Abstract
Purpose To investigate and compare vaulting and movement changes during accommodation in eyes with the V4c and V4 implantable collamer lenses (ICL). Design Comparative, observational case series. Methods The medical records of 35 eyes (18 patients) with the V4 ICL and 51 eyes (26 patients) with the V4c ICL were retrospectively examined and included in analyses. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), posterior corneal surface-to-ICL distance (endo-ICL distance), pupil size, and postoperative vaulting were evaluated using the Visante anterior chamber optical coherence tomography system. Images were taken during the nonaccommodative and accommodative states 3 months after ICL implantation. Refractive error, keratometry values, axial length, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. Results ICL vaulting did not significantly change during accommodation in eyes with either the V4 or V4c ICL (P =.532 for V4 ICL and P =.415 for V4c ICL). However, significant reductions in ACD, endo-ICL distance, and pupil size were observed during accommodation in both groups. In eyes with a V4 ICL, the change in [Δ] ACD was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (P <.001), Δendo-ICL distance was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (P <.001), and Δpupil size was 0.5 ± 0.9 mm (P =.021). For eyes with the V4c ICL, ΔACD was 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (P <.001), Δendo-ICL distance was 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (P <.001), and Δpupil size was 0.8 ± 1.2 mm (P <.001). The mean reductions of each parameter were not statistically different between eyes with the V4 ICL and the V4c ICL. Conclusions Contrary to the light stimulation response, accommodation does not significantly affect ICL vaulting differently in eyes with either the V4 or V4C ICLs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 710-716.e1 |
| Journal | American Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Volume | 160 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 Oct 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Ophthalmology
Cite this
}
Effect of Accommodation on Vaulting and Movement of Posterior Chamber Phakic Lenses in Eyes with Implantable Collamer Lenses. / Lee, Hun; Kang, David Sung Yong; Ha, Byoung Jin; Choi, Moonjung; Kim, Eungkweon; Seo, KyoungYul; Kim, Tae-im.
In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 160, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 710-716.e1.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Accommodation on Vaulting and Movement of Posterior Chamber Phakic Lenses in Eyes with Implantable Collamer Lenses
AU - Lee, Hun
AU - Kang, David Sung Yong
AU - Ha, Byoung Jin
AU - Choi, Moonjung
AU - Kim, Eungkweon
AU - Seo, KyoungYul
AU - Kim, Tae-im
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Purpose To investigate and compare vaulting and movement changes during accommodation in eyes with the V4c and V4 implantable collamer lenses (ICL). Design Comparative, observational case series. Methods The medical records of 35 eyes (18 patients) with the V4 ICL and 51 eyes (26 patients) with the V4c ICL were retrospectively examined and included in analyses. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), posterior corneal surface-to-ICL distance (endo-ICL distance), pupil size, and postoperative vaulting were evaluated using the Visante anterior chamber optical coherence tomography system. Images were taken during the nonaccommodative and accommodative states 3 months after ICL implantation. Refractive error, keratometry values, axial length, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. Results ICL vaulting did not significantly change during accommodation in eyes with either the V4 or V4c ICL (P =.532 for V4 ICL and P =.415 for V4c ICL). However, significant reductions in ACD, endo-ICL distance, and pupil size were observed during accommodation in both groups. In eyes with a V4 ICL, the change in [Δ] ACD was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (P <.001), Δendo-ICL distance was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (P <.001), and Δpupil size was 0.5 ± 0.9 mm (P =.021). For eyes with the V4c ICL, ΔACD was 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (P <.001), Δendo-ICL distance was 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (P <.001), and Δpupil size was 0.8 ± 1.2 mm (P <.001). The mean reductions of each parameter were not statistically different between eyes with the V4 ICL and the V4c ICL. Conclusions Contrary to the light stimulation response, accommodation does not significantly affect ICL vaulting differently in eyes with either the V4 or V4C ICLs.
AB - Purpose To investigate and compare vaulting and movement changes during accommodation in eyes with the V4c and V4 implantable collamer lenses (ICL). Design Comparative, observational case series. Methods The medical records of 35 eyes (18 patients) with the V4 ICL and 51 eyes (26 patients) with the V4c ICL were retrospectively examined and included in analyses. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), posterior corneal surface-to-ICL distance (endo-ICL distance), pupil size, and postoperative vaulting were evaluated using the Visante anterior chamber optical coherence tomography system. Images were taken during the nonaccommodative and accommodative states 3 months after ICL implantation. Refractive error, keratometry values, axial length, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. Results ICL vaulting did not significantly change during accommodation in eyes with either the V4 or V4c ICL (P =.532 for V4 ICL and P =.415 for V4c ICL). However, significant reductions in ACD, endo-ICL distance, and pupil size were observed during accommodation in both groups. In eyes with a V4 ICL, the change in [Δ] ACD was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (P <.001), Δendo-ICL distance was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (P <.001), and Δpupil size was 0.5 ± 0.9 mm (P =.021). For eyes with the V4c ICL, ΔACD was 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (P <.001), Δendo-ICL distance was 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (P <.001), and Δpupil size was 0.8 ± 1.2 mm (P <.001). The mean reductions of each parameter were not statistically different between eyes with the V4 ICL and the V4c ICL. Conclusions Contrary to the light stimulation response, accommodation does not significantly affect ICL vaulting differently in eyes with either the V4 or V4C ICLs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941418634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941418634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 26189089
AN - SCOPUS:84941418634
VL - 160
SP - 710-716.e1
JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology
SN - 0002-9394
IS - 4
ER -