

IS - 4

ER -