Gender Symmetry in the Self-Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence

Ko Ling Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research has not conclusively determined whether men and women are equally likely to commit intimate partner violence (IPV). One explanation for the disparity in previous findings may be gender-based differences in reporting styles. The present study investigated whether there was any gender difference in self-reported IPV prevalence. A total of 3,740 Chinese couples from a representative population in Hong Kong were interviewed. Self-reports of men-to-women and women-to-men IPV between spouses were compared. Gender was controlled for to evaluate whether age, education, the Chinese concept of face, and other violence-related characteristics would affect the self-reporting of IPV. Findings supported gender symmetry in self-reported IPV prevalence as well as a moderate interspousal agreement in the self-reports. After adjustment for covariates, face was a significant factor predicting the interspousal differences in both men-to-women and women-to-men physical IPV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-286
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan

Fingerprint

Self Report
Hong Kong
Spouses
Violence
Intimate Partner Violence
Education
Research
Population
Physical Abuse

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{5a1256d9857b4dd398b82efb181d9632,
title = "Gender Symmetry in the Self-Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence",
abstract = "Research has not conclusively determined whether men and women are equally likely to commit intimate partner violence (IPV). One explanation for the disparity in previous findings may be gender-based differences in reporting styles. The present study investigated whether there was any gender difference in self-reported IPV prevalence. A total of 3,740 Chinese couples from a representative population in Hong Kong were interviewed. Self-reports of men-to-women and women-to-men IPV between spouses were compared. Gender was controlled for to evaluate whether age, education, the Chinese concept of face, and other violence-related characteristics would affect the self-reporting of IPV. Findings supported gender symmetry in self-reported IPV prevalence as well as a moderate interspousal agreement in the self-reports. After adjustment for covariates, face was a significant factor predicting the interspousal differences in both men-to-women and women-to-men physical IPV.",
author = "Chan, {Ko Ling}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0886260511416463",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "263--286",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Gender Symmetry in the Self-Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence. / Chan, Ko Ling.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.2012, p. 263-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender Symmetry in the Self-Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence

AU - Chan, Ko Ling

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Research has not conclusively determined whether men and women are equally likely to commit intimate partner violence (IPV). One explanation for the disparity in previous findings may be gender-based differences in reporting styles. The present study investigated whether there was any gender difference in self-reported IPV prevalence. A total of 3,740 Chinese couples from a representative population in Hong Kong were interviewed. Self-reports of men-to-women and women-to-men IPV between spouses were compared. Gender was controlled for to evaluate whether age, education, the Chinese concept of face, and other violence-related characteristics would affect the self-reporting of IPV. Findings supported gender symmetry in self-reported IPV prevalence as well as a moderate interspousal agreement in the self-reports. After adjustment for covariates, face was a significant factor predicting the interspousal differences in both men-to-women and women-to-men physical IPV.

AB - Research has not conclusively determined whether men and women are equally likely to commit intimate partner violence (IPV). One explanation for the disparity in previous findings may be gender-based differences in reporting styles. The present study investigated whether there was any gender difference in self-reported IPV prevalence. A total of 3,740 Chinese couples from a representative population in Hong Kong were interviewed. Self-reports of men-to-women and women-to-men IPV between spouses were compared. Gender was controlled for to evaluate whether age, education, the Chinese concept of face, and other violence-related characteristics would affect the self-reporting of IPV. Findings supported gender symmetry in self-reported IPV prevalence as well as a moderate interspousal agreement in the self-reports. After adjustment for covariates, face was a significant factor predicting the interspousal differences in both men-to-women and women-to-men physical IPV.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857555890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857555890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0886260511416463

DO - 10.1177/0886260511416463

M3 - Article

C2 - 21920874

AN - SCOPUS:84857555890

VL - 27

SP - 263

EP - 286

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 2

ER -