Efficacy of Ultrasound Doppler Flowmetry in Assessing Pulp Vitality of Traumatized Teeth

A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

So Yeon Ahn, Dohyun Kim, Sungho Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ultrasound Doppler flowmetry (UDF) with that of electric pulp testing (EPT) in assessing pulp vitality in traumatized teeth. Methods: A total of 246 teeth from 78 patients who visited the authors' hospital with histories of dental trauma between February 2012 and May 2015 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the diagnostic method used to determine pulp vitality during the follow-up visits. In the control group, EPT alone was used to assess pulp vitality, whereas both UDF and EPT were used in the UDF group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed after propensity score matching. Survival was defined as the tooth not having to undergo root canal treatment. Additionally, the McNemar test was used to compare the results of UDF with those of EPT in the UDF group. Results: After propensity score matching, 69 teeth were included in each group. The pulp survival rates at 1 year were 74% and 90% in the control and UDF groups, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant (P <.01). In the UDF group, there was a significant difference between the UDF and EPT results at all follow-up evaluations (P <.001). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, UDF appeared to be more sensitive in assessing pulp vitality in traumatized teeth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-383
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Doppler Ultrasonography
Propensity Score
Rheology
Tooth
Dental Pulp Cavity
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Survival Analysis
Survival Rate
Retrospective Studies
Control Groups
Survival

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{b92f9823154f42999b2ac5423b889782,
title = "Efficacy of Ultrasound Doppler Flowmetry in Assessing Pulp Vitality of Traumatized Teeth: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis",
abstract = "Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ultrasound Doppler flowmetry (UDF) with that of electric pulp testing (EPT) in assessing pulp vitality in traumatized teeth. Methods: A total of 246 teeth from 78 patients who visited the authors' hospital with histories of dental trauma between February 2012 and May 2015 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the diagnostic method used to determine pulp vitality during the follow-up visits. In the control group, EPT alone was used to assess pulp vitality, whereas both UDF and EPT were used in the UDF group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed after propensity score matching. Survival was defined as the tooth not having to undergo root canal treatment. Additionally, the McNemar test was used to compare the results of UDF with those of EPT in the UDF group. Results: After propensity score matching, 69 teeth were included in each group. The pulp survival rates at 1 year were 74{\%} and 90{\%} in the control and UDF groups, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant (P <.01). In the UDF group, there was a significant difference between the UDF and EPT results at all follow-up evaluations (P <.001). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, UDF appeared to be more sensitive in assessing pulp vitality in traumatized teeth.",
author = "Ahn, {So Yeon} and Dohyun Kim and Sungho Park",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.004",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "379--383",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Efficacy of Ultrasound Doppler Flowmetry in Assessing Pulp Vitality of Traumatized Teeth : A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. / Ahn, So Yeon; Kim, Dohyun; Park, Sungho.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 379-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of Ultrasound Doppler Flowmetry in Assessing Pulp Vitality of Traumatized Teeth

T2 - A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

AU - Ahn, So Yeon

AU - Kim, Dohyun

AU - Park, Sungho

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ultrasound Doppler flowmetry (UDF) with that of electric pulp testing (EPT) in assessing pulp vitality in traumatized teeth. Methods: A total of 246 teeth from 78 patients who visited the authors' hospital with histories of dental trauma between February 2012 and May 2015 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the diagnostic method used to determine pulp vitality during the follow-up visits. In the control group, EPT alone was used to assess pulp vitality, whereas both UDF and EPT were used in the UDF group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed after propensity score matching. Survival was defined as the tooth not having to undergo root canal treatment. Additionally, the McNemar test was used to compare the results of UDF with those of EPT in the UDF group. Results: After propensity score matching, 69 teeth were included in each group. The pulp survival rates at 1 year were 74% and 90% in the control and UDF groups, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant (P <.01). In the UDF group, there was a significant difference between the UDF and EPT results at all follow-up evaluations (P <.001). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, UDF appeared to be more sensitive in assessing pulp vitality in traumatized teeth.

AB - Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ultrasound Doppler flowmetry (UDF) with that of electric pulp testing (EPT) in assessing pulp vitality in traumatized teeth. Methods: A total of 246 teeth from 78 patients who visited the authors' hospital with histories of dental trauma between February 2012 and May 2015 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the diagnostic method used to determine pulp vitality during the follow-up visits. In the control group, EPT alone was used to assess pulp vitality, whereas both UDF and EPT were used in the UDF group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed after propensity score matching. Survival was defined as the tooth not having to undergo root canal treatment. Additionally, the McNemar test was used to compare the results of UDF with those of EPT in the UDF group. Results: After propensity score matching, 69 teeth were included in each group. The pulp survival rates at 1 year were 74% and 90% in the control and UDF groups, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant (P <.01). In the UDF group, there was a significant difference between the UDF and EPT results at all follow-up evaluations (P <.001). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, UDF appeared to be more sensitive in assessing pulp vitality in traumatized teeth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044282679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044282679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.004

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 379

EP - 383

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 3

ER -