Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: Evidence for adaptive criterion learning

Sanghoon Han, Ian G. Dobbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recognition models often assume that subjects use specific evidence values (decision criteria) to adaptively parse continuous memory evidence into response categories (e.g., "old," "new"). Although explicit pretest instructions influence criterion placement, these criteria appear extremely resistant to change once testing begins. We tested criterion sensitivity to local feedback using a novel biased-feedback technique designed to tacitly encourage certain errors by indicating they are the correct choices. Experiment 1 demonstrated that fully correct feedback had little effect on criterion placement, whereas biased feedback during Experiments 2 and 3 yielded prominent, durable, and adaptive criterion shifts, with observers reporting that they were unaware of the manipulation in Experiment 3. These data suggest that recognition criteria can be easily modified during testing through a form of feedback learning that operates independently of stimulus characteristics and observers' awareness of the nature of the manipulation. This mechanism may be fundamentally different from criterion shifts following explicit instructions and warnings, or shifts linked to manipulations of stimulus characteristics combined with feedback highlighting those manipulations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)703-715
Number of pages13
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Learning
Recognition (Psychology)
Rigidity
Testing
Manipulation
Experiment
Observer
Stimulus
Explicit Instruction
Placement

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{63e5a31b366943d2a7b352f6ba0196e5,
title = "Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: Evidence for adaptive criterion learning",
abstract = "Recognition models often assume that subjects use specific evidence values (decision criteria) to adaptively parse continuous memory evidence into response categories (e.g., {"}old,{"} {"}new{"}). Although explicit pretest instructions influence criterion placement, these criteria appear extremely resistant to change once testing begins. We tested criterion sensitivity to local feedback using a novel biased-feedback technique designed to tacitly encourage certain errors by indicating they are the correct choices. Experiment 1 demonstrated that fully correct feedback had little effect on criterion placement, whereas biased feedback during Experiments 2 and 3 yielded prominent, durable, and adaptive criterion shifts, with observers reporting that they were unaware of the manipulation in Experiment 3. These data suggest that recognition criteria can be easily modified during testing through a form of feedback learning that operates independently of stimulus characteristics and observers' awareness of the nature of the manipulation. This mechanism may be fundamentally different from criterion shifts following explicit instructions and warnings, or shifts linked to manipulations of stimulus characteristics combined with feedback highlighting those manipulations.",
author = "Sanghoon Han and Dobbins, {Ian G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/MC.36.4.703",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "703--715",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique : Evidence for adaptive criterion learning. / Han, Sanghoon; Dobbins, Ian G.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.06.2008, p. 703-715.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique

T2 - Evidence for adaptive criterion learning

AU - Han, Sanghoon

AU - Dobbins, Ian G.

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - Recognition models often assume that subjects use specific evidence values (decision criteria) to adaptively parse continuous memory evidence into response categories (e.g., "old," "new"). Although explicit pretest instructions influence criterion placement, these criteria appear extremely resistant to change once testing begins. We tested criterion sensitivity to local feedback using a novel biased-feedback technique designed to tacitly encourage certain errors by indicating they are the correct choices. Experiment 1 demonstrated that fully correct feedback had little effect on criterion placement, whereas biased feedback during Experiments 2 and 3 yielded prominent, durable, and adaptive criterion shifts, with observers reporting that they were unaware of the manipulation in Experiment 3. These data suggest that recognition criteria can be easily modified during testing through a form of feedback learning that operates independently of stimulus characteristics and observers' awareness of the nature of the manipulation. This mechanism may be fundamentally different from criterion shifts following explicit instructions and warnings, or shifts linked to manipulations of stimulus characteristics combined with feedback highlighting those manipulations.

AB - Recognition models often assume that subjects use specific evidence values (decision criteria) to adaptively parse continuous memory evidence into response categories (e.g., "old," "new"). Although explicit pretest instructions influence criterion placement, these criteria appear extremely resistant to change once testing begins. We tested criterion sensitivity to local feedback using a novel biased-feedback technique designed to tacitly encourage certain errors by indicating they are the correct choices. Experiment 1 demonstrated that fully correct feedback had little effect on criterion placement, whereas biased feedback during Experiments 2 and 3 yielded prominent, durable, and adaptive criterion shifts, with observers reporting that they were unaware of the manipulation in Experiment 3. These data suggest that recognition criteria can be easily modified during testing through a form of feedback learning that operates independently of stimulus characteristics and observers' awareness of the nature of the manipulation. This mechanism may be fundamentally different from criterion shifts following explicit instructions and warnings, or shifts linked to manipulations of stimulus characteristics combined with feedback highlighting those manipulations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46449094035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46449094035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/MC.36.4.703

DO - 10.3758/MC.36.4.703

M3 - Article

C2 - 18604954

AN - SCOPUS:46449094035

VL - 36

SP - 703

EP - 715

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 4

ER -