Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? the intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness

Subin Im, Charlotte H. Mason, Mark B. Houston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Empirical studies provide an inconsistent picture of the relationship between an innovative personality predisposition (i.e., innate consumer innovativeness [ICI]) and innovative behavior (i.e., new product adoption behavior). Such inconsistencies suggest intervening variables that may mediate the relationship have not been considered. Using data from a panel of consumers (n∈=∈296 in a cross-sectional phase, n∈=∈147 in a matched, two-phase longitudinal analysis), we find that ICI does not directly influence adoption behavior but does so indirectly through two of three components of vicarious innovativeness (modeling and engagement in word of mouth but not exposure to advertising). Furthermore, despite the evidence that consumers' decision processes differ for service versus product adoption, extant studies largely ignore the role of ICI in new service adoption. Our findings suggest that vicarious innovativeness plays a similar intervening role in service contexts. Finally, divergent operationalizations of adoption behavior (ownership, relative time of adoption) appear to perform equally well.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-75
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Social learning
Innovativeness
Consumer innovativeness
New products
Modeling
New product adoption
Ownership
New services
Innovative behavior
Operationalization
Longitudinal analysis
Decision process
Word-of-mouth
Inconsistency
Consumer decision
Empirical study

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{77ee2bbdbd1e4d9db489d1fa72bf01ec,
title = "Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? the intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness",
abstract = "Empirical studies provide an inconsistent picture of the relationship between an innovative personality predisposition (i.e., innate consumer innovativeness [ICI]) and innovative behavior (i.e., new product adoption behavior). Such inconsistencies suggest intervening variables that may mediate the relationship have not been considered. Using data from a panel of consumers (n∈=∈296 in a cross-sectional phase, n∈=∈147 in a matched, two-phase longitudinal analysis), we find that ICI does not directly influence adoption behavior but does so indirectly through two of three components of vicarious innovativeness (modeling and engagement in word of mouth but not exposure to advertising). Furthermore, despite the evidence that consumers' decision processes differ for service versus product adoption, extant studies largely ignore the role of ICI in new service adoption. Our findings suggest that vicarious innovativeness plays a similar intervening role in service contexts. Finally, divergent operationalizations of adoption behavior (ownership, relative time of adoption) appear to perform equally well.",
author = "Subin Im and Mason, {Charlotte H.} and Houston, {Mark B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11747-006-0007-z",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "63--75",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science",
issn = "0092-0703",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? the intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness. / Im, Subin; Mason, Charlotte H.; Houston, Mark B.

In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.03.2007, p. 63-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? the intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness

AU - Im, Subin

AU - Mason, Charlotte H.

AU - Houston, Mark B.

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - Empirical studies provide an inconsistent picture of the relationship between an innovative personality predisposition (i.e., innate consumer innovativeness [ICI]) and innovative behavior (i.e., new product adoption behavior). Such inconsistencies suggest intervening variables that may mediate the relationship have not been considered. Using data from a panel of consumers (n∈=∈296 in a cross-sectional phase, n∈=∈147 in a matched, two-phase longitudinal analysis), we find that ICI does not directly influence adoption behavior but does so indirectly through two of three components of vicarious innovativeness (modeling and engagement in word of mouth but not exposure to advertising). Furthermore, despite the evidence that consumers' decision processes differ for service versus product adoption, extant studies largely ignore the role of ICI in new service adoption. Our findings suggest that vicarious innovativeness plays a similar intervening role in service contexts. Finally, divergent operationalizations of adoption behavior (ownership, relative time of adoption) appear to perform equally well.

AB - Empirical studies provide an inconsistent picture of the relationship between an innovative personality predisposition (i.e., innate consumer innovativeness [ICI]) and innovative behavior (i.e., new product adoption behavior). Such inconsistencies suggest intervening variables that may mediate the relationship have not been considered. Using data from a panel of consumers (n∈=∈296 in a cross-sectional phase, n∈=∈147 in a matched, two-phase longitudinal analysis), we find that ICI does not directly influence adoption behavior but does so indirectly through two of three components of vicarious innovativeness (modeling and engagement in word of mouth but not exposure to advertising). Furthermore, despite the evidence that consumers' decision processes differ for service versus product adoption, extant studies largely ignore the role of ICI in new service adoption. Our findings suggest that vicarious innovativeness plays a similar intervening role in service contexts. Finally, divergent operationalizations of adoption behavior (ownership, relative time of adoption) appear to perform equally well.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56249138241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56249138241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11747-006-0007-z

DO - 10.1007/s11747-006-0007-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:56249138241

VL - 35

SP - 63

EP - 75

JO - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

JF - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

SN - 0092-0703

IS - 1

ER -