Endovascular treatment decision in acute stroke: Does physician gender matter? Insights from UNMASK EVT, an international, multidisciplinary survey

Johanna Maria Ospel, Nima Kashani, Alexis T. Wilson, Urs Fischer, Bruce C.V. Campbell, Pillai N. Sylaja, Shinichi Yoshimura, Alejandro A. Rabinstein, Francis Turjman, Peter Mitchell, Byung Moon Kim, Mathew P. Cherian, Ji Hoe Heo, Blaise W. Baxter, Anna Podlasek, Mona Foss, Bijoy K. Menon, Mohammed A. Almekhlafi, Andrew M. Demchuk, Michael D. HillGustavo Saposnik, Mayank Goyal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose Differences in the treatment practice of female and male physicians have been shown in several medical subspecialties. It is currently not known whether this also applies to endovascular stroke treatment. The purpose of this study was to explore whether there are differences in endovascular treatment decisions made by female and male stroke physicians and neurointerventionalists. Methods In an international survey, stroke physicians and neurointerventionalists were randomly assigned 10 case scenarios and asked how they would treat the patient: (A) assuming there were no external constraints and (B) given their local working conditions. Descriptive statistics were used to describe baseline demographics, and the adjusted OR for physician gender as a predictor of endovascular treatment decision was calculated using logistic regression. Results 607 physicians (97 women, 508 men, 2 who did not wish to declare) participated in this survey. Physician gender was neither a significant predictor for endovascular treatment decision under assumed ideal conditions (endovascular therapy was favored by 77.0% of female and 79.3% of male physicians, adjusted OR 1.03, P=0.806) nor under current local resources (endovascular therapy was favored by 69.1% of female and 76.9% of male physicians, adjusted OR 1.03, P=0.814). Conclusion Endovascular therapy decision making between male and female physicians did not differ under assumed ideal conditions or under current local resources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-259
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Mar 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Endovascular treatment decision in acute stroke: Does physician gender matter? Insights from UNMASK EVT, an international, multidisciplinary survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Ospel, J. M., Kashani, N., Wilson, A. T., Fischer, U., Campbell, B. C. V., Sylaja, P. N., Yoshimura, S., Rabinstein, A. A., Turjman, F., Mitchell, P., Kim, B. M., Cherian, M. P., Heo, J. H., Baxter, B. W., Podlasek, A., Foss, M., Menon, B. K., Almekhlafi, M. A., Demchuk, A. M., ... Goyal, M. (2020). Endovascular treatment decision in acute stroke: Does physician gender matter? Insights from UNMASK EVT, an international, multidisciplinary survey. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 12(3), 256-259. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015003