TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with prior trastuzumab use in the ATTRACTION-2 trial
T2 - a randomized phase III clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer
AU - Satoh, Taroh
AU - Kang, Yoon Koo
AU - Chao, Yee
AU - Ryu, Min Hee
AU - Kato, Ken
AU - Cheol Chung, Hyun
AU - Chen, Jen Shi
AU - Muro, Kei
AU - Ki Kang, Won
AU - Yeh, Kun Huei
AU - Yoshikawa, Takaki
AU - Oh, Sang Cheul
AU - Bai, Li Yuan
AU - Tamura, Takao
AU - Lee, Keun Wook
AU - Hamamoto, Yasuo
AU - Kim, Jong Gwang
AU - Chin, Keisho
AU - Oh, Do Youn
AU - Minashi, Keiko
AU - Cho, Jae Yong
AU - Tsuda, Masahiro
AU - Tanimoto, Mitsunobu
AU - Chen, Li Tzong
AU - Boku, Narikazu
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the patients and their families as well as the investigators and participating study teams for making this study possible. Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Ruhi Ubale, PhD, of Cactus Communications, funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc., Princeton, NJ.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Background: Data on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer are lacking. Because HER2 status was not captured in the ATTRACTION-2 trial, we used patients with prior trastuzumab use (Tmab+) as surrogate for HER2 expression status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as third- or later-line therapy in these patients. Methods: In ATTRACTION-2, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 multicenter trial, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks until disease progression or toxicity requiring study discontinuation. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were assessed. Results: Of 493 enrolled patients, 81 (nivolumab, n = 59; placebo, n = 22) were Tmab+ and 412 (nivolumab, n = 271; placebo, n = 141) were Tmab−. In both groups, patients receiving nivolumab showed a longer median OS vs placebo (Tmab+, 8.3 [95% confidence interval, 5.3–12.9] vs 3.1 [1.9–5.3] months, hazard ratio, 0.38 [0.22–0.66]; P = 0.0006; Tmab−, 4.8 [4.1–6.0] vs 4.2 [3.6–4.9] months, 0.71 [0.57–0.88]; P = 0.0022). PFS was longer in both groups receiving nivolumab vs placebo (Tmab+, 1.6 [1.5–4.0] vs 1.5 [1.3–2.9] months, 0.49 [0.29–0.85]; P = 0.0111; Tmab−, 1.6 [1.5–2.4] vs 1.5 [1.5–1.5] months, 0.64 [0.51–0.80]; P = 0.0001). Conclusions: Nivolumab was efficacious and safe as third- or later-line therapy regardless of prior trastuzumab use in patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer.
AB - Background: Data on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer are lacking. Because HER2 status was not captured in the ATTRACTION-2 trial, we used patients with prior trastuzumab use (Tmab+) as surrogate for HER2 expression status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as third- or later-line therapy in these patients. Methods: In ATTRACTION-2, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 multicenter trial, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks until disease progression or toxicity requiring study discontinuation. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were assessed. Results: Of 493 enrolled patients, 81 (nivolumab, n = 59; placebo, n = 22) were Tmab+ and 412 (nivolumab, n = 271; placebo, n = 141) were Tmab−. In both groups, patients receiving nivolumab showed a longer median OS vs placebo (Tmab+, 8.3 [95% confidence interval, 5.3–12.9] vs 3.1 [1.9–5.3] months, hazard ratio, 0.38 [0.22–0.66]; P = 0.0006; Tmab−, 4.8 [4.1–6.0] vs 4.2 [3.6–4.9] months, 0.71 [0.57–0.88]; P = 0.0022). PFS was longer in both groups receiving nivolumab vs placebo (Tmab+, 1.6 [1.5–4.0] vs 1.5 [1.3–2.9] months, 0.49 [0.29–0.85]; P = 0.0111; Tmab−, 1.6 [1.5–2.4] vs 1.5 [1.5–1.5] months, 0.64 [0.51–0.80]; P = 0.0001). Conclusions: Nivolumab was efficacious and safe as third- or later-line therapy regardless of prior trastuzumab use in patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065787461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065787461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10120-019-00970-8
DO - 10.1007/s10120-019-00970-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 31087200
AN - SCOPUS:85065787461
SN - 1436-3291
VL - 23
SP - 143
EP - 153
JO - Gastric Cancer
JF - Gastric Cancer
IS - 1
ER -