Evaluating new weapon systems technology: The Javelin versus the Dragon

David Anthony Cannella, So Young Sohn, Charles Pate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To achieve its missions, the US Army needs to take advantage of improvements in weapons technology. To replace the medium antiarmor Dragon weapon system, the army is testing a new system called Javelin. We used simulation to explore Javelin's potential to enhance the effectiveness of the mechanized infantry. We developed scenarios employing the Janus(A) high-resolution combat model. These scenarios represent force-on-force trials of mechanized versus fully modernized armor heavy threats in deliberate defense and movement-to-contact missions. Our results indicate that the Javelin performs better than the Dragon in mechanized force. These findings and related study results led to the US Army's decision to replace the Dragon with the Javelin in its mechanized infantry units.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-38
Number of pages10
JournalInterfaces
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Armor
Testing
Scenarios
Technology system
Threat
Simulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Cannella, David Anthony ; Sohn, So Young ; Pate, Charles. / Evaluating new weapon systems technology : The Javelin versus the Dragon. In: Interfaces. 1997 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 29-38.
@article{bd2f4df92669457d841bcae6c6c51ba0,
title = "Evaluating new weapon systems technology: The Javelin versus the Dragon",
abstract = "To achieve its missions, the US Army needs to take advantage of improvements in weapons technology. To replace the medium antiarmor Dragon weapon system, the army is testing a new system called Javelin. We used simulation to explore Javelin's potential to enhance the effectiveness of the mechanized infantry. We developed scenarios employing the Janus(A) high-resolution combat model. These scenarios represent force-on-force trials of mechanized versus fully modernized armor heavy threats in deliberate defense and movement-to-contact missions. Our results indicate that the Javelin performs better than the Dragon in mechanized force. These findings and related study results led to the US Army's decision to replace the Dragon with the Javelin in its mechanized infantry units.",
author = "Cannella, {David Anthony} and Sohn, {So Young} and Charles Pate",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/inte.27.3.29",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "29--38",
journal = "Interfaces",
issn = "0092-2102",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "3",

}

Evaluating new weapon systems technology : The Javelin versus the Dragon. / Cannella, David Anthony; Sohn, So Young; Pate, Charles.

In: Interfaces, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.01.1997, p. 29-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating new weapon systems technology

T2 - The Javelin versus the Dragon

AU - Cannella, David Anthony

AU - Sohn, So Young

AU - Pate, Charles

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - To achieve its missions, the US Army needs to take advantage of improvements in weapons technology. To replace the medium antiarmor Dragon weapon system, the army is testing a new system called Javelin. We used simulation to explore Javelin's potential to enhance the effectiveness of the mechanized infantry. We developed scenarios employing the Janus(A) high-resolution combat model. These scenarios represent force-on-force trials of mechanized versus fully modernized armor heavy threats in deliberate defense and movement-to-contact missions. Our results indicate that the Javelin performs better than the Dragon in mechanized force. These findings and related study results led to the US Army's decision to replace the Dragon with the Javelin in its mechanized infantry units.

AB - To achieve its missions, the US Army needs to take advantage of improvements in weapons technology. To replace the medium antiarmor Dragon weapon system, the army is testing a new system called Javelin. We used simulation to explore Javelin's potential to enhance the effectiveness of the mechanized infantry. We developed scenarios employing the Janus(A) high-resolution combat model. These scenarios represent force-on-force trials of mechanized versus fully modernized armor heavy threats in deliberate defense and movement-to-contact missions. Our results indicate that the Javelin performs better than the Dragon in mechanized force. These findings and related study results led to the US Army's decision to replace the Dragon with the Javelin in its mechanized infantry units.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041195233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041195233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/inte.27.3.29

DO - 10.1287/inte.27.3.29

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041195233

VL - 27

SP - 29

EP - 38

JO - Interfaces

JF - Interfaces

SN - 0092-2102

IS - 3

ER -