Half-dose abdominal CT with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique in children — comparison with full-dose CT with filtered back projection

Minwook Lee, Myung Joon Kim, Kyung Hwa Han, MiJung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Iterative reconstruction can be helpful to reduce radiation dose while maintaining image quality. However, this technique has not been fully evaluated in children during abdominal CT. Objective: To compare objective and subjective image quality between half-dose images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction at iteration strength levels 1 to 5 (half-S1 to half-S5 studies) and full-dose images reconstructed with filtered back projection (full studies) in pediatric abdominal CT. Materials and methods: Twenty-one children (M:F = 13:8; mean age 8.2 ± 5.7 years) underwent dual-source abdominal CT (mean effective dose 4.8 ± 2.1 mSv). The objective image quality was evaluated as noise. Subjective image quality analysis was performed comparing each half study to the full study for noise, sharpness, artifact and diagnostic acceptability. Results: Both objective and subjective image noise decreased with increasing iteration strength. Half-S4 and -S5 studies showed objective image noise similar to or lower than that of full studies. The half-S2 and -S3 studies produced the greatest sharpness and the half-S5 studies were the worst from a blocky appearance. Full and half studies did not differ in artifacts. Half-S3 studies showed the best diagnostic acceptability.Conclusion: Half-S4 and -S5 studies objectively and half-S3 studies subjectively showed comparable image quality to full studies in pediatric abdominal CT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-193
Number of pages6
JournalPediatric Radiology
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Artifacts
Noise
Pediatrics
Radiation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{14a8a10cc5a640faa6f41068d46b5b24,
title = "Half-dose abdominal CT with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique in children — comparison with full-dose CT with filtered back projection",
abstract = "Background: Iterative reconstruction can be helpful to reduce radiation dose while maintaining image quality. However, this technique has not been fully evaluated in children during abdominal CT. Objective: To compare objective and subjective image quality between half-dose images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction at iteration strength levels 1 to 5 (half-S1 to half-S5 studies) and full-dose images reconstructed with filtered back projection (full studies) in pediatric abdominal CT. Materials and methods: Twenty-one children (M:F = 13:8; mean age 8.2 ± 5.7 years) underwent dual-source abdominal CT (mean effective dose 4.8 ± 2.1 mSv). The objective image quality was evaluated as noise. Subjective image quality analysis was performed comparing each half study to the full study for noise, sharpness, artifact and diagnostic acceptability. Results: Both objective and subjective image noise decreased with increasing iteration strength. Half-S4 and -S5 studies showed objective image noise similar to or lower than that of full studies. The half-S2 and -S3 studies produced the greatest sharpness and the half-S5 studies were the worst from a blocky appearance. Full and half studies did not differ in artifacts. Half-S3 studies showed the best diagnostic acceptability.Conclusion: Half-S4 and -S5 studies objectively and half-S3 studies subjectively showed comparable image quality to full studies in pediatric abdominal CT.",
author = "Minwook Lee and Kim, {Myung Joon} and Han, {Kyung Hwa} and MiJung Lee",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00247-014-3105-y",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "188--193",
journal = "Pediatric Radiology",
issn = "0301-0449",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

Half-dose abdominal CT with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique in children — comparison with full-dose CT with filtered back projection. / Lee, Minwook; Kim, Myung Joon; Han, Kyung Hwa; Lee, MiJung.

In: Pediatric Radiology, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 188-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Half-dose abdominal CT with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique in children — comparison with full-dose CT with filtered back projection

AU - Lee, Minwook

AU - Kim, Myung Joon

AU - Han, Kyung Hwa

AU - Lee, MiJung

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Iterative reconstruction can be helpful to reduce radiation dose while maintaining image quality. However, this technique has not been fully evaluated in children during abdominal CT. Objective: To compare objective and subjective image quality between half-dose images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction at iteration strength levels 1 to 5 (half-S1 to half-S5 studies) and full-dose images reconstructed with filtered back projection (full studies) in pediatric abdominal CT. Materials and methods: Twenty-one children (M:F = 13:8; mean age 8.2 ± 5.7 years) underwent dual-source abdominal CT (mean effective dose 4.8 ± 2.1 mSv). The objective image quality was evaluated as noise. Subjective image quality analysis was performed comparing each half study to the full study for noise, sharpness, artifact and diagnostic acceptability. Results: Both objective and subjective image noise decreased with increasing iteration strength. Half-S4 and -S5 studies showed objective image noise similar to or lower than that of full studies. The half-S2 and -S3 studies produced the greatest sharpness and the half-S5 studies were the worst from a blocky appearance. Full and half studies did not differ in artifacts. Half-S3 studies showed the best diagnostic acceptability.Conclusion: Half-S4 and -S5 studies objectively and half-S3 studies subjectively showed comparable image quality to full studies in pediatric abdominal CT.

AB - Background: Iterative reconstruction can be helpful to reduce radiation dose while maintaining image quality. However, this technique has not been fully evaluated in children during abdominal CT. Objective: To compare objective and subjective image quality between half-dose images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction at iteration strength levels 1 to 5 (half-S1 to half-S5 studies) and full-dose images reconstructed with filtered back projection (full studies) in pediatric abdominal CT. Materials and methods: Twenty-one children (M:F = 13:8; mean age 8.2 ± 5.7 years) underwent dual-source abdominal CT (mean effective dose 4.8 ± 2.1 mSv). The objective image quality was evaluated as noise. Subjective image quality analysis was performed comparing each half study to the full study for noise, sharpness, artifact and diagnostic acceptability. Results: Both objective and subjective image noise decreased with increasing iteration strength. Half-S4 and -S5 studies showed objective image noise similar to or lower than that of full studies. The half-S2 and -S3 studies produced the greatest sharpness and the half-S5 studies were the worst from a blocky appearance. Full and half studies did not differ in artifacts. Half-S3 studies showed the best diagnostic acceptability.Conclusion: Half-S4 and -S5 studies objectively and half-S3 studies subjectively showed comparable image quality to full studies in pediatric abdominal CT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939895288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939895288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00247-014-3105-y

DO - 10.1007/s00247-014-3105-y

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 188

EP - 193

JO - Pediatric Radiology

JF - Pediatric Radiology

SN - 0301-0449

IS - 2

ER -