Focusing the mediating role of institutional trust

How does interpersonal trust promote organizational commitment?

Young Min Baek, Chan Su Jung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous organization scholars point out that trust is crucial for well-functioning organizations. However, trust in organizational settings could differ according to the objects of trust. This study compares two conceptually different models: main-effect model and mediation-effect model. The main-effect model assumes that both interpersonal trust and institutional trust promote organizational commitment independently, but the mediation-effect model assumes that institutional trust is cultivated by interpersonal trust and increases organizational commitment. The results of structural equation modeling (SEM) show that the mediation-effect model fits better than the main-effect model and that the structural coefficients of the mediation-effect model are neatly interpreted by social scientific studies of trust. This study's findings have two important implications: First, there seems to be sequential order between different types of trust in organizational settings. Second, interpersonal trust promotes organizational commitment only if it facilitates institutional trust, providing an explanation for the inconsistent findings of previous studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)481-489
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science Journal
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Dec 1

Fingerprint

commitment
mediation
Structural Models
organization

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{cd08af20a9794d36bb850cfe536e9a02,
title = "Focusing the mediating role of institutional trust: How does interpersonal trust promote organizational commitment?",
abstract = "Numerous organization scholars point out that trust is crucial for well-functioning organizations. However, trust in organizational settings could differ according to the objects of trust. This study compares two conceptually different models: main-effect model and mediation-effect model. The main-effect model assumes that both interpersonal trust and institutional trust promote organizational commitment independently, but the mediation-effect model assumes that institutional trust is cultivated by interpersonal trust and increases organizational commitment. The results of structural equation modeling (SEM) show that the mediation-effect model fits better than the main-effect model and that the structural coefficients of the mediation-effect model are neatly interpreted by social scientific studies of trust. This study's findings have two important implications: First, there seems to be sequential order between different types of trust in organizational settings. Second, interpersonal trust promotes organizational commitment only if it facilitates institutional trust, providing an explanation for the inconsistent findings of previous studies.",
author = "Baek, {Young Min} and Jung, {Chan Su}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.soscij.2014.10.005",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "481--489",
journal = "Social Science Journal",
issn = "0362-3319",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Focusing the mediating role of institutional trust : How does interpersonal trust promote organizational commitment? / Baek, Young Min; Jung, Chan Su.

In: Social Science Journal, Vol. 52, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 481-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Focusing the mediating role of institutional trust

T2 - How does interpersonal trust promote organizational commitment?

AU - Baek, Young Min

AU - Jung, Chan Su

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Numerous organization scholars point out that trust is crucial for well-functioning organizations. However, trust in organizational settings could differ according to the objects of trust. This study compares two conceptually different models: main-effect model and mediation-effect model. The main-effect model assumes that both interpersonal trust and institutional trust promote organizational commitment independently, but the mediation-effect model assumes that institutional trust is cultivated by interpersonal trust and increases organizational commitment. The results of structural equation modeling (SEM) show that the mediation-effect model fits better than the main-effect model and that the structural coefficients of the mediation-effect model are neatly interpreted by social scientific studies of trust. This study's findings have two important implications: First, there seems to be sequential order between different types of trust in organizational settings. Second, interpersonal trust promotes organizational commitment only if it facilitates institutional trust, providing an explanation for the inconsistent findings of previous studies.

AB - Numerous organization scholars point out that trust is crucial for well-functioning organizations. However, trust in organizational settings could differ according to the objects of trust. This study compares two conceptually different models: main-effect model and mediation-effect model. The main-effect model assumes that both interpersonal trust and institutional trust promote organizational commitment independently, but the mediation-effect model assumes that institutional trust is cultivated by interpersonal trust and increases organizational commitment. The results of structural equation modeling (SEM) show that the mediation-effect model fits better than the main-effect model and that the structural coefficients of the mediation-effect model are neatly interpreted by social scientific studies of trust. This study's findings have two important implications: First, there seems to be sequential order between different types of trust in organizational settings. Second, interpersonal trust promotes organizational commitment only if it facilitates institutional trust, providing an explanation for the inconsistent findings of previous studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951797838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951797838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soscij.2014.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.soscij.2014.10.005

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 481

EP - 489

JO - Social Science Journal

JF - Social Science Journal

SN - 0362-3319

IS - 4

ER -