Effect of co-implantation of a capsular tension ring on clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with monofocal intraocular lens implantation

Hyun Ju Park, Hun Lee, Do Wook Kim, Eung Kweon Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo, Tae Im Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The objective was to evaluate the effect of co-implantation of a preloaded capsular tension ring (CTR) and aberrationfree monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) on clinical outcomes and visual quality after cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent cataract surgery were randomized into two groups that were implanted with a CTR and IOL (group 1, 26 eyes) or an IOL only (group 2, 26 eyes). At 1 and 3 months after surgery, visual acuity, refractive errors, refractive prediction errors, ocular aberrations, and modulation transfer function (MTF) were analyzed. At 3 months postoperatively, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and contrast sensitivity were evaluated. Results: Group 1 showed greater hyperopic shift, which caused the refractive prediction error at 3 months after surgery to be significantly different between the two groups (p=0.049). Differences in ACD between the preoperative and postoperative periods tended to be greater in group 1 than in group 2. At 3 months postoperatively, internal MTF values at 20, 25, and 30 cycles per degree were significantly better in group 1 than in group 2 (p=0.034, 0.017, and 0.017, respectively). Contrast sensitivity showed comparable results at almost all spatial frequencies between the groups. Conclusion: Regarding visual acuity and quality, both groups showed comparable results. Co-implantation of a CTR and aberration- free monofocal IOL was associated with hyperopic refractive outcomes. Surgeons should consider the position of the IOL when planning co-implantation of a CTR and IOL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1236-1242
Number of pages7
JournalYonsei medical journal
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep

Fingerprint

Intraocular Lens Implantation
Intraocular Lenses
Cataract
Refractive Errors
Contrast Sensitivity
Anterior Chamber
Visual Acuity
Preoperative Period
Postoperative Period

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{2b9a3282a945487d91a270dec6bf062d,
title = "Effect of co-implantation of a capsular tension ring on clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with monofocal intraocular lens implantation",
abstract = "Purpose: The objective was to evaluate the effect of co-implantation of a preloaded capsular tension ring (CTR) and aberrationfree monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) on clinical outcomes and visual quality after cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent cataract surgery were randomized into two groups that were implanted with a CTR and IOL (group 1, 26 eyes) or an IOL only (group 2, 26 eyes). At 1 and 3 months after surgery, visual acuity, refractive errors, refractive prediction errors, ocular aberrations, and modulation transfer function (MTF) were analyzed. At 3 months postoperatively, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and contrast sensitivity were evaluated. Results: Group 1 showed greater hyperopic shift, which caused the refractive prediction error at 3 months after surgery to be significantly different between the two groups (p=0.049). Differences in ACD between the preoperative and postoperative periods tended to be greater in group 1 than in group 2. At 3 months postoperatively, internal MTF values at 20, 25, and 30 cycles per degree were significantly better in group 1 than in group 2 (p=0.034, 0.017, and 0.017, respectively). Contrast sensitivity showed comparable results at almost all spatial frequencies between the groups. Conclusion: Regarding visual acuity and quality, both groups showed comparable results. Co-implantation of a CTR and aberration- free monofocal IOL was associated with hyperopic refractive outcomes. Surgeons should consider the position of the IOL when planning co-implantation of a CTR and IOL.",
author = "Park, {Hyun Ju} and Hun Lee and Kim, {Do Wook} and Kim, {Eung Kweon} and Seo, {Kyoung Yul} and Kim, {Tae Im}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1236",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "1236--1242",
journal = "Yonsei Medical Journal",
issn = "0513-5796",
publisher = "Yonsei University College of Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of co-implantation of a capsular tension ring on clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with monofocal intraocular lens implantation

AU - Park, Hyun Ju

AU - Lee, Hun

AU - Kim, Do Wook

AU - Kim, Eung Kweon

AU - Seo, Kyoung Yul

AU - Kim, Tae Im

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - Purpose: The objective was to evaluate the effect of co-implantation of a preloaded capsular tension ring (CTR) and aberrationfree monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) on clinical outcomes and visual quality after cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent cataract surgery were randomized into two groups that were implanted with a CTR and IOL (group 1, 26 eyes) or an IOL only (group 2, 26 eyes). At 1 and 3 months after surgery, visual acuity, refractive errors, refractive prediction errors, ocular aberrations, and modulation transfer function (MTF) were analyzed. At 3 months postoperatively, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and contrast sensitivity were evaluated. Results: Group 1 showed greater hyperopic shift, which caused the refractive prediction error at 3 months after surgery to be significantly different between the two groups (p=0.049). Differences in ACD between the preoperative and postoperative periods tended to be greater in group 1 than in group 2. At 3 months postoperatively, internal MTF values at 20, 25, and 30 cycles per degree were significantly better in group 1 than in group 2 (p=0.034, 0.017, and 0.017, respectively). Contrast sensitivity showed comparable results at almost all spatial frequencies between the groups. Conclusion: Regarding visual acuity and quality, both groups showed comparable results. Co-implantation of a CTR and aberration- free monofocal IOL was associated with hyperopic refractive outcomes. Surgeons should consider the position of the IOL when planning co-implantation of a CTR and IOL.

AB - Purpose: The objective was to evaluate the effect of co-implantation of a preloaded capsular tension ring (CTR) and aberrationfree monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) on clinical outcomes and visual quality after cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent cataract surgery were randomized into two groups that were implanted with a CTR and IOL (group 1, 26 eyes) or an IOL only (group 2, 26 eyes). At 1 and 3 months after surgery, visual acuity, refractive errors, refractive prediction errors, ocular aberrations, and modulation transfer function (MTF) were analyzed. At 3 months postoperatively, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and contrast sensitivity were evaluated. Results: Group 1 showed greater hyperopic shift, which caused the refractive prediction error at 3 months after surgery to be significantly different between the two groups (p=0.049). Differences in ACD between the preoperative and postoperative periods tended to be greater in group 1 than in group 2. At 3 months postoperatively, internal MTF values at 20, 25, and 30 cycles per degree were significantly better in group 1 than in group 2 (p=0.034, 0.017, and 0.017, respectively). Contrast sensitivity showed comparable results at almost all spatial frequencies between the groups. Conclusion: Regarding visual acuity and quality, both groups showed comparable results. Co-implantation of a CTR and aberration- free monofocal IOL was associated with hyperopic refractive outcomes. Surgeons should consider the position of the IOL when planning co-implantation of a CTR and IOL.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978148540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978148540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1236

DO - 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1236

M3 - Article

C2 - 27401657

AN - SCOPUS:84978148540

VL - 57

SP - 1236

EP - 1242

JO - Yonsei Medical Journal

JF - Yonsei Medical Journal

SN - 0513-5796

IS - 5

ER -