Effect of delivery methods on design performance in multifamily housing projects

Changtaek Hyun, Kyuman Cho, Kyojin Koo, Taehoon Hong, Hyunseok Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Existing studies on the performance evaluation by the delivery method generally indicate that the design build (DB) method is superior to the design-bid-build (DBB) method in terms of construction duration, cost, and quality. As opposed to the performance of construction duration and cost, where quantitative evaluation is relatively possible, most performance evaluations of quality are based on interviews with the owners. Therefore, this paper aimed at evaluating the level of design performance to conduct a quantitative evaluation on the performance of quality. To achieve this goal, this paper analyzed the impact of delivery methods on design performance in terms of the quantitative evaluation based on the case studies analyzing construction drawings and specifications of public multifamily housing projects delivered through the DB and DBB methods since 2000. The Delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods were used to develop objective standards and contents for evaluating the design performance. An analysis of variance test was conducted to analyze which delivery methods would have an effect on the design performance. Construction industry practitioners can use the results of this study in selecting a delivery method appropriate to the project characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)468-482
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume134
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jun 30

Fingerprint

Analytic hierarchy process
Construction industry
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Costs
Specifications
Quantitative evaluation
Performance evaluation
Bid
Design/build
Owners
Analysis of variance
Public housing
Delphi

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Hyun, Changtaek ; Cho, Kyuman ; Koo, Kyojin ; Hong, Taehoon ; Moon, Hyunseok. / Effect of delivery methods on design performance in multifamily housing projects. In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2008 ; Vol. 134, No. 7. pp. 468-482.
@article{159399561ce745f5ab4b95172fd45624,
title = "Effect of delivery methods on design performance in multifamily housing projects",
abstract = "Existing studies on the performance evaluation by the delivery method generally indicate that the design build (DB) method is superior to the design-bid-build (DBB) method in terms of construction duration, cost, and quality. As opposed to the performance of construction duration and cost, where quantitative evaluation is relatively possible, most performance evaluations of quality are based on interviews with the owners. Therefore, this paper aimed at evaluating the level of design performance to conduct a quantitative evaluation on the performance of quality. To achieve this goal, this paper analyzed the impact of delivery methods on design performance in terms of the quantitative evaluation based on the case studies analyzing construction drawings and specifications of public multifamily housing projects delivered through the DB and DBB methods since 2000. The Delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods were used to develop objective standards and contents for evaluating the design performance. An analysis of variance test was conducted to analyze which delivery methods would have an effect on the design performance. Construction industry practitioners can use the results of this study in selecting a delivery method appropriate to the project characteristics.",
author = "Changtaek Hyun and Kyuman Cho and Kyojin Koo and Taehoon Hong and Hyunseok Moon",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(468)",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "468--482",
journal = "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9364",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "7",

}

Effect of delivery methods on design performance in multifamily housing projects. / Hyun, Changtaek; Cho, Kyuman; Koo, Kyojin; Hong, Taehoon; Moon, Hyunseok.

In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 7, 30.06.2008, p. 468-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of delivery methods on design performance in multifamily housing projects

AU - Hyun, Changtaek

AU - Cho, Kyuman

AU - Koo, Kyojin

AU - Hong, Taehoon

AU - Moon, Hyunseok

PY - 2008/6/30

Y1 - 2008/6/30

N2 - Existing studies on the performance evaluation by the delivery method generally indicate that the design build (DB) method is superior to the design-bid-build (DBB) method in terms of construction duration, cost, and quality. As opposed to the performance of construction duration and cost, where quantitative evaluation is relatively possible, most performance evaluations of quality are based on interviews with the owners. Therefore, this paper aimed at evaluating the level of design performance to conduct a quantitative evaluation on the performance of quality. To achieve this goal, this paper analyzed the impact of delivery methods on design performance in terms of the quantitative evaluation based on the case studies analyzing construction drawings and specifications of public multifamily housing projects delivered through the DB and DBB methods since 2000. The Delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods were used to develop objective standards and contents for evaluating the design performance. An analysis of variance test was conducted to analyze which delivery methods would have an effect on the design performance. Construction industry practitioners can use the results of this study in selecting a delivery method appropriate to the project characteristics.

AB - Existing studies on the performance evaluation by the delivery method generally indicate that the design build (DB) method is superior to the design-bid-build (DBB) method in terms of construction duration, cost, and quality. As opposed to the performance of construction duration and cost, where quantitative evaluation is relatively possible, most performance evaluations of quality are based on interviews with the owners. Therefore, this paper aimed at evaluating the level of design performance to conduct a quantitative evaluation on the performance of quality. To achieve this goal, this paper analyzed the impact of delivery methods on design performance in terms of the quantitative evaluation based on the case studies analyzing construction drawings and specifications of public multifamily housing projects delivered through the DB and DBB methods since 2000. The Delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods were used to develop objective standards and contents for evaluating the design performance. An analysis of variance test was conducted to analyze which delivery methods would have an effect on the design performance. Construction industry practitioners can use the results of this study in selecting a delivery method appropriate to the project characteristics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45749149571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45749149571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(468)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(468)

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:45749149571

VL - 134

SP - 468

EP - 482

JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9364

IS - 7

ER -