Endoscopic axillo-breast approach for benign neck mass excision

Yoo Seob Shin, Hyun Pil Chung, Hyang Ae Shin, Hyun Jin Lee, Yoon Woo Koh, Eun Chang Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Benign neck masses are usually found in younger patients, who are more likely to be concerned about postoperative scars. Until recently, a direct approach through a transcervical incision along the mass has been accepted as a standard surgical procedure for the benign neck mass. However, this conventional transcervical approach leaves a visible scar on the neck, regardless of the size of the incision. We assumed that an endoscopic gasless axillo-breast (A-B) approach might be a good alternative method for excision of benign neck masses. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of a gasless A-B approach for the excision of benign neck masses by comparing it to the conventional open approach. Study Design: Case series. Methods: We prospectively compared the outcomes of endoscopic removal of benign neck lesions with the outcomes of conventional open surgery. Results: Most patients in the endoscopy group were women, and the mean age was younger than in the open group. Although operative time was longer and amount of drainage was larger in the endoscopy group, there was no statistically significant difference in duration of drainage, hospitalization period, complication rate, and pain score. Endoscopically treated patients were more satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the surgery than patients in the conventional open group. Conclusions: Endoscopic excision via an A-B approach without gas insufflation could be a good substitute for conventional transcervical excision in selected cases of benign neck lesion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)559-564
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume122
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Breast
Neck
Endoscopy
Cicatrix
Drainage
Insufflation
Plastic Surgery
Operative Time
Hospitalization
Gases
Safety
Pain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Shin, Y. S., Chung, H. P., Shin, H. A., Lee, H. J., Koh, Y. W., & Choi, E. C. (2012). Endoscopic axillo-breast approach for benign neck mass excision. Laryngoscope, 122(3), 559-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.22462
Shin, Yoo Seob ; Chung, Hyun Pil ; Shin, Hyang Ae ; Lee, Hyun Jin ; Koh, Yoon Woo ; Choi, Eun Chang. / Endoscopic axillo-breast approach for benign neck mass excision. In: Laryngoscope. 2012 ; Vol. 122, No. 3. pp. 559-564.
@article{f011f4e77ca14a3f99605ad864a0b1dc,
title = "Endoscopic axillo-breast approach for benign neck mass excision",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Benign neck masses are usually found in younger patients, who are more likely to be concerned about postoperative scars. Until recently, a direct approach through a transcervical incision along the mass has been accepted as a standard surgical procedure for the benign neck mass. However, this conventional transcervical approach leaves a visible scar on the neck, regardless of the size of the incision. We assumed that an endoscopic gasless axillo-breast (A-B) approach might be a good alternative method for excision of benign neck masses. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of a gasless A-B approach for the excision of benign neck masses by comparing it to the conventional open approach. Study Design: Case series. Methods: We prospectively compared the outcomes of endoscopic removal of benign neck lesions with the outcomes of conventional open surgery. Results: Most patients in the endoscopy group were women, and the mean age was younger than in the open group. Although operative time was longer and amount of drainage was larger in the endoscopy group, there was no statistically significant difference in duration of drainage, hospitalization period, complication rate, and pain score. Endoscopically treated patients were more satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the surgery than patients in the conventional open group. Conclusions: Endoscopic excision via an A-B approach without gas insufflation could be a good substitute for conventional transcervical excision in selected cases of benign neck lesion.",
author = "Shin, {Yoo Seob} and Chung, {Hyun Pil} and Shin, {Hyang Ae} and Lee, {Hyun Jin} and Koh, {Yoon Woo} and Choi, {Eun Chang}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.22462",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "559--564",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Shin, YS, Chung, HP, Shin, HA, Lee, HJ, Koh, YW & Choi, EC 2012, 'Endoscopic axillo-breast approach for benign neck mass excision', Laryngoscope, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 559-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.22462

Endoscopic axillo-breast approach for benign neck mass excision. / Shin, Yoo Seob; Chung, Hyun Pil; Shin, Hyang Ae; Lee, Hyun Jin; Koh, Yoon Woo; Choi, Eun Chang.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 122, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 559-564.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic axillo-breast approach for benign neck mass excision

AU - Shin, Yoo Seob

AU - Chung, Hyun Pil

AU - Shin, Hyang Ae

AU - Lee, Hyun Jin

AU - Koh, Yoon Woo

AU - Choi, Eun Chang

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Benign neck masses are usually found in younger patients, who are more likely to be concerned about postoperative scars. Until recently, a direct approach through a transcervical incision along the mass has been accepted as a standard surgical procedure for the benign neck mass. However, this conventional transcervical approach leaves a visible scar on the neck, regardless of the size of the incision. We assumed that an endoscopic gasless axillo-breast (A-B) approach might be a good alternative method for excision of benign neck masses. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of a gasless A-B approach for the excision of benign neck masses by comparing it to the conventional open approach. Study Design: Case series. Methods: We prospectively compared the outcomes of endoscopic removal of benign neck lesions with the outcomes of conventional open surgery. Results: Most patients in the endoscopy group were women, and the mean age was younger than in the open group. Although operative time was longer and amount of drainage was larger in the endoscopy group, there was no statistically significant difference in duration of drainage, hospitalization period, complication rate, and pain score. Endoscopically treated patients were more satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the surgery than patients in the conventional open group. Conclusions: Endoscopic excision via an A-B approach without gas insufflation could be a good substitute for conventional transcervical excision in selected cases of benign neck lesion.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Benign neck masses are usually found in younger patients, who are more likely to be concerned about postoperative scars. Until recently, a direct approach through a transcervical incision along the mass has been accepted as a standard surgical procedure for the benign neck mass. However, this conventional transcervical approach leaves a visible scar on the neck, regardless of the size of the incision. We assumed that an endoscopic gasless axillo-breast (A-B) approach might be a good alternative method for excision of benign neck masses. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of a gasless A-B approach for the excision of benign neck masses by comparing it to the conventional open approach. Study Design: Case series. Methods: We prospectively compared the outcomes of endoscopic removal of benign neck lesions with the outcomes of conventional open surgery. Results: Most patients in the endoscopy group were women, and the mean age was younger than in the open group. Although operative time was longer and amount of drainage was larger in the endoscopy group, there was no statistically significant difference in duration of drainage, hospitalization period, complication rate, and pain score. Endoscopically treated patients were more satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the surgery than patients in the conventional open group. Conclusions: Endoscopic excision via an A-B approach without gas insufflation could be a good substitute for conventional transcervical excision in selected cases of benign neck lesion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862829683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862829683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.22462

DO - 10.1002/lary.22462

M3 - Article

C2 - 22252907

AN - SCOPUS:84862829683

VL - 122

SP - 559

EP - 564

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 3

ER -