Filiality, compassion, and Confucian democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ren, the Confucian virtue par excellence, is often explained on two different accounts: on the one hand, filiality, a uniquely Confucian social-relational virtue; on the other hand, commiseration innate in human nature. Accordingly there are two competing positions in interpreting ren: one that is utterly positive about the realization of universal love by the graduated extension of filial love, and the other that sees the inevitable tension between the particularism of filial love and the universalism of compassionate love and champions the latter in that filial love appears to create a serious obstacle to modernizing Confucianism. Nevertheless, both interpretations agree that compassion, given its universal and humanist implications, can be unquestionably conducive to the modern project of 'Confucian democracy'. This paper counters this shared view by arguing that in order to make Confucian democracy culturally meaningful and politically viable, it must accommodate uniquely Confucian relational virtues, particularly filiality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-298
Number of pages20
JournalAsian Philosophy
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Confucian
Democracy
Compassion
Ren
Universal Love
Humanist
Human Nature
Particularism
Universalism
Confucianism

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{2d0b4794f2e145688375a377ea34cf6e,
title = "Filiality, compassion, and Confucian democracy",
abstract = "Ren, the Confucian virtue par excellence, is often explained on two different accounts: on the one hand, filiality, a uniquely Confucian social-relational virtue; on the other hand, commiseration innate in human nature. Accordingly there are two competing positions in interpreting ren: one that is utterly positive about the realization of universal love by the graduated extension of filial love, and the other that sees the inevitable tension between the particularism of filial love and the universalism of compassionate love and champions the latter in that filial love appears to create a serious obstacle to modernizing Confucianism. Nevertheless, both interpretations agree that compassion, given its universal and humanist implications, can be unquestionably conducive to the modern project of 'Confucian democracy'. This paper counters this shared view by arguing that in order to make Confucian democracy culturally meaningful and politically viable, it must accommodate uniquely Confucian relational virtues, particularly filiality.",
author = "Sungmoon Kim",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09552360802440041",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "279--298",
journal = "Asian Philosophy",
issn = "0955-2367",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Filiality, compassion, and Confucian democracy. / Kim, Sungmoon.

In: Asian Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.12.2008, p. 279-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Filiality, compassion, and Confucian democracy

AU - Kim, Sungmoon

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Ren, the Confucian virtue par excellence, is often explained on two different accounts: on the one hand, filiality, a uniquely Confucian social-relational virtue; on the other hand, commiseration innate in human nature. Accordingly there are two competing positions in interpreting ren: one that is utterly positive about the realization of universal love by the graduated extension of filial love, and the other that sees the inevitable tension between the particularism of filial love and the universalism of compassionate love and champions the latter in that filial love appears to create a serious obstacle to modernizing Confucianism. Nevertheless, both interpretations agree that compassion, given its universal and humanist implications, can be unquestionably conducive to the modern project of 'Confucian democracy'. This paper counters this shared view by arguing that in order to make Confucian democracy culturally meaningful and politically viable, it must accommodate uniquely Confucian relational virtues, particularly filiality.

AB - Ren, the Confucian virtue par excellence, is often explained on two different accounts: on the one hand, filiality, a uniquely Confucian social-relational virtue; on the other hand, commiseration innate in human nature. Accordingly there are two competing positions in interpreting ren: one that is utterly positive about the realization of universal love by the graduated extension of filial love, and the other that sees the inevitable tension between the particularism of filial love and the universalism of compassionate love and champions the latter in that filial love appears to create a serious obstacle to modernizing Confucianism. Nevertheless, both interpretations agree that compassion, given its universal and humanist implications, can be unquestionably conducive to the modern project of 'Confucian democracy'. This paper counters this shared view by arguing that in order to make Confucian democracy culturally meaningful and politically viable, it must accommodate uniquely Confucian relational virtues, particularly filiality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61249174845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61249174845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09552360802440041

DO - 10.1080/09552360802440041

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61249174845

VL - 18

SP - 279

EP - 298

JO - Asian Philosophy

JF - Asian Philosophy

SN - 0955-2367

IS - 3

ER -