Effect of the type of electrical stimulation on spinal fusion in a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model

Pyung Goo Cho, Gyu Yeol Ji, Yoon Ha, Hye Yeong Lee, DongAh Shin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterolateral fusion (PLF) with autogenous iliac bone graft is one of the most common surgical procedures for lumbar spinal disease. However, its limited success demands new biologically competent graft enhancers or substitutes. Although the use of direct current (DC) electrical stimulation has been shown to increase rate of successful spinal fusions, little is known about the effect of the type of current in DC stimulation. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of various DC stimulators on the strength and success rate of posterolateral fusion facilitated by using a nitinol mesh container, in rats. STUDY DESIGN: This was an experimental animal study. METHODS: A conductive, tubular nitinol mesh container was used to carry small pieces of bone grafts. The nitinol mesh container received electrical stimulation via a lead that connected the container to different types of DC stimulators. Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups (N=20 in each): a control group that underwent PLF with a nitinol container filled with autograft, a constant DC group that received a nitinol container and constant DC (100 μA), and a pulsed DC group that received a nitinol container and pulsed DC (100 μA, 100 Hz, 200 μs). The rats underwent PLF between L4 and L5, and transverse processes were grafted with bilateral iliac grafts. A stimulator was implanted subcutaneously. The rats were sacrificed 8 weeks postsurgery, and lumbar spines were removed. Spinal fusion was evaluated by microcomputed tomography, manual testing, biomechanical testing, histologic examination, and molecular analysis. RESULTS: All animals in the DC stimulation groups displayed solid fusion, whereas only 70% of control animals showed solid fusion. Radiographic images, biomechanical testing, histologic examination, and molecular analysis revealed improved fusion in the order control group<constant DC group<pulsed DC group. The volume of new bone mass was significantly higher in the pulsed DC group (p<.05). Fusion was more solid in the pulsed DC group than in control group (p<.05). The pulsed DC group displayed the lowest inflammatory responses. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed DC electrical stimulation is efficacious in improving both strength and fusion rate in a rat spinal fusion model. In addition, tubular nitinol mesh, made of conductive suture, appears useful for holding small pieces of bone grafts and maintaining a good environment for bone fusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pulsed DC electrical stimulation may be potentially useful to increase the fusion rate after spinal fusion in humans. Future research is required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tubular nitinol mesh and pulsed DC electrical stimulation in humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1106-1120
Number of pages15
JournalSpine Journal
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Spinal Fusion
Electric Stimulation
Transplants
Bone and Bones
Control Groups
Spinal Diseases
X-Ray Microtomography
nitinol
Autografts
Sutures
Sprague Dawley Rats
Spine
Safety

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{78dc14e0c4e4403a961856630cc47845,
title = "Effect of the type of electrical stimulation on spinal fusion in a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model",
abstract = "BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterolateral fusion (PLF) with autogenous iliac bone graft is one of the most common surgical procedures for lumbar spinal disease. However, its limited success demands new biologically competent graft enhancers or substitutes. Although the use of direct current (DC) electrical stimulation has been shown to increase rate of successful spinal fusions, little is known about the effect of the type of current in DC stimulation. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of various DC stimulators on the strength and success rate of posterolateral fusion facilitated by using a nitinol mesh container, in rats. STUDY DESIGN: This was an experimental animal study. METHODS: A conductive, tubular nitinol mesh container was used to carry small pieces of bone grafts. The nitinol mesh container received electrical stimulation via a lead that connected the container to different types of DC stimulators. Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups (N=20 in each): a control group that underwent PLF with a nitinol container filled with autograft, a constant DC group that received a nitinol container and constant DC (100 μA), and a pulsed DC group that received a nitinol container and pulsed DC (100 μA, 100 Hz, 200 μs). The rats underwent PLF between L4 and L5, and transverse processes were grafted with bilateral iliac grafts. A stimulator was implanted subcutaneously. The rats were sacrificed 8 weeks postsurgery, and lumbar spines were removed. Spinal fusion was evaluated by microcomputed tomography, manual testing, biomechanical testing, histologic examination, and molecular analysis. RESULTS: All animals in the DC stimulation groups displayed solid fusion, whereas only 70{\%} of control animals showed solid fusion. Radiographic images, biomechanical testing, histologic examination, and molecular analysis revealed improved fusion in the order control group",
author = "Cho, {Pyung Goo} and Ji, {Gyu Yeol} and Yoon Ha and Lee, {Hye Yeong} and DongAh Shin",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.011",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1106--1120",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Effect of the type of electrical stimulation on spinal fusion in a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model. / Cho, Pyung Goo; Ji, Gyu Yeol; Ha, Yoon; Lee, Hye Yeong; Shin, DongAh.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 19, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 1106-1120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of the type of electrical stimulation on spinal fusion in a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model

AU - Cho, Pyung Goo

AU - Ji, Gyu Yeol

AU - Ha, Yoon

AU - Lee, Hye Yeong

AU - Shin, DongAh

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterolateral fusion (PLF) with autogenous iliac bone graft is one of the most common surgical procedures for lumbar spinal disease. However, its limited success demands new biologically competent graft enhancers or substitutes. Although the use of direct current (DC) electrical stimulation has been shown to increase rate of successful spinal fusions, little is known about the effect of the type of current in DC stimulation. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of various DC stimulators on the strength and success rate of posterolateral fusion facilitated by using a nitinol mesh container, in rats. STUDY DESIGN: This was an experimental animal study. METHODS: A conductive, tubular nitinol mesh container was used to carry small pieces of bone grafts. The nitinol mesh container received electrical stimulation via a lead that connected the container to different types of DC stimulators. Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups (N=20 in each): a control group that underwent PLF with a nitinol container filled with autograft, a constant DC group that received a nitinol container and constant DC (100 μA), and a pulsed DC group that received a nitinol container and pulsed DC (100 μA, 100 Hz, 200 μs). The rats underwent PLF between L4 and L5, and transverse processes were grafted with bilateral iliac grafts. A stimulator was implanted subcutaneously. The rats were sacrificed 8 weeks postsurgery, and lumbar spines were removed. Spinal fusion was evaluated by microcomputed tomography, manual testing, biomechanical testing, histologic examination, and molecular analysis. RESULTS: All animals in the DC stimulation groups displayed solid fusion, whereas only 70% of control animals showed solid fusion. Radiographic images, biomechanical testing, histologic examination, and molecular analysis revealed improved fusion in the order control group

AB - BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterolateral fusion (PLF) with autogenous iliac bone graft is one of the most common surgical procedures for lumbar spinal disease. However, its limited success demands new biologically competent graft enhancers or substitutes. Although the use of direct current (DC) electrical stimulation has been shown to increase rate of successful spinal fusions, little is known about the effect of the type of current in DC stimulation. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of various DC stimulators on the strength and success rate of posterolateral fusion facilitated by using a nitinol mesh container, in rats. STUDY DESIGN: This was an experimental animal study. METHODS: A conductive, tubular nitinol mesh container was used to carry small pieces of bone grafts. The nitinol mesh container received electrical stimulation via a lead that connected the container to different types of DC stimulators. Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups (N=20 in each): a control group that underwent PLF with a nitinol container filled with autograft, a constant DC group that received a nitinol container and constant DC (100 μA), and a pulsed DC group that received a nitinol container and pulsed DC (100 μA, 100 Hz, 200 μs). The rats underwent PLF between L4 and L5, and transverse processes were grafted with bilateral iliac grafts. A stimulator was implanted subcutaneously. The rats were sacrificed 8 weeks postsurgery, and lumbar spines were removed. Spinal fusion was evaluated by microcomputed tomography, manual testing, biomechanical testing, histologic examination, and molecular analysis. RESULTS: All animals in the DC stimulation groups displayed solid fusion, whereas only 70% of control animals showed solid fusion. Radiographic images, biomechanical testing, histologic examination, and molecular analysis revealed improved fusion in the order control group

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059325180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059325180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.011

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 30584910

AN - SCOPUS:85059325180

VL - 19

SP - 1106

EP - 1120

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 6

ER -