Frame Contest of Foreign Policy: Who Influences Whom in South Korea?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unlike under authoritarian rule in South Korea, the autonomy of political actors has increased vastly over the years since democratization in 1987. Moreover, diversified participants of policy-making beyond political entities, including the media, interest groups, and civil society, have become an important variable to the policy-making process. From the beginning of his candidacy, President Roh Moo-hyun called for changes to the policy towards the United States, and his continuous efforts to persuade diverse actors brought about controversies throughout his term. Policies that deviated from past administrations triggered criticisms from his political opposition, while policies similar to the past administrations prompted disapproval from his supporters. This study attempts to explain how the political actors during the Roh administration framed certain issues to gain the upper hand in foreign policy. I have selected issues that drew great social attention and controversies (such as troop dispatch to Iraq and wartime operational control transition) and conducted vector autoregression analysis to empirically analyze the reciprocal relationship among the president, the National Assembly, and the media. As a result, this study was able to highlight their reciprocal relationship depending on the foreign-policy goals – national interest or national prestige – on the nature of policy prosecution, either passive or proactive, and on the urgency of policy enforcement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-174
Number of pages34
JournalPacific Focus
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Apr 1

Fingerprint

South Korea
foreign policy
political actor
president
national assembly
prosecution
prestige
interest group
Iraq
democratization
civil society
opposition
criticism
candidacy
autonomy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{7a8e58d05d334a80b9b01fda9ed3fdff,
title = "Frame Contest of Foreign Policy: Who Influences Whom in South Korea?",
abstract = "Unlike under authoritarian rule in South Korea, the autonomy of political actors has increased vastly over the years since democratization in 1987. Moreover, diversified participants of policy-making beyond political entities, including the media, interest groups, and civil society, have become an important variable to the policy-making process. From the beginning of his candidacy, President Roh Moo-hyun called for changes to the policy towards the United States, and his continuous efforts to persuade diverse actors brought about controversies throughout his term. Policies that deviated from past administrations triggered criticisms from his political opposition, while policies similar to the past administrations prompted disapproval from his supporters. This study attempts to explain how the political actors during the Roh administration framed certain issues to gain the upper hand in foreign policy. I have selected issues that drew great social attention and controversies (such as troop dispatch to Iraq and wartime operational control transition) and conducted vector autoregression analysis to empirically analyze the reciprocal relationship among the president, the National Assembly, and the media. As a result, this study was able to highlight their reciprocal relationship depending on the foreign-policy goals – national interest or national prestige – on the nature of policy prosecution, either passive or proactive, and on the urgency of policy enforcement.",
author = "Jaeyoung Hur",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pafo.12111",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "141--174",
journal = "Pacific Focus",
issn = "1225-4657",
publisher = "INHA University",
number = "1",

}

Frame Contest of Foreign Policy : Who Influences Whom in South Korea? / Hur, Jaeyoung.

In: Pacific Focus, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.04.2018, p. 141-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frame Contest of Foreign Policy

T2 - Who Influences Whom in South Korea?

AU - Hur, Jaeyoung

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Unlike under authoritarian rule in South Korea, the autonomy of political actors has increased vastly over the years since democratization in 1987. Moreover, diversified participants of policy-making beyond political entities, including the media, interest groups, and civil society, have become an important variable to the policy-making process. From the beginning of his candidacy, President Roh Moo-hyun called for changes to the policy towards the United States, and his continuous efforts to persuade diverse actors brought about controversies throughout his term. Policies that deviated from past administrations triggered criticisms from his political opposition, while policies similar to the past administrations prompted disapproval from his supporters. This study attempts to explain how the political actors during the Roh administration framed certain issues to gain the upper hand in foreign policy. I have selected issues that drew great social attention and controversies (such as troop dispatch to Iraq and wartime operational control transition) and conducted vector autoregression analysis to empirically analyze the reciprocal relationship among the president, the National Assembly, and the media. As a result, this study was able to highlight their reciprocal relationship depending on the foreign-policy goals – national interest or national prestige – on the nature of policy prosecution, either passive or proactive, and on the urgency of policy enforcement.

AB - Unlike under authoritarian rule in South Korea, the autonomy of political actors has increased vastly over the years since democratization in 1987. Moreover, diversified participants of policy-making beyond political entities, including the media, interest groups, and civil society, have become an important variable to the policy-making process. From the beginning of his candidacy, President Roh Moo-hyun called for changes to the policy towards the United States, and his continuous efforts to persuade diverse actors brought about controversies throughout his term. Policies that deviated from past administrations triggered criticisms from his political opposition, while policies similar to the past administrations prompted disapproval from his supporters. This study attempts to explain how the political actors during the Roh administration framed certain issues to gain the upper hand in foreign policy. I have selected issues that drew great social attention and controversies (such as troop dispatch to Iraq and wartime operational control transition) and conducted vector autoregression analysis to empirically analyze the reciprocal relationship among the president, the National Assembly, and the media. As a result, this study was able to highlight their reciprocal relationship depending on the foreign-policy goals – national interest or national prestige – on the nature of policy prosecution, either passive or proactive, and on the urgency of policy enforcement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045515674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045515674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pafo.12111

DO - 10.1111/pafo.12111

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045515674

VL - 33

SP - 141

EP - 174

JO - Pacific Focus

JF - Pacific Focus

SN - 1225-4657

IS - 1

ER -