TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of a new scoring system for retinal nerve fiber layer photography using HRA1 in 964 eyes.
AU - Hong, Samin
AU - Moon, Jong Wook
AU - Ha, Seung Joo
AU - Kim, Chan Yun
AU - Seong, Gong Je
AU - Hong, Young Jae
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect by a new scoring system for RNFL photography using the Heidelberg Retina Angiograph 1 (HRA1). METHODS: This retrospective study included 128 healthy eyes and 836 primary open-angle glaucoma eyes. The RNFL photography using HRA1 was interpreted using a new scoring system, and correlated with visual field indices of standard automated perimetry (SAP). Using the presence of RNFL defect, darkness, width, and location, we established the new scoring system of RNFL photos. RESULTS: The mean RNFL defect score I in the early, moderate, severe, and control groups were 7.3, 9.2, 10.4, and 3.6, respectively. The mean RNFL defect score II in the early, moderate, severe, and control groups were 14.5, 28.5, 43.4, and 3.4, respectively. Correlations between the RNFL defect score II and the mean deviation of SAP was the strongest of the various combinations (r=-0.675, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using a new scoring system, we propose a method for semi-quantitative interpretation of RNFL photographs. This scoring system may be helpful to distinguish between normal and glaucomatous eyes, and the score is associated with the severity of visual field loss.
AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect by a new scoring system for RNFL photography using the Heidelberg Retina Angiograph 1 (HRA1). METHODS: This retrospective study included 128 healthy eyes and 836 primary open-angle glaucoma eyes. The RNFL photography using HRA1 was interpreted using a new scoring system, and correlated with visual field indices of standard automated perimetry (SAP). Using the presence of RNFL defect, darkness, width, and location, we established the new scoring system of RNFL photos. RESULTS: The mean RNFL defect score I in the early, moderate, severe, and control groups were 7.3, 9.2, 10.4, and 3.6, respectively. The mean RNFL defect score II in the early, moderate, severe, and control groups were 14.5, 28.5, 43.4, and 3.4, respectively. Correlations between the RNFL defect score II and the mean deviation of SAP was the strongest of the various combinations (r=-0.675, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using a new scoring system, we propose a method for semi-quantitative interpretation of RNFL photographs. This scoring system may be helpful to distinguish between normal and glaucomatous eyes, and the score is associated with the severity of visual field loss.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41649085060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41649085060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3341/kjo.2007.21.4.216
DO - 10.3341/kjo.2007.21.4.216
M3 - Article
C2 - 18063886
AN - SCOPUS:41649085060
SN - 1011-8942
VL - 21
SP - 216
EP - 221
JO - Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO
JF - Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO
IS - 4
ER -