Extended lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Lymph node yield and distribution of metastases

Kwang Hyun Kim, Sey Kiat Lim, Kyo Chul Koo, Woong Kyu Han, Sung Joon Hong, Koon Ho Rha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we reported our experience performing robotic extended lymph node dissection (eLND) in patients with prostate cancer. A total of 147 patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer who underwent robotic eLND from May 2008 to December 2011 were included in this analysis. The dissection template extended to the ureter crossing the iliac vessels. We assessed lymph node yield, lymph node positivity, and perioperative outcomes. Lymph node positivity was also evaluated according to the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed (<22 vs ≥22). The median number of LNs removed was 22 (11-51), and 97 positive LNs were found in 24 patients (16.3%). While the obturator fossa was the most common site for LN metastases (42.3%, 41/97), the internal iliac area was the most common area for a single positive LN packet (20.8%, 5/24). Eight patients (33.3%, 8/24) had positive LNs at the common iliac area. The incidence of positive LNs did not differ according to the number of LNs removed. Complications associated with eLND occurred in 21 patients (14.3%) and symptomatic lymphocele was found in five patients (3.4%). In conclusion, robotic eLND can be performed with minimal morbidity. Furthermore, LN yield and the node positive rate achieved using this robotic technique are comparable to those of open series. In addition, the extent of dissection is more important than the absolute number of LNs removed in eLND, and the robotic technique is not a prohibitive factor for performing eLND.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)824-828
Number of pages5
JournalAsian Journal of Andrology
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Robotics
Dissection
Prostatic Neoplasms
Lymphocele
Ureter

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{dcf7f02880ef434ba9ba0b5423d185ff,
title = "Extended lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Lymph node yield and distribution of metastases",
abstract = "In this study, we reported our experience performing robotic extended lymph node dissection (eLND) in patients with prostate cancer. A total of 147 patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer who underwent robotic eLND from May 2008 to December 2011 were included in this analysis. The dissection template extended to the ureter crossing the iliac vessels. We assessed lymph node yield, lymph node positivity, and perioperative outcomes. Lymph node positivity was also evaluated according to the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed (<22 vs ≥22). The median number of LNs removed was 22 (11-51), and 97 positive LNs were found in 24 patients (16.3{\%}). While the obturator fossa was the most common site for LN metastases (42.3{\%}, 41/97), the internal iliac area was the most common area for a single positive LN packet (20.8{\%}, 5/24). Eight patients (33.3{\%}, 8/24) had positive LNs at the common iliac area. The incidence of positive LNs did not differ according to the number of LNs removed. Complications associated with eLND occurred in 21 patients (14.3{\%}) and symptomatic lymphocele was found in five patients (3.4{\%}). In conclusion, robotic eLND can be performed with minimal morbidity. Furthermore, LN yield and the node positive rate achieved using this robotic technique are comparable to those of open series. In addition, the extent of dissection is more important than the absolute number of LNs removed in eLND, and the robotic technique is not a prohibitive factor for performing eLND.",
author = "Kim, {Kwang Hyun} and Lim, {Sey Kiat} and Koo, {Kyo Chul} and Han, {Woong Kyu} and Hong, {Sung Joon} and Rha, {Koon Ho}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1008-682X.133319",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "824--828",
journal = "Asian Journal of Andrology",
issn = "1008-682X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

Extended lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy : Lymph node yield and distribution of metastases. / Kim, Kwang Hyun; Lim, Sey Kiat; Koo, Kyo Chul; Han, Woong Kyu; Hong, Sung Joon; Rha, Koon Ho.

In: Asian Journal of Andrology, Vol. 16, No. 6, 01.11.2014, p. 824-828.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extended lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

T2 - Lymph node yield and distribution of metastases

AU - Kim, Kwang Hyun

AU - Lim, Sey Kiat

AU - Koo, Kyo Chul

AU - Han, Woong Kyu

AU - Hong, Sung Joon

AU - Rha, Koon Ho

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - In this study, we reported our experience performing robotic extended lymph node dissection (eLND) in patients with prostate cancer. A total of 147 patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer who underwent robotic eLND from May 2008 to December 2011 were included in this analysis. The dissection template extended to the ureter crossing the iliac vessels. We assessed lymph node yield, lymph node positivity, and perioperative outcomes. Lymph node positivity was also evaluated according to the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed (<22 vs ≥22). The median number of LNs removed was 22 (11-51), and 97 positive LNs were found in 24 patients (16.3%). While the obturator fossa was the most common site for LN metastases (42.3%, 41/97), the internal iliac area was the most common area for a single positive LN packet (20.8%, 5/24). Eight patients (33.3%, 8/24) had positive LNs at the common iliac area. The incidence of positive LNs did not differ according to the number of LNs removed. Complications associated with eLND occurred in 21 patients (14.3%) and symptomatic lymphocele was found in five patients (3.4%). In conclusion, robotic eLND can be performed with minimal morbidity. Furthermore, LN yield and the node positive rate achieved using this robotic technique are comparable to those of open series. In addition, the extent of dissection is more important than the absolute number of LNs removed in eLND, and the robotic technique is not a prohibitive factor for performing eLND.

AB - In this study, we reported our experience performing robotic extended lymph node dissection (eLND) in patients with prostate cancer. A total of 147 patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer who underwent robotic eLND from May 2008 to December 2011 were included in this analysis. The dissection template extended to the ureter crossing the iliac vessels. We assessed lymph node yield, lymph node positivity, and perioperative outcomes. Lymph node positivity was also evaluated according to the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed (<22 vs ≥22). The median number of LNs removed was 22 (11-51), and 97 positive LNs were found in 24 patients (16.3%). While the obturator fossa was the most common site for LN metastases (42.3%, 41/97), the internal iliac area was the most common area for a single positive LN packet (20.8%, 5/24). Eight patients (33.3%, 8/24) had positive LNs at the common iliac area. The incidence of positive LNs did not differ according to the number of LNs removed. Complications associated with eLND occurred in 21 patients (14.3%) and symptomatic lymphocele was found in five patients (3.4%). In conclusion, robotic eLND can be performed with minimal morbidity. Furthermore, LN yield and the node positive rate achieved using this robotic technique are comparable to those of open series. In addition, the extent of dissection is more important than the absolute number of LNs removed in eLND, and the robotic technique is not a prohibitive factor for performing eLND.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908491141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908491141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1008-682X.133319

DO - 10.4103/1008-682X.133319

M3 - Article

C2 - 25038184

AN - SCOPUS:84908491141

VL - 16

SP - 824

EP - 828

JO - Asian Journal of Andrology

JF - Asian Journal of Andrology

SN - 1008-682X

IS - 6

ER -