TY - GEN
T1 - Face verification using sparse representations
AU - Guo, Huimin
AU - Wang, Ruiping
AU - Choi, Jonghyun
AU - Davis, Larry S.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - We propose a face verification framework using sparse representations that integrates two ways of employing sparsity. Given an image pair (A, B) and a dictionary D, for image A(B), we generate two sparse codes, one by using the original dictionary and the other by adding B(A) into D as an augmented dictionary. Then the correlation of the sparse codes of A and B, both under the original dictionary D, measuring how similar the pair is, is referred to as the similarity score. The dissimilarity of the sparse codes of A(B), respectively under D and D+B(A), is referred to as the dissimilarity score. We exploit multiple feature transforms to obtain several scores using these two measures and fuse them by simple averaging for the situation where no training set is available or by an SVM when a training set is given. We evaluate our algorithm on the LFW dataset, where it is shown to outperform state-of-the-art methods in the unsupervised setting by a large margin and delivers very comparable performance to methods in the image restricted setting despite its simplicity.
AB - We propose a face verification framework using sparse representations that integrates two ways of employing sparsity. Given an image pair (A, B) and a dictionary D, for image A(B), we generate two sparse codes, one by using the original dictionary and the other by adding B(A) into D as an augmented dictionary. Then the correlation of the sparse codes of A and B, both under the original dictionary D, measuring how similar the pair is, is referred to as the similarity score. The dissimilarity of the sparse codes of A(B), respectively under D and D+B(A), is referred to as the dissimilarity score. We exploit multiple feature transforms to obtain several scores using these two measures and fuse them by simple averaging for the situation where no training set is available or by an SVM when a training set is given. We evaluate our algorithm on the LFW dataset, where it is shown to outperform state-of-the-art methods in the unsupervised setting by a large margin and delivers very comparable performance to methods in the image restricted setting despite its simplicity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864999944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864999944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CVPRW.2012.6239213
DO - 10.1109/CVPRW.2012.6239213
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84864999944
SN - 9781467316118
T3 - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops
SP - 37
EP - 44
BT - 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPRW 2012
T2 - 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPRW 2012
Y2 - 16 June 2012 through 21 June 2012
ER -