Efficacy of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty does not correlate with dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease

Gyu Yeul Ji, Chang Hyun Oh, Bongju Moon, Seung Hyun Choi, DongAh Shin, Young Sul Yoon, Keung Nyun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is a minimally invasive treatment. The efficacy of PEN has been relatively well investigated; however, the relationship between the clinical effectiveness of PEN and the severity of spinal canal stenosis by disc material has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of PEN according to the dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease. Materials and Methods: This study included 363 patients with back pain from single level disc disease with and without radiculopathy. Patients were categorized into groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material: Category 1, less or more than 50%; and Category 2, three subgroups with lesser than a third, between a third and two thirds, and more than two thirds. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain and Odom’s criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Results: The demographic data showed no difference between groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material except age (older age correlated with more spinal canal compromise). The dural sac cross-sectional area did not correlate with the VAS scores for back and leg pain after PEN in single level disc disease in Groups 1 and 2. Odom’s criteria after PEN were also not different according to dural sac cross-sectional area by disc material. Conclusion: PEN is an effective procedure in treating single level lumbar disc herniation without affecting dural sac cross-sectional area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-697
Number of pages7
JournalYonsei medical journal
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Spinal Canal
Back Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Leg
Spinal Stenosis
Radiculopathy
Demography
Pain
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ji, Gyu Yeul ; Oh, Chang Hyun ; Moon, Bongju ; Choi, Seung Hyun ; Shin, DongAh ; Yoon, Young Sul ; Kim, Keung Nyun. / Efficacy of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty does not correlate with dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease. In: Yonsei medical journal. 2015 ; Vol. 56, No. 3. pp. 691-697.
@article{e4412236840848f586fa65baccd5e81f,
title = "Efficacy of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty does not correlate with dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease",
abstract = "Purpose: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is a minimally invasive treatment. The efficacy of PEN has been relatively well investigated; however, the relationship between the clinical effectiveness of PEN and the severity of spinal canal stenosis by disc material has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of PEN according to the dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease. Materials and Methods: This study included 363 patients with back pain from single level disc disease with and without radiculopathy. Patients were categorized into groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material: Category 1, less or more than 50{\%}; and Category 2, three subgroups with lesser than a third, between a third and two thirds, and more than two thirds. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain and Odom’s criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Results: The demographic data showed no difference between groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material except age (older age correlated with more spinal canal compromise). The dural sac cross-sectional area did not correlate with the VAS scores for back and leg pain after PEN in single level disc disease in Groups 1 and 2. Odom’s criteria after PEN were also not different according to dural sac cross-sectional area by disc material. Conclusion: PEN is an effective procedure in treating single level lumbar disc herniation without affecting dural sac cross-sectional area.",
author = "Ji, {Gyu Yeul} and Oh, {Chang Hyun} and Bongju Moon and Choi, {Seung Hyun} and DongAh Shin and Yoon, {Young Sul} and Kim, {Keung Nyun}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.691",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "691--697",
journal = "Yonsei Medical Journal",
issn = "0513-5796",
publisher = "Yonsei University College of Medicine",
number = "3",

}

Efficacy of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty does not correlate with dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease. / Ji, Gyu Yeul; Oh, Chang Hyun; Moon, Bongju; Choi, Seung Hyun; Shin, DongAh; Yoon, Young Sul; Kim, Keung Nyun.

In: Yonsei medical journal, Vol. 56, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 691-697.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty does not correlate with dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease

AU - Ji, Gyu Yeul

AU - Oh, Chang Hyun

AU - Moon, Bongju

AU - Choi, Seung Hyun

AU - Shin, DongAh

AU - Yoon, Young Sul

AU - Kim, Keung Nyun

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is a minimally invasive treatment. The efficacy of PEN has been relatively well investigated; however, the relationship between the clinical effectiveness of PEN and the severity of spinal canal stenosis by disc material has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of PEN according to the dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease. Materials and Methods: This study included 363 patients with back pain from single level disc disease with and without radiculopathy. Patients were categorized into groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material: Category 1, less or more than 50%; and Category 2, three subgroups with lesser than a third, between a third and two thirds, and more than two thirds. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain and Odom’s criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Results: The demographic data showed no difference between groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material except age (older age correlated with more spinal canal compromise). The dural sac cross-sectional area did not correlate with the VAS scores for back and leg pain after PEN in single level disc disease in Groups 1 and 2. Odom’s criteria after PEN were also not different according to dural sac cross-sectional area by disc material. Conclusion: PEN is an effective procedure in treating single level lumbar disc herniation without affecting dural sac cross-sectional area.

AB - Purpose: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is a minimally invasive treatment. The efficacy of PEN has been relatively well investigated; however, the relationship between the clinical effectiveness of PEN and the severity of spinal canal stenosis by disc material has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of PEN according to the dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease. Materials and Methods: This study included 363 patients with back pain from single level disc disease with and without radiculopathy. Patients were categorized into groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material: Category 1, less or more than 50%; and Category 2, three subgroups with lesser than a third, between a third and two thirds, and more than two thirds. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain and Odom’s criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Results: The demographic data showed no difference between groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material except age (older age correlated with more spinal canal compromise). The dural sac cross-sectional area did not correlate with the VAS scores for back and leg pain after PEN in single level disc disease in Groups 1 and 2. Odom’s criteria after PEN were also not different according to dural sac cross-sectional area by disc material. Conclusion: PEN is an effective procedure in treating single level lumbar disc herniation without affecting dural sac cross-sectional area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926391935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926391935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.691

DO - 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.691

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 691

EP - 697

JO - Yonsei Medical Journal

JF - Yonsei Medical Journal

SN - 0513-5796

IS - 3

ER -