Does family still matter? Public and private transfers in emerging welfare state systems in a comparative perspective

Jin Wook Kim, Young Jun Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While the role of the family has been a distinctive feature of East Asian welfare systems, rapid social policy development and reforms in South Korea and Taiwan over the last two decades have led to an increase in public welfare. Yet, despite a growing number of studies, little is known about the role of family support - private transfers - and public programmes in the performance of state welfare. This article reports on a comparative analysis of the role of public and private transfers aimed at poverty and inequality reduction in 12 Western and two East Asian states employing the Luxemburg Income Study data set. Results indicate that, in contrast to the West, private transfers that rest primarily on family support remain more important than public transfers in reducing income inequality and poverty in South Korea and Taiwan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-366
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Social Welfare
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Oct 1

Fingerprint

welfare state
South Korea
Taiwan
welfare
poverty
income
reform
performance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{00fccf1b160240a0b5c77dfcd52d1fbc,
title = "Does family still matter? Public and private transfers in emerging welfare state systems in a comparative perspective",
abstract = "While the role of the family has been a distinctive feature of East Asian welfare systems, rapid social policy development and reforms in South Korea and Taiwan over the last two decades have led to an increase in public welfare. Yet, despite a growing number of studies, little is known about the role of family support - private transfers - and public programmes in the performance of state welfare. This article reports on a comparative analysis of the role of public and private transfers aimed at poverty and inequality reduction in 12 Western and two East Asian states employing the Luxemburg Income Study data set. Results indicate that, in contrast to the West, private transfers that rest primarily on family support remain more important than public transfers in reducing income inequality and poverty in South Korea and Taiwan.",
author = "Kim, {Jin Wook} and Choi, {Young Jun}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00752.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "353--366",
journal = "International Journal of Social Welfare",
issn = "1369-6866",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does family still matter? Public and private transfers in emerging welfare state systems in a comparative perspective

AU - Kim, Jin Wook

AU - Choi, Young Jun

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - While the role of the family has been a distinctive feature of East Asian welfare systems, rapid social policy development and reforms in South Korea and Taiwan over the last two decades have led to an increase in public welfare. Yet, despite a growing number of studies, little is known about the role of family support - private transfers - and public programmes in the performance of state welfare. This article reports on a comparative analysis of the role of public and private transfers aimed at poverty and inequality reduction in 12 Western and two East Asian states employing the Luxemburg Income Study data set. Results indicate that, in contrast to the West, private transfers that rest primarily on family support remain more important than public transfers in reducing income inequality and poverty in South Korea and Taiwan.

AB - While the role of the family has been a distinctive feature of East Asian welfare systems, rapid social policy development and reforms in South Korea and Taiwan over the last two decades have led to an increase in public welfare. Yet, despite a growing number of studies, little is known about the role of family support - private transfers - and public programmes in the performance of state welfare. This article reports on a comparative analysis of the role of public and private transfers aimed at poverty and inequality reduction in 12 Western and two East Asian states employing the Luxemburg Income Study data set. Results indicate that, in contrast to the West, private transfers that rest primarily on family support remain more important than public transfers in reducing income inequality and poverty in South Korea and Taiwan.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052494191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052494191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00752.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00752.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80052494191

VL - 20

SP - 353

EP - 366

JO - International Journal of Social Welfare

JF - International Journal of Social Welfare

SN - 1369-6866

IS - 4

ER -