Effectiveness and safety of teneligliptin added to patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by oral triple combination therapy: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study

Minyoung Lee, Woo je Lee, Jae Hyeon Kim, Byung Wan Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of teneligliptin over placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled by triple therapy. Materials and Methods: This trial was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The 12-week double-blind period was followed by a 12-week, open-label clinical trial. One hundred patients with T2D who failed to achieve the glycaemic target (7.1% ≤ HbA1c ≤ 9.0%) with conventional triple oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) of metformin, sulphonylurea, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor were assigned randomly 1:1 into teneligliptin and placebo-teneligliptin groups. The primary endpoint was mean change in HbA1c level from baseline in each group at 12 weeks. Results: For a total of 99 patients (n = 51 for the teneligliptin group, and n = 48 for the placebo-teneligliptin group), the mean age and duration of diabetes were 60.7 and 13.6 years, respectively, and HbA1c was 7.8% at baseline. At 12 weeks, the teneligliptin group achieved a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline (−0.9% ± 0.6%, P <.001), with an intergroup difference of −0.75% compared with the placebo group (95% CI [–0.99%, –0.51%], P <.001). At the end of the 24-week treatment period, both groups showed significant reductions in HbA1c level from baseline (placebo-teneligliptin group, –0.8% ± 0.6% [P <.001], teneligliptin group, –0.9% ± 0.6% [P <.001]), without significant intergroup difference (−0.17%, 95% CI [−0.41%, 0.07%], P =.156). There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of adverse events (placebo-teneligliptin group, n = 3 [6.3%]; teneligliptin group, n = 11 [11.1%]; P =.550), and the safety profiles were favourable in both groups. Conclusions: The current study shows that teneligliptin could be a valid option as a fourth OAD for the treatment of patients with T2D inadequately controlled with a triple combination of OADs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1105-1113
Number of pages9
JournalDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022 Jun

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported by research grants from Handok Corporation (4‐2020‐0678‐001), the “SENTINEL (Severance ENdocrinology daTa scIeNcE pLatform)” programme funded by the 2020 Research fund of Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, and a Sung‐Kil Lim Research Award (4‐2018‐1215; DUCD000002) in statistical analyses.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness and safety of teneligliptin added to patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by oral triple combination therapy: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this