Does Conventional Lateral Long Bone Radiography Present Sagittal Axes Accurately? A Comparison with Direct Lateral Long Bone Radiography

Hyuck Min Kwon, Hee June Kim, Young Han Lee, Eshnazarov Eshnazarovich, Gil Han Lee, jinwoo lee, Ick Hwan Yang, Kwan Kyu Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To investigate the sagittal alignment, proper and consistent radiographic evaluation is needed. We sought to use an alternative method of obtaining the same view, a direct lateral view and compare it with the conventional method. Conventional lateral long bone radiography and direct lateral long bone radiography were undertaken by 74 consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), preoperatively and postoperatively. Angles between sagittal axes and the mechanical axis (MA), and the visible hip joint area were measured. Postoperative angles between the MA and femoral implant were also significantly different between the two radiologic methods of conventional and direct lateral long bone radiography (92.1 ± 2.1 degrees vs. 94.4 ± 2.6 degrees, p = 0.034). Hip joint visibility was significantly inferior using the direct lateral method (p < 0.001). The angles on the sagittal axes on conventional radiography of the lower extremities were different from those on direct lateral long bone radiography. The direct lateral long bone radiographs show the true lateral view, and surgeons may consider using the direct lateral method when evaluating relevant alignments before and after TKAs. For obese patients, however, conventional or combined methods should be considered because of inferior visibility of the hip joint using the direct method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-257
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Knee Surgery
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Radiography
Bone and Bones
Hip Joint
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Thigh
Lower Extremity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Kwon, Hyuck Min ; Kim, Hee June ; Lee, Young Han ; Eshnazarovich, Eshnazarov ; Lee, Gil Han ; lee, jinwoo ; Yang, Ick Hwan ; Park, Kwan Kyu. / Does Conventional Lateral Long Bone Radiography Present Sagittal Axes Accurately? A Comparison with Direct Lateral Long Bone Radiography. In: Journal of Knee Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 252-257.
@article{3d9a7c2129024a0fb3b78d3f8068afd2,
title = "Does Conventional Lateral Long Bone Radiography Present Sagittal Axes Accurately? A Comparison with Direct Lateral Long Bone Radiography",
abstract = "To investigate the sagittal alignment, proper and consistent radiographic evaluation is needed. We sought to use an alternative method of obtaining the same view, a direct lateral view and compare it with the conventional method. Conventional lateral long bone radiography and direct lateral long bone radiography were undertaken by 74 consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), preoperatively and postoperatively. Angles between sagittal axes and the mechanical axis (MA), and the visible hip joint area were measured. Postoperative angles between the MA and femoral implant were also significantly different between the two radiologic methods of conventional and direct lateral long bone radiography (92.1 ± 2.1 degrees vs. 94.4 ± 2.6 degrees, p = 0.034). Hip joint visibility was significantly inferior using the direct lateral method (p < 0.001). The angles on the sagittal axes on conventional radiography of the lower extremities were different from those on direct lateral long bone radiography. The direct lateral long bone radiographs show the true lateral view, and surgeons may consider using the direct lateral method when evaluating relevant alignments before and after TKAs. For obese patients, however, conventional or combined methods should be considered because of inferior visibility of the hip joint using the direct method.",
author = "Kwon, {Hyuck Min} and Kim, {Hee June} and Lee, {Young Han} and Eshnazarov Eshnazarovich and Lee, {Gil Han} and jinwoo lee and Yang, {Ick Hwan} and Park, {Kwan Kyu}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0036-1584537",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "252--257",
journal = "Journal of Knee Surgery",
issn = "1538-8506",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "3",

}

Does Conventional Lateral Long Bone Radiography Present Sagittal Axes Accurately? A Comparison with Direct Lateral Long Bone Radiography. / Kwon, Hyuck Min; Kim, Hee June; Lee, Young Han; Eshnazarovich, Eshnazarov; Lee, Gil Han; lee, jinwoo; Yang, Ick Hwan; Park, Kwan Kyu.

In: Journal of Knee Surgery, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 252-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Conventional Lateral Long Bone Radiography Present Sagittal Axes Accurately? A Comparison with Direct Lateral Long Bone Radiography

AU - Kwon, Hyuck Min

AU - Kim, Hee June

AU - Lee, Young Han

AU - Eshnazarovich, Eshnazarov

AU - Lee, Gil Han

AU - lee, jinwoo

AU - Yang, Ick Hwan

AU - Park, Kwan Kyu

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - To investigate the sagittal alignment, proper and consistent radiographic evaluation is needed. We sought to use an alternative method of obtaining the same view, a direct lateral view and compare it with the conventional method. Conventional lateral long bone radiography and direct lateral long bone radiography were undertaken by 74 consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), preoperatively and postoperatively. Angles between sagittal axes and the mechanical axis (MA), and the visible hip joint area were measured. Postoperative angles between the MA and femoral implant were also significantly different between the two radiologic methods of conventional and direct lateral long bone radiography (92.1 ± 2.1 degrees vs. 94.4 ± 2.6 degrees, p = 0.034). Hip joint visibility was significantly inferior using the direct lateral method (p < 0.001). The angles on the sagittal axes on conventional radiography of the lower extremities were different from those on direct lateral long bone radiography. The direct lateral long bone radiographs show the true lateral view, and surgeons may consider using the direct lateral method when evaluating relevant alignments before and after TKAs. For obese patients, however, conventional or combined methods should be considered because of inferior visibility of the hip joint using the direct method.

AB - To investigate the sagittal alignment, proper and consistent radiographic evaluation is needed. We sought to use an alternative method of obtaining the same view, a direct lateral view and compare it with the conventional method. Conventional lateral long bone radiography and direct lateral long bone radiography were undertaken by 74 consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), preoperatively and postoperatively. Angles between sagittal axes and the mechanical axis (MA), and the visible hip joint area were measured. Postoperative angles between the MA and femoral implant were also significantly different between the two radiologic methods of conventional and direct lateral long bone radiography (92.1 ± 2.1 degrees vs. 94.4 ± 2.6 degrees, p = 0.034). Hip joint visibility was significantly inferior using the direct lateral method (p < 0.001). The angles on the sagittal axes on conventional radiography of the lower extremities were different from those on direct lateral long bone radiography. The direct lateral long bone radiographs show the true lateral view, and surgeons may consider using the direct lateral method when evaluating relevant alignments before and after TKAs. For obese patients, however, conventional or combined methods should be considered because of inferior visibility of the hip joint using the direct method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976871833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976871833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0036-1584537

DO - 10.1055/s-0036-1584537

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 252

EP - 257

JO - Journal of Knee Surgery

JF - Journal of Knee Surgery

SN - 1538-8506

IS - 3

ER -