Forking in simple unstable theories

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In [9], Shelah introduced a class of first order theories, which he called simple, properly containing the class of stable theories. Here we prove for simple theories, (i) the equivalence of forking and dividing, (ii) the symmetry and transivity of forking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-267
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the London Mathematical Society
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Unstable
Equivalence
First-order
Symmetry
Class

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

@article{6bba00195ffc4a53aa74df52bc58fbd6,
title = "Forking in simple unstable theories",
abstract = "In [9], Shelah introduced a class of first order theories, which he called simple, properly containing the class of stable theories. Here we prove for simple theories, (i) the equivalence of forking and dividing, (ii) the symmetry and transivity of forking.",
author = "Byunghan Kim",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1112/S0024610798005985",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "257--267",
journal = "Journal of the London Mathematical Society",
issn = "0024-6107",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Forking in simple unstable theories. / Kim, Byunghan.

In: Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Vol. 57, No. 2, 01.01.1998, p. 257-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forking in simple unstable theories

AU - Kim, Byunghan

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - In [9], Shelah introduced a class of first order theories, which he called simple, properly containing the class of stable theories. Here we prove for simple theories, (i) the equivalence of forking and dividing, (ii) the symmetry and transivity of forking.

AB - In [9], Shelah introduced a class of first order theories, which he called simple, properly containing the class of stable theories. Here we prove for simple theories, (i) the equivalence of forking and dividing, (ii) the symmetry and transivity of forking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000860685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000860685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1112/S0024610798005985

DO - 10.1112/S0024610798005985

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000860685

VL - 57

SP - 257

EP - 267

JO - Journal of the London Mathematical Society

JF - Journal of the London Mathematical Society

SN - 0024-6107

IS - 2

ER -