Graphite oxides: Effects of permanganate and chlorate oxidants on the oxygen composition

Chun Kiang Chua, Zdeněk Sofer, Martin Pumera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on graphene materials has refocused on graphite oxides (GOs) in recent years. The fabrication of GO is commonly accomplished by using concentrated sulfuric acid in conjunction with: a) fuming nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Staudenmaier); b) concentrated nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Hofmann); c) sodium nitrate for in situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO 4 (Hummers); or d) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO 4 (Tour). These methods have been used interchangeably in the graphene community, since the properties of GOs produced by these different methods were assumed as almost similar. In light of the wide applicability of GOs in nanotechnology applications, in which presence of certain oxygen functional groups are specifically important, the qualities and functionalities of the GOs produced by using these four different methods, side-by-side, was investigated. The structural characterizations of the GOs would be probed by using high resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Further electrochemical applicability would be evaluated by using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry techniques. Our analyses highlighted that the oxidation methods based on permanganate oxidant (Hummers and Tour methods) gave GOs with lower heterogeneous electron-transfer rates and a higher amount of carbonyl and carboxyl functionalities compared with when using chlorate oxidant (Staudenmaier and Hofmann methods). These observations indicated large disparities between the GOs obtained from different oxidation methods. Such insights would provide fundamental knowledge for fine tuning GO for future applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13453-13459
Number of pages7
JournalChemistry - A European Journal
Volume18
Issue number42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Oct 15

Fingerprint

Chlorates
Graphite
Oxidants
Oxides
Oxygen
Chemical analysis
Nitric Acid
Nitric acid
Graphene
permanganic acid
Oxidation
Phosphoric acid
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Sulfuric acid
Nanotechnology
Functional groups
Cyclic voltammetry
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy
Nitrates

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Catalysis
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Organic Chemistry

Cite this

@article{88fdaeb5ad454956802869abe804a810,
title = "Graphite oxides: Effects of permanganate and chlorate oxidants on the oxygen composition",
abstract = "Research on graphene materials has refocused on graphite oxides (GOs) in recent years. The fabrication of GO is commonly accomplished by using concentrated sulfuric acid in conjunction with: a) fuming nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Staudenmaier); b) concentrated nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Hofmann); c) sodium nitrate for in situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO 4 (Hummers); or d) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO 4 (Tour). These methods have been used interchangeably in the graphene community, since the properties of GOs produced by these different methods were assumed as almost similar. In light of the wide applicability of GOs in nanotechnology applications, in which presence of certain oxygen functional groups are specifically important, the qualities and functionalities of the GOs produced by using these four different methods, side-by-side, was investigated. The structural characterizations of the GOs would be probed by using high resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Further electrochemical applicability would be evaluated by using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry techniques. Our analyses highlighted that the oxidation methods based on permanganate oxidant (Hummers and Tour methods) gave GOs with lower heterogeneous electron-transfer rates and a higher amount of carbonyl and carboxyl functionalities compared with when using chlorate oxidant (Staudenmaier and Hofmann methods). These observations indicated large disparities between the GOs obtained from different oxidation methods. Such insights would provide fundamental knowledge for fine tuning GO for future applications.",
author = "Chua, {Chun Kiang} and Zdeněk Sofer and Martin Pumera",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/chem.201202320",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "13453--13459",
journal = "Chemistry - A European Journal",
issn = "0947-6539",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "42",

}

Graphite oxides : Effects of permanganate and chlorate oxidants on the oxygen composition. / Chua, Chun Kiang; Sofer, Zdeněk; Pumera, Martin.

In: Chemistry - A European Journal, Vol. 18, No. 42, 15.10.2012, p. 13453-13459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Graphite oxides

T2 - Effects of permanganate and chlorate oxidants on the oxygen composition

AU - Chua, Chun Kiang

AU - Sofer, Zdeněk

AU - Pumera, Martin

PY - 2012/10/15

Y1 - 2012/10/15

N2 - Research on graphene materials has refocused on graphite oxides (GOs) in recent years. The fabrication of GO is commonly accomplished by using concentrated sulfuric acid in conjunction with: a) fuming nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Staudenmaier); b) concentrated nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Hofmann); c) sodium nitrate for in situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO 4 (Hummers); or d) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO 4 (Tour). These methods have been used interchangeably in the graphene community, since the properties of GOs produced by these different methods were assumed as almost similar. In light of the wide applicability of GOs in nanotechnology applications, in which presence of certain oxygen functional groups are specifically important, the qualities and functionalities of the GOs produced by using these four different methods, side-by-side, was investigated. The structural characterizations of the GOs would be probed by using high resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Further electrochemical applicability would be evaluated by using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry techniques. Our analyses highlighted that the oxidation methods based on permanganate oxidant (Hummers and Tour methods) gave GOs with lower heterogeneous electron-transfer rates and a higher amount of carbonyl and carboxyl functionalities compared with when using chlorate oxidant (Staudenmaier and Hofmann methods). These observations indicated large disparities between the GOs obtained from different oxidation methods. Such insights would provide fundamental knowledge for fine tuning GO for future applications.

AB - Research on graphene materials has refocused on graphite oxides (GOs) in recent years. The fabrication of GO is commonly accomplished by using concentrated sulfuric acid in conjunction with: a) fuming nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Staudenmaier); b) concentrated nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Hofmann); c) sodium nitrate for in situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO 4 (Hummers); or d) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO 4 (Tour). These methods have been used interchangeably in the graphene community, since the properties of GOs produced by these different methods were assumed as almost similar. In light of the wide applicability of GOs in nanotechnology applications, in which presence of certain oxygen functional groups are specifically important, the qualities and functionalities of the GOs produced by using these four different methods, side-by-side, was investigated. The structural characterizations of the GOs would be probed by using high resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Further electrochemical applicability would be evaluated by using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry techniques. Our analyses highlighted that the oxidation methods based on permanganate oxidant (Hummers and Tour methods) gave GOs with lower heterogeneous electron-transfer rates and a higher amount of carbonyl and carboxyl functionalities compared with when using chlorate oxidant (Staudenmaier and Hofmann methods). These observations indicated large disparities between the GOs obtained from different oxidation methods. Such insights would provide fundamental knowledge for fine tuning GO for future applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867191103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867191103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/chem.201202320

DO - 10.1002/chem.201202320

M3 - Article

C2 - 22961662

AN - SCOPUS:84867191103

VL - 18

SP - 13453

EP - 13459

JO - Chemistry - A European Journal

JF - Chemistry - A European Journal

SN - 0947-6539

IS - 42

ER -