Evaluation of scientific programs at a large-scale academic congress: Lessons from the 22nd world congress of dermatology

Hyun Sun Yoon, Oh Sang Kwon, Jiwon Lee, Jwa Seop Shin, Seunghee Lee, Soo Chan Kim, Jean Hilaire Saurat, Wolfram Sterry, Hee Chul Eun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The organization of a scientific program and the arrangement of the speakers require a considerable amount of time and effort. However, little is known about how to reinforce the participants' satisfaction with scientific programs at a large-scale academic congress with multiple parallel sessions. Objectives: This study had three main purposes: (1) to create a reference for future congresses, (2) to determine session popularity and participation rate, and (3) to identify which characteristics of sessions can affect the perception of the audience. Methods: A total of 216 scientific sessions during the 22nd World Congress of Dermatology were evaluated using printed evaluation surveys. Results: The average scores for all sessions and speakers were relatively high. There were significant differences in the numbers of total session scores, collected surveys and speakers for each session category. The number of speakers at each session was not related to the session results. It was found that among the three different session grades (excellent, fair and poor), the proportion of speakers of each grade especially contributed to the perceived quality of the poor-grade sessions. Conclusions: This survey will help to organize scientific sessions and improve the quality of academic congresses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-45
Number of pages8
JournalDermatology
Volume224
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 May

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dermatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of scientific programs at a large-scale academic congress: Lessons from the 22nd world congress of dermatology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this