Financial regulatory reform in South Korea then and now

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

International best practices for financial regulation emphasize the significance of regulatory independence for prudential regulation and effective coordination for resolution of problems in financial system. These two, though not mutually exclusive, have been at odds with each other in the Korean context where coordination takes place not among equals but with top executives having the clear upper hand. This paper takes a closer look at South Korea's financial regulatory reforms since the 1997 crisis and argues that South Korea's financial regulation had oscillated between these two goals and the balance between regulatory independence and effective coordination had been tipped in the favor of the latter. The analysis shows that despite the initial pledge to regulatory independence and departure from the past practices, regulatory independence has been frequently compromised, leading to a reversal to old practices: strong political and bureaucratic influence on financial regulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)701-734
Number of pages34
JournalKorea Observer
Volume40
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Dec 1

Fingerprint

South Korea
regulation
reform
financial system
best practice

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{67de754984494f76952dd94a64067b05,
title = "Financial regulatory reform in South Korea then and now",
abstract = "International best practices for financial regulation emphasize the significance of regulatory independence for prudential regulation and effective coordination for resolution of problems in financial system. These two, though not mutually exclusive, have been at odds with each other in the Korean context where coordination takes place not among equals but with top executives having the clear upper hand. This paper takes a closer look at South Korea's financial regulatory reforms since the 1997 crisis and argues that South Korea's financial regulation had oscillated between these two goals and the balance between regulatory independence and effective coordination had been tipped in the favor of the latter. The analysis shows that despite the initial pledge to regulatory independence and departure from the past practices, regulatory independence has been frequently compromised, leading to a reversal to old practices: strong political and bureaucratic influence on financial regulation.",
author = "Jung, {Heon Joo}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "701--734",
journal = "Korea Observer",
issn = "0023-3919",
publisher = "Institute of Korean Studies",
number = "4",

}

Financial regulatory reform in South Korea then and now. / Jung, Heon Joo.

In: Korea Observer, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.12.2009, p. 701-734.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Financial regulatory reform in South Korea then and now

AU - Jung, Heon Joo

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - International best practices for financial regulation emphasize the significance of regulatory independence for prudential regulation and effective coordination for resolution of problems in financial system. These two, though not mutually exclusive, have been at odds with each other in the Korean context where coordination takes place not among equals but with top executives having the clear upper hand. This paper takes a closer look at South Korea's financial regulatory reforms since the 1997 crisis and argues that South Korea's financial regulation had oscillated between these two goals and the balance between regulatory independence and effective coordination had been tipped in the favor of the latter. The analysis shows that despite the initial pledge to regulatory independence and departure from the past practices, regulatory independence has been frequently compromised, leading to a reversal to old practices: strong political and bureaucratic influence on financial regulation.

AB - International best practices for financial regulation emphasize the significance of regulatory independence for prudential regulation and effective coordination for resolution of problems in financial system. These two, though not mutually exclusive, have been at odds with each other in the Korean context where coordination takes place not among equals but with top executives having the clear upper hand. This paper takes a closer look at South Korea's financial regulatory reforms since the 1997 crisis and argues that South Korea's financial regulation had oscillated between these two goals and the balance between regulatory independence and effective coordination had been tipped in the favor of the latter. The analysis shows that despite the initial pledge to regulatory independence and departure from the past practices, regulatory independence has been frequently compromised, leading to a reversal to old practices: strong political and bureaucratic influence on financial regulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649176615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649176615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 701

EP - 734

JO - Korea Observer

JF - Korea Observer

SN - 0023-3919

IS - 4

ER -