Forest fire risk mapping of Kolli Hills, India, considering subjectivity and inconsistency issues

Jaehoon Jung, Changjae Kim, Shanmuganathan Jayakumar, Seongsam Kim, Soohee Han, Dong Hyun Kim, Joon Heo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forest fires have adverse ecological, economic, and social impacts. In this light, the present research aimed, first, to construct a fire risk model using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and second, to derive a forest fire risk modeling strategy that alleviates the problem of inconsistency in the assigning of scores and weights to forest fire categories and layers. Third, the local-orientation effects and causes, which are relevant to the subjectivity problem, were investigated by comparing the risk scoring and weighting outcomes from Indian and Korean expert groups (IEG and KEG). Fourth, forest fire factors that can be considered regional and global also were investigated. Kolli Hills, India, was selected as the study area in this research. In the interests of alleviating the inconsistency problem, a weighting and scoring scheme based on the analytic hierarchy process was applied. The experiences from the existence of prevailing westerly winds, the most common forest types (i. e., in Korea: pine trees), and the different anthropogenic pressures between Korea and India resulted in the different scoring and weighting decisions of the two expert groups. Among the five fire risk factors, slope, road, and settlement can be considered to be global factors. On the other hand, forest cover and aspect are regional factors that can be more influenced by local environmental conditions. When considering the producer's accuracy, the approach of the IEG together with the natural breaks thresholding method provided the best fire risk mapping result. On the other hand, the model from the IEG with equal interval provided the best result from the viewpoint of user's accuracy and overall accuracy. Overall, this paper proposes a forest fire risk mapping procedure as basis for developing a global forest fire risk modeling in the future, where a series of standardized modeling steps and variables should be defined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2129-2146
Number of pages18
JournalNatural Hazards
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

forest fire
modeling
ecological economics
social impact
ecological impact
forest cover
risk factor
economic impact
westerly
GIS
environmental conditions
road

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Jung, Jaehoon ; Kim, Changjae ; Jayakumar, Shanmuganathan ; Kim, Seongsam ; Han, Soohee ; Kim, Dong Hyun ; Heo, Joon. / Forest fire risk mapping of Kolli Hills, India, considering subjectivity and inconsistency issues. In: Natural Hazards. 2013 ; Vol. 65, No. 3. pp. 2129-2146.
@article{d6f8704b2941434a9acfd46aebb33282,
title = "Forest fire risk mapping of Kolli Hills, India, considering subjectivity and inconsistency issues",
abstract = "Forest fires have adverse ecological, economic, and social impacts. In this light, the present research aimed, first, to construct a fire risk model using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and second, to derive a forest fire risk modeling strategy that alleviates the problem of inconsistency in the assigning of scores and weights to forest fire categories and layers. Third, the local-orientation effects and causes, which are relevant to the subjectivity problem, were investigated by comparing the risk scoring and weighting outcomes from Indian and Korean expert groups (IEG and KEG). Fourth, forest fire factors that can be considered regional and global also were investigated. Kolli Hills, India, was selected as the study area in this research. In the interests of alleviating the inconsistency problem, a weighting and scoring scheme based on the analytic hierarchy process was applied. The experiences from the existence of prevailing westerly winds, the most common forest types (i. e., in Korea: pine trees), and the different anthropogenic pressures between Korea and India resulted in the different scoring and weighting decisions of the two expert groups. Among the five fire risk factors, slope, road, and settlement can be considered to be global factors. On the other hand, forest cover and aspect are regional factors that can be more influenced by local environmental conditions. When considering the producer's accuracy, the approach of the IEG together with the natural breaks thresholding method provided the best fire risk mapping result. On the other hand, the model from the IEG with equal interval provided the best result from the viewpoint of user's accuracy and overall accuracy. Overall, this paper proposes a forest fire risk mapping procedure as basis for developing a global forest fire risk modeling in the future, where a series of standardized modeling steps and variables should be defined.",
author = "Jaehoon Jung and Changjae Kim and Shanmuganathan Jayakumar and Seongsam Kim and Soohee Han and Kim, {Dong Hyun} and Joon Heo",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11069-012-0465-1",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "2129--2146",
journal = "Natural Hazards",
issn = "0921-030X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Forest fire risk mapping of Kolli Hills, India, considering subjectivity and inconsistency issues. / Jung, Jaehoon; Kim, Changjae; Jayakumar, Shanmuganathan; Kim, Seongsam; Han, Soohee; Kim, Dong Hyun; Heo, Joon.

In: Natural Hazards, Vol. 65, No. 3, 01.01.2013, p. 2129-2146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forest fire risk mapping of Kolli Hills, India, considering subjectivity and inconsistency issues

AU - Jung, Jaehoon

AU - Kim, Changjae

AU - Jayakumar, Shanmuganathan

AU - Kim, Seongsam

AU - Han, Soohee

AU - Kim, Dong Hyun

AU - Heo, Joon

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Forest fires have adverse ecological, economic, and social impacts. In this light, the present research aimed, first, to construct a fire risk model using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and second, to derive a forest fire risk modeling strategy that alleviates the problem of inconsistency in the assigning of scores and weights to forest fire categories and layers. Third, the local-orientation effects and causes, which are relevant to the subjectivity problem, were investigated by comparing the risk scoring and weighting outcomes from Indian and Korean expert groups (IEG and KEG). Fourth, forest fire factors that can be considered regional and global also were investigated. Kolli Hills, India, was selected as the study area in this research. In the interests of alleviating the inconsistency problem, a weighting and scoring scheme based on the analytic hierarchy process was applied. The experiences from the existence of prevailing westerly winds, the most common forest types (i. e., in Korea: pine trees), and the different anthropogenic pressures between Korea and India resulted in the different scoring and weighting decisions of the two expert groups. Among the five fire risk factors, slope, road, and settlement can be considered to be global factors. On the other hand, forest cover and aspect are regional factors that can be more influenced by local environmental conditions. When considering the producer's accuracy, the approach of the IEG together with the natural breaks thresholding method provided the best fire risk mapping result. On the other hand, the model from the IEG with equal interval provided the best result from the viewpoint of user's accuracy and overall accuracy. Overall, this paper proposes a forest fire risk mapping procedure as basis for developing a global forest fire risk modeling in the future, where a series of standardized modeling steps and variables should be defined.

AB - Forest fires have adverse ecological, economic, and social impacts. In this light, the present research aimed, first, to construct a fire risk model using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and second, to derive a forest fire risk modeling strategy that alleviates the problem of inconsistency in the assigning of scores and weights to forest fire categories and layers. Third, the local-orientation effects and causes, which are relevant to the subjectivity problem, were investigated by comparing the risk scoring and weighting outcomes from Indian and Korean expert groups (IEG and KEG). Fourth, forest fire factors that can be considered regional and global also were investigated. Kolli Hills, India, was selected as the study area in this research. In the interests of alleviating the inconsistency problem, a weighting and scoring scheme based on the analytic hierarchy process was applied. The experiences from the existence of prevailing westerly winds, the most common forest types (i. e., in Korea: pine trees), and the different anthropogenic pressures between Korea and India resulted in the different scoring and weighting decisions of the two expert groups. Among the five fire risk factors, slope, road, and settlement can be considered to be global factors. On the other hand, forest cover and aspect are regional factors that can be more influenced by local environmental conditions. When considering the producer's accuracy, the approach of the IEG together with the natural breaks thresholding method provided the best fire risk mapping result. On the other hand, the model from the IEG with equal interval provided the best result from the viewpoint of user's accuracy and overall accuracy. Overall, this paper proposes a forest fire risk mapping procedure as basis for developing a global forest fire risk modeling in the future, where a series of standardized modeling steps and variables should be defined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871935861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871935861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11069-012-0465-1

DO - 10.1007/s11069-012-0465-1

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 2129

EP - 2146

JO - Natural Hazards

JF - Natural Hazards

SN - 0921-030X

IS - 3

ER -