From remonstrance to impeachment: A curious case of “confucian constitutionalism” in South Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In his path-breaking essay that investigates the rise of judicial review in democratic Taiwan and South Korea, Tom Ginsburg presents the distinctive style of judicial review practiced by both countries in terms of “Confucian constitutionalism,” at the core of which is the practice of constitutional review as remonstrance. This Article examines whether the model of Confucian constitutionalism is still relevant in Korea, especially in light of the Constitutional Court's recent decision to uphold the motion to impeach the president rather than merely offering remonstrance or warning. By associating the Court's jurisprudence characterized by highly moralistic language and style of reasoning with Confucian constitutionalism, this Article presents Confucian constitutionalism as indirect constitutionalism, a mode of constitutionalism that aims to shape the polity's constitutional identity in a way that achieves a meaningful congruence between liberal constitutional principles and the underlying public culture that defines the polity as a distinctive moral community.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586-616
Number of pages31
JournalLaw and Social Inquiry
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Aug 1

Fingerprint

constitutionalism
South Korea
constitutional court
court decision
jurisprudence
Korea
Taiwan
president
language
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Law

Cite this

@article{3ed598a138f740b2b77667c1f58060cc,
title = "From remonstrance to impeachment: A curious case of “confucian constitutionalism” in South Korea",
abstract = "In his path-breaking essay that investigates the rise of judicial review in democratic Taiwan and South Korea, Tom Ginsburg presents the distinctive style of judicial review practiced by both countries in terms of “Confucian constitutionalism,” at the core of which is the practice of constitutional review as remonstrance. This Article examines whether the model of Confucian constitutionalism is still relevant in Korea, especially in light of the Constitutional Court's recent decision to uphold the motion to impeach the president rather than merely offering remonstrance or warning. By associating the Court's jurisprudence characterized by highly moralistic language and style of reasoning with Confucian constitutionalism, this Article presents Confucian constitutionalism as indirect constitutionalism, a mode of constitutionalism that aims to shape the polity's constitutional identity in a way that achieves a meaningful congruence between liberal constitutional principles and the underlying public culture that defines the polity as a distinctive moral community.",
author = "Sungmoon Kim",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/lsi.2018.24",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "586--616",
journal = "Law and Social Inquiry",
issn = "0897-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

From remonstrance to impeachment : A curious case of “confucian constitutionalism” in South Korea. / Kim, Sungmoon.

In: Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.08.2019, p. 586-616.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From remonstrance to impeachment

T2 - A curious case of “confucian constitutionalism” in South Korea

AU - Kim, Sungmoon

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - In his path-breaking essay that investigates the rise of judicial review in democratic Taiwan and South Korea, Tom Ginsburg presents the distinctive style of judicial review practiced by both countries in terms of “Confucian constitutionalism,” at the core of which is the practice of constitutional review as remonstrance. This Article examines whether the model of Confucian constitutionalism is still relevant in Korea, especially in light of the Constitutional Court's recent decision to uphold the motion to impeach the president rather than merely offering remonstrance or warning. By associating the Court's jurisprudence characterized by highly moralistic language and style of reasoning with Confucian constitutionalism, this Article presents Confucian constitutionalism as indirect constitutionalism, a mode of constitutionalism that aims to shape the polity's constitutional identity in a way that achieves a meaningful congruence between liberal constitutional principles and the underlying public culture that defines the polity as a distinctive moral community.

AB - In his path-breaking essay that investigates the rise of judicial review in democratic Taiwan and South Korea, Tom Ginsburg presents the distinctive style of judicial review practiced by both countries in terms of “Confucian constitutionalism,” at the core of which is the practice of constitutional review as remonstrance. This Article examines whether the model of Confucian constitutionalism is still relevant in Korea, especially in light of the Constitutional Court's recent decision to uphold the motion to impeach the president rather than merely offering remonstrance or warning. By associating the Court's jurisprudence characterized by highly moralistic language and style of reasoning with Confucian constitutionalism, this Article presents Confucian constitutionalism as indirect constitutionalism, a mode of constitutionalism that aims to shape the polity's constitutional identity in a way that achieves a meaningful congruence between liberal constitutional principles and the underlying public culture that defines the polity as a distinctive moral community.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069502504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069502504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/lsi.2018.24

DO - 10.1017/lsi.2018.24

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069502504

VL - 44

SP - 586

EP - 616

JO - Law and Social Inquiry

JF - Law and Social Inquiry

SN - 0897-6546

IS - 3

ER -