Generic and psychological patient-reported deficits in those with chronic ankle instability: A cross sectional study

Erik A. Wikstrom; Kyeongtak Song

doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.09.004

Generic and psychological patient-reported deficits in those with chronic ankle instability: A cross sectional study

Erik A. Wikstrom, Kyeongtak Song

Department of Physical Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify differences in generic and psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between those with CAI and uninjured controls. To determine associations between generic and psychological PROs, in those with CAI, to regional PROs and injury history characteristics. Design: Cross-sectional, descriptive. Setting: Sport Medicine Research Laboratory. Participants: Included 45 individuals with CAI and 45 uninjured controls. CAI was defined based on the recommendations of the International Ankle Consortium. Main outcome measures: Two regional PROs (e.g. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), and several generic and psychological PROs (e.g. SF-36, select PROMIS short forms, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). Results: Those with CAI had worse scores, relative to controls, in PROs related to regional function, generic physical function, pain, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and injury related fear. The number of giving way episodes, CAI severity, and regional PROs associated with generic physical function scales as well as a pain scale. Conclusions: Select generic physical function and psychological scales can detect differences between those with and without CAI. Specific injury history characteristics and regional PROs associate with generic and psychological PROs.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	137-142
Number of pages	6
Journal	Physical Therapy in Sport
Volume	40
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.09.004
Publication status	Published - 2019 Nov

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Our results are consistent with the existing literature and partially support our a priori hypothesis as generic and psychological scales that dealt with physical function, pain, and/or injury related fear differed between those with and without CAI while scales focused on mental health did not. Scales dealing with social considerations demonstrated mixed results. Our results also supported our a priori hypothesis as some but not all generic and psychological PROs associated with injury history characteristics and regional PROs in those with CAI.Junior Faculty Award from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.09.004

Cite this

@article{eb02bb79ca6641b396d1e250f08b5d7c,

title = "Generic and psychological patient-reported deficits in those with chronic ankle instability: A cross sectional study",

abstract = "Objectives: To quantify differences in generic and psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between those with CAI and uninjured controls. To determine associations between generic and psychological PROs, in those with CAI, to regional PROs and injury history characteristics. Design: Cross-sectional, descriptive. Setting: Sport Medicine Research Laboratory. Participants: Included 45 individuals with CAI and 45 uninjured controls. CAI was defined based on the recommendations of the International Ankle Consortium. Main outcome measures: Two regional PROs (e.g. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), and several generic and psychological PROs (e.g. SF-36, select PROMIS short forms, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). Results: Those with CAI had worse scores, relative to controls, in PROs related to regional function, generic physical function, pain, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and injury related fear. The number of giving way episodes, CAI severity, and regional PROs associated with generic physical function scales as well as a pain scale. Conclusions: Select generic physical function and psychological scales can detect differences between those with and without CAI. Specific injury history characteristics and regional PROs associate with generic and psychological PROs.",

author = "Wikstrom, {Erik A.} and Kyeongtak Song",

note = "Funding Information: Our results are consistent with the existing literature and partially support our a priori hypothesis as generic and psychological scales that dealt with physical function, pain, and/or injury related fear differed between those with and without CAI while scales focused on mental health did not. Scales dealing with social considerations demonstrated mixed results. Our results also supported our a priori hypothesis as some but not all generic and psychological PROs associated with injury history characteristics and regional PROs in those with CAI.Junior Faculty Award from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.09.004",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "137--142",

journal = "Physical Therapy in Sport",

issn = "1873-1600",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generic and psychological patient-reported deficits in those with chronic ankle instability

T2 - A cross sectional study

AU - Wikstrom, Erik A.

AU - Song, Kyeongtak

N1 - Funding Information: Our results are consistent with the existing literature and partially support our a priori hypothesis as generic and psychological scales that dealt with physical function, pain, and/or injury related fear differed between those with and without CAI while scales focused on mental health did not. Scales dealing with social considerations demonstrated mixed results. Our results also supported our a priori hypothesis as some but not all generic and psychological PROs associated with injury history characteristics and regional PROs in those with CAI.Junior Faculty Award from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Objectives: To quantify differences in generic and psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between those with CAI and uninjured controls. To determine associations between generic and psychological PROs, in those with CAI, to regional PROs and injury history characteristics. Design: Cross-sectional, descriptive. Setting: Sport Medicine Research Laboratory. Participants: Included 45 individuals with CAI and 45 uninjured controls. CAI was defined based on the recommendations of the International Ankle Consortium. Main outcome measures: Two regional PROs (e.g. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), and several generic and psychological PROs (e.g. SF-36, select PROMIS short forms, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). Results: Those with CAI had worse scores, relative to controls, in PROs related to regional function, generic physical function, pain, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and injury related fear. The number of giving way episodes, CAI severity, and regional PROs associated with generic physical function scales as well as a pain scale. Conclusions: Select generic physical function and psychological scales can detect differences between those with and without CAI. Specific injury history characteristics and regional PROs associate with generic and psychological PROs.

AB - Objectives: To quantify differences in generic and psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between those with CAI and uninjured controls. To determine associations between generic and psychological PROs, in those with CAI, to regional PROs and injury history characteristics. Design: Cross-sectional, descriptive. Setting: Sport Medicine Research Laboratory. Participants: Included 45 individuals with CAI and 45 uninjured controls. CAI was defined based on the recommendations of the International Ankle Consortium. Main outcome measures: Two regional PROs (e.g. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), and several generic and psychological PROs (e.g. SF-36, select PROMIS short forms, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). Results: Those with CAI had worse scores, relative to controls, in PROs related to regional function, generic physical function, pain, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and injury related fear. The number of giving way episodes, CAI severity, and regional PROs associated with generic physical function scales as well as a pain scale. Conclusions: Select generic physical function and psychological scales can detect differences between those with and without CAI. Specific injury history characteristics and regional PROs associate with generic and psychological PROs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072282916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072282916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.09.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 31542637

AN - SCOPUS:85072282916

SN - 1873-1600

VL - 40

SP - 137

EP - 142

JO - Physical Therapy in Sport

JF - Physical Therapy in Sport

ER -

Generic and psychological patient-reported deficits in those with chronic ankle instability: A cross sectional study

Abstract

Bibliographical note

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this