Factorization method and its physical justification in frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography

Bastian Harrach, Jin Keun Seo, Eung Je Woo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Time-difference electrical impedance tomography (tdEIT) requires two data sets measured at two different times. The difference between them is utilized to produce images of time-dependent changes in a complex conductivity distribution inside the human body. Frequency-difference EIT (fdEIT) was proposed to image frequency-dependent changes of a complex conductivity distribution. It has potential applications in tumor and stroke imaging since it can visualize an anomaly without requiring any time-reference data obtained in the absence of an anomaly. In this paper, we provide a rigorous analysis for the detectability of an anomaly based on a constructive and quantitative physical correlation between a measured fdEIT data set and an anomaly. From this, we propose a new noniterative frequency-difference anomaly detection method called the factorization method (FM) and elaborate its physical justification. To demonstrate its practical applicability, we performed fdEIT phantom imaging experiments using a multifrequency EIT system. Applying the FM to measured frequency-difference boundary voltage data sets, we could quantitatively evaluate indicator functions inside the imaging domain, of which values at each position reveal presence or absence of an anomaly. We found that the FM successfully localizes anomalies inside an imaging domain with a frequency-dependent complex conductivity distribution. We propose the new FM as an anomaly detection algorithm in fdEIT for potential applications in tumor and stroke imaging.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5491179
Pages (from-to)1918-1926
Number of pages9
JournalIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Acoustic impedance
Electric Impedance
Factorization
Tomography
Imaging techniques
Tumors
Imaging Phantoms
Stroke
Human Body
Neoplasms
Electric potential
Datasets
Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{2529d8156c514761840ce1720f6080cc,
title = "Factorization method and its physical justification in frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography",
abstract = "Time-difference electrical impedance tomography (tdEIT) requires two data sets measured at two different times. The difference between them is utilized to produce images of time-dependent changes in a complex conductivity distribution inside the human body. Frequency-difference EIT (fdEIT) was proposed to image frequency-dependent changes of a complex conductivity distribution. It has potential applications in tumor and stroke imaging since it can visualize an anomaly without requiring any time-reference data obtained in the absence of an anomaly. In this paper, we provide a rigorous analysis for the detectability of an anomaly based on a constructive and quantitative physical correlation between a measured fdEIT data set and an anomaly. From this, we propose a new noniterative frequency-difference anomaly detection method called the factorization method (FM) and elaborate its physical justification. To demonstrate its practical applicability, we performed fdEIT phantom imaging experiments using a multifrequency EIT system. Applying the FM to measured frequency-difference boundary voltage data sets, we could quantitatively evaluate indicator functions inside the imaging domain, of which values at each position reveal presence or absence of an anomaly. We found that the FM successfully localizes anomalies inside an imaging domain with a frequency-dependent complex conductivity distribution. We propose the new FM as an anomaly detection algorithm in fdEIT for potential applications in tumor and stroke imaging.",
author = "Bastian Harrach and Seo, {Jin Keun} and Woo, {Eung Je}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TMI.2010.2053553",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1918--1926",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging",
issn = "0278-0062",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "11",

}

Factorization method and its physical justification in frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography. / Harrach, Bastian; Seo, Jin Keun; Woo, Eung Je.

In: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 29, No. 11, 5491179, 01.11.2010, p. 1918-1926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factorization method and its physical justification in frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography

AU - Harrach, Bastian

AU - Seo, Jin Keun

AU - Woo, Eung Je

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Time-difference electrical impedance tomography (tdEIT) requires two data sets measured at two different times. The difference between them is utilized to produce images of time-dependent changes in a complex conductivity distribution inside the human body. Frequency-difference EIT (fdEIT) was proposed to image frequency-dependent changes of a complex conductivity distribution. It has potential applications in tumor and stroke imaging since it can visualize an anomaly without requiring any time-reference data obtained in the absence of an anomaly. In this paper, we provide a rigorous analysis for the detectability of an anomaly based on a constructive and quantitative physical correlation between a measured fdEIT data set and an anomaly. From this, we propose a new noniterative frequency-difference anomaly detection method called the factorization method (FM) and elaborate its physical justification. To demonstrate its practical applicability, we performed fdEIT phantom imaging experiments using a multifrequency EIT system. Applying the FM to measured frequency-difference boundary voltage data sets, we could quantitatively evaluate indicator functions inside the imaging domain, of which values at each position reveal presence or absence of an anomaly. We found that the FM successfully localizes anomalies inside an imaging domain with a frequency-dependent complex conductivity distribution. We propose the new FM as an anomaly detection algorithm in fdEIT for potential applications in tumor and stroke imaging.

AB - Time-difference electrical impedance tomography (tdEIT) requires two data sets measured at two different times. The difference between them is utilized to produce images of time-dependent changes in a complex conductivity distribution inside the human body. Frequency-difference EIT (fdEIT) was proposed to image frequency-dependent changes of a complex conductivity distribution. It has potential applications in tumor and stroke imaging since it can visualize an anomaly without requiring any time-reference data obtained in the absence of an anomaly. In this paper, we provide a rigorous analysis for the detectability of an anomaly based on a constructive and quantitative physical correlation between a measured fdEIT data set and an anomaly. From this, we propose a new noniterative frequency-difference anomaly detection method called the factorization method (FM) and elaborate its physical justification. To demonstrate its practical applicability, we performed fdEIT phantom imaging experiments using a multifrequency EIT system. Applying the FM to measured frequency-difference boundary voltage data sets, we could quantitatively evaluate indicator functions inside the imaging domain, of which values at each position reveal presence or absence of an anomaly. We found that the FM successfully localizes anomalies inside an imaging domain with a frequency-dependent complex conductivity distribution. We propose the new FM as an anomaly detection algorithm in fdEIT for potential applications in tumor and stroke imaging.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149265557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149265557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TMI.2010.2053553

DO - 10.1109/TMI.2010.2053553

M3 - Article

C2 - 20570764

AN - SCOPUS:78149265557

VL - 29

SP - 1918

EP - 1926

JO - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

JF - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

SN - 0278-0062

IS - 11

M1 - 5491179

ER -