Do the Contents of Working Memory Capture Attention? Yes, But Cognitive Control Matters

Suk Won Han, Min-Shik Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been a controversy on whether working memory can guide attentional selection. Some researchers have reported that the contents of working memory guide attention automatically in visual search (D. Soto, D. Heinke, G. W. Humphreys, & M. J. Blanco, 2005). On the other hand, G.F. Woodman and S. J. Luck (2007) reported that they could not find any evidence of attentional capture by working memory. In the present study, we tried to find an integrative explanation for the different sets of results. We report evidence for attentional capture by working memory, but this effect was eliminated when search was perceptually demanding or the onset of the search was delayed long enough for cognitive control of search to be implemented under particular conditions. We suggest that perceptual difficulty and the time course of cognitive control as important factors that determine when information in working memory influences attention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1292-1302
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Research Personnel
Cognitive Control
Attention Capture
Working Memory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{c792bd5e5c1e4c20b74ebe351aef89b8,
title = "Do the Contents of Working Memory Capture Attention? Yes, But Cognitive Control Matters",
abstract = "There has been a controversy on whether working memory can guide attentional selection. Some researchers have reported that the contents of working memory guide attention automatically in visual search (D. Soto, D. Heinke, G. W. Humphreys, & M. J. Blanco, 2005). On the other hand, G.F. Woodman and S. J. Luck (2007) reported that they could not find any evidence of attentional capture by working memory. In the present study, we tried to find an integrative explanation for the different sets of results. We report evidence for attentional capture by working memory, but this effect was eliminated when search was perceptually demanding or the onset of the search was delayed long enough for cognitive control of search to be implemented under particular conditions. We suggest that perceptual difficulty and the time course of cognitive control as important factors that determine when information in working memory influences attention.",
author = "Han, {Suk Won} and Min-Shik Kim",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0016452",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1292--1302",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Do the Contents of Working Memory Capture Attention? Yes, But Cognitive Control Matters. / Han, Suk Won; Kim, Min-Shik.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 35, No. 5, 01.10.2009, p. 1292-1302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do the Contents of Working Memory Capture Attention? Yes, But Cognitive Control Matters

AU - Han, Suk Won

AU - Kim, Min-Shik

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - There has been a controversy on whether working memory can guide attentional selection. Some researchers have reported that the contents of working memory guide attention automatically in visual search (D. Soto, D. Heinke, G. W. Humphreys, & M. J. Blanco, 2005). On the other hand, G.F. Woodman and S. J. Luck (2007) reported that they could not find any evidence of attentional capture by working memory. In the present study, we tried to find an integrative explanation for the different sets of results. We report evidence for attentional capture by working memory, but this effect was eliminated when search was perceptually demanding or the onset of the search was delayed long enough for cognitive control of search to be implemented under particular conditions. We suggest that perceptual difficulty and the time course of cognitive control as important factors that determine when information in working memory influences attention.

AB - There has been a controversy on whether working memory can guide attentional selection. Some researchers have reported that the contents of working memory guide attention automatically in visual search (D. Soto, D. Heinke, G. W. Humphreys, & M. J. Blanco, 2005). On the other hand, G.F. Woodman and S. J. Luck (2007) reported that they could not find any evidence of attentional capture by working memory. In the present study, we tried to find an integrative explanation for the different sets of results. We report evidence for attentional capture by working memory, but this effect was eliminated when search was perceptually demanding or the onset of the search was delayed long enough for cognitive control of search to be implemented under particular conditions. We suggest that perceptual difficulty and the time course of cognitive control as important factors that determine when information in working memory influences attention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350504138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350504138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0016452

DO - 10.1037/a0016452

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1292

EP - 1302

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 5

ER -