Evaluation of multiple PRPs’ contributions to soil contamination in reclaimed sites around an abandoned smelter

Woosik Shin, Sungwook Choung, Weon Shik Han, Jeonghwan Hwang, Gyeongmin Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although soil contamination must be remediated by the polluters under current legal frameworks in numerous countries, the allocation of responsibilities for soil clean-up is still challenging in the case of multiple potentially responsible parties (PRPs). This study evaluated the individual contributions of two PRPs (Owners A & B) to heavy metal contamination in the soil environment near an abandoned smelter and compared the results with those from the conventional Gore Factor (GF) method. The soil in the study area was widely contaminated by various heavy metals. In particular, the arsenic concentration exceeded the local regulatory level of 25 mg kg−1 at all investigated sites. Arsenic components were frequently observed in the form of iron oxides, and they decreased with increasing distance from the smelter chimney. This distribution supported the premise that the arsenic mainly originated from the chimney through oxidation processes of iron-containing ores under high temperature. The GF results attributed greater responsibility to Owner A than Owner B, while the estimated arsenic masses (based on the field investigation) indicated the contrary. These results could be caused by insufficient information for the GF evaluation, because the change in smelter ownership and long history of contamination obscure important data, such as the amount of total refined ores and the efficiency of air pollution prevention facilities in the smelter. Therefore, more field-based approaches must be considered more importantly for the evaluation of multiple PRPs’ remediation responsibilities, especially in areas with long-term contamination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)314-321
Number of pages8
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume642
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Nov 15

Fingerprint

Arsenic
arsenic
Contamination
Soils
Chimneys
Heavy Metals
Ores
Heavy metals
soil
heavy metal
iron ore
Remediation
Air pollution
Iron oxides
iron oxide
ownership
legislation
remediation
atmospheric pollution
Iron

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Cite this

Shin, Woosik ; Choung, Sungwook ; Han, Weon Shik ; Hwang, Jeonghwan ; Kang, Gyeongmin. / Evaluation of multiple PRPs’ contributions to soil contamination in reclaimed sites around an abandoned smelter. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2018 ; Vol. 642. pp. 314-321.
@article{e45330a7b4d144ee8dc26f1381234f26,
title = "Evaluation of multiple PRPs’ contributions to soil contamination in reclaimed sites around an abandoned smelter",
abstract = "Although soil contamination must be remediated by the polluters under current legal frameworks in numerous countries, the allocation of responsibilities for soil clean-up is still challenging in the case of multiple potentially responsible parties (PRPs). This study evaluated the individual contributions of two PRPs (Owners A & B) to heavy metal contamination in the soil environment near an abandoned smelter and compared the results with those from the conventional Gore Factor (GF) method. The soil in the study area was widely contaminated by various heavy metals. In particular, the arsenic concentration exceeded the local regulatory level of 25 mg kg−1 at all investigated sites. Arsenic components were frequently observed in the form of iron oxides, and they decreased with increasing distance from the smelter chimney. This distribution supported the premise that the arsenic mainly originated from the chimney through oxidation processes of iron-containing ores under high temperature. The GF results attributed greater responsibility to Owner A than Owner B, while the estimated arsenic masses (based on the field investigation) indicated the contrary. These results could be caused by insufficient information for the GF evaluation, because the change in smelter ownership and long history of contamination obscure important data, such as the amount of total refined ores and the efficiency of air pollution prevention facilities in the smelter. Therefore, more field-based approaches must be considered more importantly for the evaluation of multiple PRPs’ remediation responsibilities, especially in areas with long-term contamination.",
author = "Woosik Shin and Sungwook Choung and Han, {Weon Shik} and Jeonghwan Hwang and Gyeongmin Kang",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.031",
language = "English",
volume = "642",
pages = "314--321",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Evaluation of multiple PRPs’ contributions to soil contamination in reclaimed sites around an abandoned smelter. / Shin, Woosik; Choung, Sungwook; Han, Weon Shik; Hwang, Jeonghwan; Kang, Gyeongmin.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 642, 15.11.2018, p. 314-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of multiple PRPs’ contributions to soil contamination in reclaimed sites around an abandoned smelter

AU - Shin, Woosik

AU - Choung, Sungwook

AU - Han, Weon Shik

AU - Hwang, Jeonghwan

AU - Kang, Gyeongmin

PY - 2018/11/15

Y1 - 2018/11/15

N2 - Although soil contamination must be remediated by the polluters under current legal frameworks in numerous countries, the allocation of responsibilities for soil clean-up is still challenging in the case of multiple potentially responsible parties (PRPs). This study evaluated the individual contributions of two PRPs (Owners A & B) to heavy metal contamination in the soil environment near an abandoned smelter and compared the results with those from the conventional Gore Factor (GF) method. The soil in the study area was widely contaminated by various heavy metals. In particular, the arsenic concentration exceeded the local regulatory level of 25 mg kg−1 at all investigated sites. Arsenic components were frequently observed in the form of iron oxides, and they decreased with increasing distance from the smelter chimney. This distribution supported the premise that the arsenic mainly originated from the chimney through oxidation processes of iron-containing ores under high temperature. The GF results attributed greater responsibility to Owner A than Owner B, while the estimated arsenic masses (based on the field investigation) indicated the contrary. These results could be caused by insufficient information for the GF evaluation, because the change in smelter ownership and long history of contamination obscure important data, such as the amount of total refined ores and the efficiency of air pollution prevention facilities in the smelter. Therefore, more field-based approaches must be considered more importantly for the evaluation of multiple PRPs’ remediation responsibilities, especially in areas with long-term contamination.

AB - Although soil contamination must be remediated by the polluters under current legal frameworks in numerous countries, the allocation of responsibilities for soil clean-up is still challenging in the case of multiple potentially responsible parties (PRPs). This study evaluated the individual contributions of two PRPs (Owners A & B) to heavy metal contamination in the soil environment near an abandoned smelter and compared the results with those from the conventional Gore Factor (GF) method. The soil in the study area was widely contaminated by various heavy metals. In particular, the arsenic concentration exceeded the local regulatory level of 25 mg kg−1 at all investigated sites. Arsenic components were frequently observed in the form of iron oxides, and they decreased with increasing distance from the smelter chimney. This distribution supported the premise that the arsenic mainly originated from the chimney through oxidation processes of iron-containing ores under high temperature. The GF results attributed greater responsibility to Owner A than Owner B, while the estimated arsenic masses (based on the field investigation) indicated the contrary. These results could be caused by insufficient information for the GF evaluation, because the change in smelter ownership and long history of contamination obscure important data, such as the amount of total refined ores and the efficiency of air pollution prevention facilities in the smelter. Therefore, more field-based approaches must be considered more importantly for the evaluation of multiple PRPs’ remediation responsibilities, especially in areas with long-term contamination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048299966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048299966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.031

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.031

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048299966

VL - 642

SP - 314

EP - 321

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -