Does power boost happiness? The relative importance of personal versus social power in two cultures

Jiyoung Park, Eun Kook Suh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers have revealed that power has both independent and interdependent aspects, and how the two dimensions are activated depends on contextual goals and values. In the present study, we tested the differential effects of power on happiness in two cultures that differ in their relative emphasis of social relations. We hypothesized that in an interdependent culture (South Korea), power based on interpersonal connectedness (i.e., social power) would enhance happiness more than would power that stems from independence from others (i.e., personal power). In contrast, in an independent culture (America), we examined whether personal power would bring more happiness than would social power. Findings showed that social power increased life satisfaction but personal power decreased affective well-being among Korean participants. In contrast, American participants' personal power enhanced their subjective well-being, but their well-being did not differ by levels of social power. Implications of these findings for types of power, happiness, and culture are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)212-218
Number of pages7
JournalAsian Journal of Social Psychology
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Happiness
happiness
well-being
Power (Psychology)
Republic of Korea
South Korea
Social Relations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{bf661867234342cebaebfa7409c96d41,
title = "Does power boost happiness? The relative importance of personal versus social power in two cultures",
abstract = "Researchers have revealed that power has both independent and interdependent aspects, and how the two dimensions are activated depends on contextual goals and values. In the present study, we tested the differential effects of power on happiness in two cultures that differ in their relative emphasis of social relations. We hypothesized that in an interdependent culture (South Korea), power based on interpersonal connectedness (i.e., social power) would enhance happiness more than would power that stems from independence from others (i.e., personal power). In contrast, in an independent culture (America), we examined whether personal power would bring more happiness than would social power. Findings showed that social power increased life satisfaction but personal power decreased affective well-being among Korean participants. In contrast, American participants' personal power enhanced their subjective well-being, but their well-being did not differ by levels of social power. Implications of these findings for types of power, happiness, and culture are discussed.",
author = "Jiyoung Park and Suh, {Eun Kook}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ajsp.12320",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "212--218",
journal = "Asian Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "1367-2223",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Does power boost happiness? The relative importance of personal versus social power in two cultures. / Park, Jiyoung; Suh, Eun Kook.

In: Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 212-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does power boost happiness? The relative importance of personal versus social power in two cultures

AU - Park, Jiyoung

AU - Suh, Eun Kook

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Researchers have revealed that power has both independent and interdependent aspects, and how the two dimensions are activated depends on contextual goals and values. In the present study, we tested the differential effects of power on happiness in two cultures that differ in their relative emphasis of social relations. We hypothesized that in an interdependent culture (South Korea), power based on interpersonal connectedness (i.e., social power) would enhance happiness more than would power that stems from independence from others (i.e., personal power). In contrast, in an independent culture (America), we examined whether personal power would bring more happiness than would social power. Findings showed that social power increased life satisfaction but personal power decreased affective well-being among Korean participants. In contrast, American participants' personal power enhanced their subjective well-being, but their well-being did not differ by levels of social power. Implications of these findings for types of power, happiness, and culture are discussed.

AB - Researchers have revealed that power has both independent and interdependent aspects, and how the two dimensions are activated depends on contextual goals and values. In the present study, we tested the differential effects of power on happiness in two cultures that differ in their relative emphasis of social relations. We hypothesized that in an interdependent culture (South Korea), power based on interpersonal connectedness (i.e., social power) would enhance happiness more than would power that stems from independence from others (i.e., personal power). In contrast, in an independent culture (America), we examined whether personal power would bring more happiness than would social power. Findings showed that social power increased life satisfaction but personal power decreased affective well-being among Korean participants. In contrast, American participants' personal power enhanced their subjective well-being, but their well-being did not differ by levels of social power. Implications of these findings for types of power, happiness, and culture are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047528861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047528861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajsp.12320

DO - 10.1111/ajsp.12320

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 212

EP - 218

JO - Asian Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Asian Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 1367-2223

IS - 3

ER -