Fidelity in After-School Program Intervention Research

A Systematic Review

Brandy R. Maynard, Kristen E. Peters, Michael George Vaughn, Christine M. Sarteschi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined whether and to what extent researchers addressed intervention fidelity in research of afterschool programs serving at-risk students. Method: Systematic review procedures were used to search, retrieve, select, and analyze studies for this review. Fifty-five intervention studies were assessed on the following components of intervention fidelity: strategies to enhance fidelity, measurement of fidelity, and use of fidelity data in data analysis and interpretation. Results: Of the 55 studies examined, only 55% reported well-defined intervention procedures, 42% used an intervention manual, 33% provided training on the intervention, 24% provided supervision for the implementers, 29% measured fidelity, only 4% used fidelity data in their analysis, and no studies reported the reliability of fidelity measures. Conclusion: Findings indicate an overall lack of attention to and reporting of intervention fidelity in after-school intervention studies. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613-623
Number of pages11
JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Research
Research Personnel
Students
intervention strategy
supervision
data analysis
interpretation
lack
school
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Maynard, Brandy R. ; Peters, Kristen E. ; Vaughn, Michael George ; Sarteschi, Christine M. / Fidelity in After-School Program Intervention Research : A Systematic Review. In: Research on Social Work Practice. 2013 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 613-623.
@article{b7c224ecbce74642a8d911a946625fa9,
title = "Fidelity in After-School Program Intervention Research: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Objective: This study examined whether and to what extent researchers addressed intervention fidelity in research of afterschool programs serving at-risk students. Method: Systematic review procedures were used to search, retrieve, select, and analyze studies for this review. Fifty-five intervention studies were assessed on the following components of intervention fidelity: strategies to enhance fidelity, measurement of fidelity, and use of fidelity data in data analysis and interpretation. Results: Of the 55 studies examined, only 55{\%} reported well-defined intervention procedures, 42{\%} used an intervention manual, 33{\%} provided training on the intervention, 24{\%} provided supervision for the implementers, 29{\%} measured fidelity, only 4{\%} used fidelity data in their analysis, and no studies reported the reliability of fidelity measures. Conclusion: Findings indicate an overall lack of attention to and reporting of intervention fidelity in after-school intervention studies. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed.",
author = "Maynard, {Brandy R.} and Peters, {Kristen E.} and Vaughn, {Michael George} and Sarteschi, {Christine M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049731513491150",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "613--623",
journal = "Research on Social Work Practice",
issn = "1049-7315",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Fidelity in After-School Program Intervention Research : A Systematic Review. / Maynard, Brandy R.; Peters, Kristen E.; Vaughn, Michael George; Sarteschi, Christine M.

In: Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 23, No. 6, 01.11.2013, p. 613-623.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fidelity in After-School Program Intervention Research

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Maynard, Brandy R.

AU - Peters, Kristen E.

AU - Vaughn, Michael George

AU - Sarteschi, Christine M.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Objective: This study examined whether and to what extent researchers addressed intervention fidelity in research of afterschool programs serving at-risk students. Method: Systematic review procedures were used to search, retrieve, select, and analyze studies for this review. Fifty-five intervention studies were assessed on the following components of intervention fidelity: strategies to enhance fidelity, measurement of fidelity, and use of fidelity data in data analysis and interpretation. Results: Of the 55 studies examined, only 55% reported well-defined intervention procedures, 42% used an intervention manual, 33% provided training on the intervention, 24% provided supervision for the implementers, 29% measured fidelity, only 4% used fidelity data in their analysis, and no studies reported the reliability of fidelity measures. Conclusion: Findings indicate an overall lack of attention to and reporting of intervention fidelity in after-school intervention studies. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed.

AB - Objective: This study examined whether and to what extent researchers addressed intervention fidelity in research of afterschool programs serving at-risk students. Method: Systematic review procedures were used to search, retrieve, select, and analyze studies for this review. Fifty-five intervention studies were assessed on the following components of intervention fidelity: strategies to enhance fidelity, measurement of fidelity, and use of fidelity data in data analysis and interpretation. Results: Of the 55 studies examined, only 55% reported well-defined intervention procedures, 42% used an intervention manual, 33% provided training on the intervention, 24% provided supervision for the implementers, 29% measured fidelity, only 4% used fidelity data in their analysis, and no studies reported the reliability of fidelity measures. Conclusion: Findings indicate an overall lack of attention to and reporting of intervention fidelity in after-school intervention studies. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885363328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885363328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049731513491150

DO - 10.1177/1049731513491150

M3 - Review article

VL - 23

SP - 613

EP - 623

JO - Research on Social Work Practice

JF - Research on Social Work Practice

SN - 1049-7315

IS - 6

ER -