Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: the Charter Scaligero Consensus Conference

Gian Luca Baiocchi; Domenico D’Ugo; Daniel Coit; Richard Hardwick; Paulo Kassab; Atsushi Nashimoto; Daniele Marrelli; William Allum; Alfredo Berruti; Servarayan Murugesan Chandramohan; Natalie Coburn; Santiago Gonzàlez-Moreno; Arnulf Hoelscher; Edwin Jansen; Marcis Leja; Christophe Mariette; Hans Joachim Meyer; Stefan Mönig; Paolo Morgagni; Katia Ott; Shaun Preston; Sun Young Rha; Franco Roviello; Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako; Hideaki Shimada; Cristoph Schuhmacher; Jimmy So Bok-yan; Vivian Strong; Takaki Yoshikawa; Masanori Terashima; Michail Ter-Ovanesov; Cornelis Van der Velde; Maurizio Memo; Francesco Castelli; Sergio Pecorelli; Claudio Detogni; Yasuhiro Kodera; Giovanni de Manzoni

doi:10.1007/s10120-015-0513-0

Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: the Charter Scaligero Consensus Conference

Gian Luca Baiocchi, Domenico D’Ugo, Daniel Coit, Richard Hardwick, Paulo Kassab, Atsushi Nashimoto, Daniele Marrelli, William Allum, Alfredo Berruti, Servarayan Murugesan Chandramohan, Natalie Coburn, Santiago Gonzàlez-Moreno, Arnulf Hoelscher, Edwin Jansen, Marcis Leja, Christophe Mariette, Hans Joachim Meyer, Stefan Mönig, Paolo Morgagni, Katia OttShaun Preston, Sun Young Rha, Franco Roviello, Takeshi Sano, Mitsuru Sasako, Hideaki Shimada, Cristoph Schuhmacher, Jimmy So Bok-yan, Vivian Strong, Takaki Yoshikawa, Masanori Terashima, Michail Ter-Ovanesov, Cornelis Van der Velde, Maurizio Memo, Francesco Castelli, Sergio Pecorelli, Claudio Detogni, Yasuhiro Kodera, Giovanni de Manzoni

Department of Internal Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Presently, there is no scientific evidence supporting a definite role for follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer, and clinical practices are quite different around the globe. The aim of this consensus conference was to present an ideal prototype of follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer, based on shared experiences and taking into account the need to rationalize the diagnostic course without losing the possibility of detecting local recurrence at a potentially curable stage. Methods: On June 19–22, 2013 in Verona (Italy), during the 10th International Gastric Cancer Congress (IGCC) of the International Gastric Cancer Association, a consensus meeting was held, concluding a 6-month, Web-based, consensus conference entitled “Rationale of oncological follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer.” Results: Forty-eight experts, with a geographical distribution reflecting different health cultures worldwide, participated in the consensus conference, and 39 attended the consensus meeting. Six statements were finally approved, displayed in a plenary session and signed by the vast majority of the 10th IGCC participants. These statements are attached as an annex to the Charter Scaligero on Gastric Cancer. Conclusion: After gastrectomy for cancer, oncological follow-up should be offered to patients; it should be tailored to the stage of the disease, mainly based on cross-sectional imaging, and should be discontinued after 5 years.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	15-20
Number of pages	6
Journal	Gastric Cancer
Volume	19
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0513-0
Publication status	Published - 2016 Jan 1

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Oncology
Gastroenterology
Cancer Research

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s10120-015-0513-0

Cite this

Baiocchi, G. L., D’Ugo, D., Coit, D., Hardwick, R., Kassab, P., Nashimoto, A., Marrelli, D., Allum, W., Berruti, A., Chandramohan, S. M., Coburn, N., Gonzàlez-Moreno, S., Hoelscher, A., Jansen, E., Leja, M., Mariette, C., Meyer, H. J., Mönig, S., Morgagni, P., ... de Manzoni, G. (2016). Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: the Charter Scaligero Consensus Conference. Gastric Cancer, 19(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0513-0

@article{821cd4dc44074b1eae1f9834bffcac40,

title = "Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: the Charter Scaligero Consensus Conference",

abstract = "Purpose: Presently, there is no scientific evidence supporting a definite role for follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer, and clinical practices are quite different around the globe. The aim of this consensus conference was to present an ideal prototype of follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer, based on shared experiences and taking into account the need to rationalize the diagnostic course without losing the possibility of detecting local recurrence at a potentially curable stage. Methods: On June 19–22, 2013 in Verona (Italy), during the 10th International Gastric Cancer Congress (IGCC) of the International Gastric Cancer Association, a consensus meeting was held, concluding a 6-month, Web-based, consensus conference entitled “Rationale of oncological follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer.” Results: Forty-eight experts, with a geographical distribution reflecting different health cultures worldwide, participated in the consensus conference, and 39 attended the consensus meeting. Six statements were finally approved, displayed in a plenary session and signed by the vast majority of the 10th IGCC participants. These statements are attached as an annex to the Charter Scaligero on Gastric Cancer. Conclusion: After gastrectomy for cancer, oncological follow-up should be offered to patients; it should be tailored to the stage of the disease, mainly based on cross-sectional imaging, and should be discontinued after 5 years.",

author = "Baiocchi, {Gian Luca} and Domenico D{\textquoteright}Ugo and Daniel Coit and Richard Hardwick and Paulo Kassab and Atsushi Nashimoto and Daniele Marrelli and William Allum and Alfredo Berruti and Chandramohan, {Servarayan Murugesan} and Natalie Coburn and Santiago Gonz{\`a}lez-Moreno and Arnulf Hoelscher and Edwin Jansen and Marcis Leja and Christophe Mariette and Meyer, {Hans Joachim} and Stefan M{\"o}nig and Paolo Morgagni and Katia Ott and Shaun Preston and Rha, {Sun Young} and Franco Roviello and Takeshi Sano and Mitsuru Sasako and Hideaki Shimada and Cristoph Schuhmacher and {So Bok-yan}, Jimmy and Vivian Strong and Takaki Yoshikawa and Masanori Terashima and Michail Ter-Ovanesov and {Van der Velde}, Cornelis and Maurizio Memo and Francesco Castelli and Sergio Pecorelli and Claudio Detogni and Yasuhiro Kodera and {de Manzoni}, Giovanni",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015, The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10120-015-0513-0",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "15--20",

journal = "Gastric Cancer",

issn = "1436-3291",

publisher = "Springer Japan",

number = "1",

}

Baiocchi, GL, D’Ugo, D, Coit, D, Hardwick, R, Kassab, P, Nashimoto, A, Marrelli, D, Allum, W, Berruti, A, Chandramohan, SM, Coburn, N, Gonzàlez-Moreno, S, Hoelscher, A, Jansen, E, Leja, M, Mariette, C, Meyer, HJ, Mönig, S, Morgagni, P, Ott, K, Preston, S, Rha, SY, Roviello, F, Sano, T, Sasako, M, Shimada, H, Schuhmacher, C, So Bok-yan, J, Strong, V, Yoshikawa, T, Terashima, M, Ter-Ovanesov, M, Van der Velde, C, Memo, M, Castelli, F, Pecorelli, S, Detogni, C, Kodera, Y & de Manzoni, G 2016, 'Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: the Charter Scaligero Consensus Conference', Gastric Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0513-0

TY - JOUR

T1 - Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer

T2 - the Charter Scaligero Consensus Conference

AU - Baiocchi, Gian Luca

AU - D’Ugo, Domenico

AU - Coit, Daniel

AU - Hardwick, Richard

AU - Kassab, Paulo

AU - Nashimoto, Atsushi

AU - Marrelli, Daniele

AU - Allum, William

AU - Berruti, Alfredo

AU - Chandramohan, Servarayan Murugesan

AU - Coburn, Natalie

AU - Gonzàlez-Moreno, Santiago

AU - Hoelscher, Arnulf

AU - Jansen, Edwin

AU - Leja, Marcis

AU - Mariette, Christophe

AU - Meyer, Hans Joachim

AU - Mönig, Stefan

AU - Morgagni, Paolo

AU - Ott, Katia

AU - Preston, Shaun

AU - Rha, Sun Young

AU - Roviello, Franco

AU - Sano, Takeshi

AU - Sasako, Mitsuru

AU - Shimada, Hideaki

AU - Schuhmacher, Cristoph

AU - So Bok-yan, Jimmy

AU - Strong, Vivian

AU - Yoshikawa, Takaki

AU - Terashima, Masanori

AU - Ter-Ovanesov, Michail

AU - Van der Velde, Cornelis

AU - Memo, Maurizio

AU - Castelli, Francesco

AU - Pecorelli, Sergio

AU - Detogni, Claudio

AU - Kodera, Yasuhiro

AU - de Manzoni, Giovanni

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Presently, there is no scientific evidence supporting a definite role for follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer, and clinical practices are quite different around the globe. The aim of this consensus conference was to present an ideal prototype of follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer, based on shared experiences and taking into account the need to rationalize the diagnostic course without losing the possibility of detecting local recurrence at a potentially curable stage. Methods: On June 19–22, 2013 in Verona (Italy), during the 10th International Gastric Cancer Congress (IGCC) of the International Gastric Cancer Association, a consensus meeting was held, concluding a 6-month, Web-based, consensus conference entitled “Rationale of oncological follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer.” Results: Forty-eight experts, with a geographical distribution reflecting different health cultures worldwide, participated in the consensus conference, and 39 attended the consensus meeting. Six statements were finally approved, displayed in a plenary session and signed by the vast majority of the 10th IGCC participants. These statements are attached as an annex to the Charter Scaligero on Gastric Cancer. Conclusion: After gastrectomy for cancer, oncological follow-up should be offered to patients; it should be tailored to the stage of the disease, mainly based on cross-sectional imaging, and should be discontinued after 5 years.

AB - Purpose: Presently, there is no scientific evidence supporting a definite role for follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer, and clinical practices are quite different around the globe. The aim of this consensus conference was to present an ideal prototype of follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer, based on shared experiences and taking into account the need to rationalize the diagnostic course without losing the possibility of detecting local recurrence at a potentially curable stage. Methods: On June 19–22, 2013 in Verona (Italy), during the 10th International Gastric Cancer Congress (IGCC) of the International Gastric Cancer Association, a consensus meeting was held, concluding a 6-month, Web-based, consensus conference entitled “Rationale of oncological follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer.” Results: Forty-eight experts, with a geographical distribution reflecting different health cultures worldwide, participated in the consensus conference, and 39 attended the consensus meeting. Six statements were finally approved, displayed in a plenary session and signed by the vast majority of the 10th IGCC participants. These statements are attached as an annex to the Charter Scaligero on Gastric Cancer. Conclusion: After gastrectomy for cancer, oncological follow-up should be offered to patients; it should be tailored to the stage of the disease, mainly based on cross-sectional imaging, and should be discontinued after 5 years.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951052940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951052940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10120-015-0513-0

DO - 10.1007/s10120-015-0513-0

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26140915

AN - SCOPUS:84951052940

SN - 1436-3291

VL - 19

SP - 15

EP - 20

JO - Gastric Cancer

JF - Gastric Cancer

IS - 1

ER -

Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: the Charter Scaligero Consensus Conference

Abstract

Bibliographical note

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this