Do family order and neighbor intervention against intimate partner violence protect children from abuse? Findings from Kathmandu

Clifton R. Emery, Sirjana Thapa, Mi Hyang Do, Ko Ling Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on previous research on intimate partner violence, child maltreatment, and informal social control, we hypothesized relationships between child abuse severity and (1) protective informal social control of intimate partner violence (ISC_IPV) by neighbors, (2) intimate terrorism, (3) family order, and (4) the power of mothers in intimate relationships. In what we believe may be a first study of physical child abuse by parents in Nepal, we used a three stage cluster approach to draw a random sample of 300 families in Kathmandu. Random effects regression models were used to test the study hypotheses. The analyses found support for hypotheses one and two, but with an important caveat. Although observed (actual) protective ISC_IPV had the hypothesized negative association with child abuse severity, in one of our models perceived protective ISC_IPV was positively associated with child abuse severity. The models clarify that the overall direction of protective ISC_IPV appears to be negative (protective), but the positive finding is important to consider for both research and practice. A significant relationship between family order and child abuse severity was found, but the direction was negative rather than positive as in hypothesis three. Implications for neighborhood research and typological research on IPV and child maltreatment are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-181
Number of pages12
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Child Abuse
Informal Social Control
Research
Terrorism
Nepal
Intimate Partner Violence
Parents
Mothers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Emery, Clifton R. ; Thapa, Sirjana ; Do, Mi Hyang ; Chan, Ko Ling. / Do family order and neighbor intervention against intimate partner violence protect children from abuse? Findings from Kathmandu. In: Child Abuse and Neglect. 2015 ; Vol. 41. pp. 170-181.
@article{c0b19fad0d0a4453b8bc22fcbcfcf0a2,
title = "Do family order and neighbor intervention against intimate partner violence protect children from abuse? Findings from Kathmandu",
abstract = "Drawing on previous research on intimate partner violence, child maltreatment, and informal social control, we hypothesized relationships between child abuse severity and (1) protective informal social control of intimate partner violence (ISC_IPV) by neighbors, (2) intimate terrorism, (3) family order, and (4) the power of mothers in intimate relationships. In what we believe may be a first study of physical child abuse by parents in Nepal, we used a three stage cluster approach to draw a random sample of 300 families in Kathmandu. Random effects regression models were used to test the study hypotheses. The analyses found support for hypotheses one and two, but with an important caveat. Although observed (actual) protective ISC_IPV had the hypothesized negative association with child abuse severity, in one of our models perceived protective ISC_IPV was positively associated with child abuse severity. The models clarify that the overall direction of protective ISC_IPV appears to be negative (protective), but the positive finding is important to consider for both research and practice. A significant relationship between family order and child abuse severity was found, but the direction was negative rather than positive as in hypothesis three. Implications for neighborhood research and typological research on IPV and child maltreatment are discussed.",
author = "Emery, {Clifton R.} and Sirjana Thapa and Do, {Mi Hyang} and Chan, {Ko Ling}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "170--181",
journal = "Child Abuse and Neglect",
issn = "0145-2134",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Do family order and neighbor intervention against intimate partner violence protect children from abuse? Findings from Kathmandu. / Emery, Clifton R.; Thapa, Sirjana; Do, Mi Hyang; Chan, Ko Ling.

In: Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 41, 01.03.2015, p. 170-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do family order and neighbor intervention against intimate partner violence protect children from abuse? Findings from Kathmandu

AU - Emery, Clifton R.

AU - Thapa, Sirjana

AU - Do, Mi Hyang

AU - Chan, Ko Ling

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Drawing on previous research on intimate partner violence, child maltreatment, and informal social control, we hypothesized relationships between child abuse severity and (1) protective informal social control of intimate partner violence (ISC_IPV) by neighbors, (2) intimate terrorism, (3) family order, and (4) the power of mothers in intimate relationships. In what we believe may be a first study of physical child abuse by parents in Nepal, we used a three stage cluster approach to draw a random sample of 300 families in Kathmandu. Random effects regression models were used to test the study hypotheses. The analyses found support for hypotheses one and two, but with an important caveat. Although observed (actual) protective ISC_IPV had the hypothesized negative association with child abuse severity, in one of our models perceived protective ISC_IPV was positively associated with child abuse severity. The models clarify that the overall direction of protective ISC_IPV appears to be negative (protective), but the positive finding is important to consider for both research and practice. A significant relationship between family order and child abuse severity was found, but the direction was negative rather than positive as in hypothesis three. Implications for neighborhood research and typological research on IPV and child maltreatment are discussed.

AB - Drawing on previous research on intimate partner violence, child maltreatment, and informal social control, we hypothesized relationships between child abuse severity and (1) protective informal social control of intimate partner violence (ISC_IPV) by neighbors, (2) intimate terrorism, (3) family order, and (4) the power of mothers in intimate relationships. In what we believe may be a first study of physical child abuse by parents in Nepal, we used a three stage cluster approach to draw a random sample of 300 families in Kathmandu. Random effects regression models were used to test the study hypotheses. The analyses found support for hypotheses one and two, but with an important caveat. Although observed (actual) protective ISC_IPV had the hypothesized negative association with child abuse severity, in one of our models perceived protective ISC_IPV was positively associated with child abuse severity. The models clarify that the overall direction of protective ISC_IPV appears to be negative (protective), but the positive finding is important to consider for both research and practice. A significant relationship between family order and child abuse severity was found, but the direction was negative rather than positive as in hypothesis three. Implications for neighborhood research and typological research on IPV and child maltreatment are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925233508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925233508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.10.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 25455214

AN - SCOPUS:84925233508

VL - 41

SP - 170

EP - 181

JO - Child Abuse and Neglect

JF - Child Abuse and Neglect

SN - 0145-2134

ER -