Economic Sanctions and Government Spending Adjustments: The Case of Disaster Preparedness

Elena V. McLean, Taehee Whang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Economic sanctions research suggests that sanctioned countries' overall economic costs tend to be low. This article argues that, despite this, sanction costs can force the governments of these countries to reallocate budget resources from low-priority spending categories to other categories in an effort to minimize their political costs. One such low-priority category is disaster preparedness and mitigation. The authors show that economic sanctions lead to reduced disaster preparedness spending and, as a result, increase the scale of economic and human losses generated by natural disasters in sanctioned countries.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

economic sanction
disaster
costs
sanction
economics
natural disaster
budget
resources

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{dc06f23982ca499ea5a9e9274cf56cb3,
title = "Economic Sanctions and Government Spending Adjustments: The Case of Disaster Preparedness",
abstract = "Economic sanctions research suggests that sanctioned countries' overall economic costs tend to be low. This article argues that, despite this, sanction costs can force the governments of these countries to reallocate budget resources from low-priority spending categories to other categories in an effort to minimize their political costs. One such low-priority category is disaster preparedness and mitigation. The authors show that economic sanctions lead to reduced disaster preparedness spending and, as a result, increase the scale of economic and human losses generated by natural disasters in sanctioned countries.",
author = "McLean, {Elena V.} and Taehee Whang",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0007123418000613",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0007-1234",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic Sanctions and Government Spending Adjustments

T2 - The Case of Disaster Preparedness

AU - McLean, Elena V.

AU - Whang, Taehee

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Economic sanctions research suggests that sanctioned countries' overall economic costs tend to be low. This article argues that, despite this, sanction costs can force the governments of these countries to reallocate budget resources from low-priority spending categories to other categories in an effort to minimize their political costs. One such low-priority category is disaster preparedness and mitigation. The authors show that economic sanctions lead to reduced disaster preparedness spending and, as a result, increase the scale of economic and human losses generated by natural disasters in sanctioned countries.

AB - Economic sanctions research suggests that sanctioned countries' overall economic costs tend to be low. This article argues that, despite this, sanction costs can force the governments of these countries to reallocate budget resources from low-priority spending categories to other categories in an effort to minimize their political costs. One such low-priority category is disaster preparedness and mitigation. The authors show that economic sanctions lead to reduced disaster preparedness spending and, as a result, increase the scale of economic and human losses generated by natural disasters in sanctioned countries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069895577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069895577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007123418000613

DO - 10.1017/S0007123418000613

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069895577

JO - British Journal of Political Science

JF - British Journal of Political Science

SN - 0007-1234

ER -