Hemostatic efficacy of hysrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization

Eui Young Choi, Young Guk Ko, Jin Bae Kim, Jihyuk Rhee, Sungha Park, Donghoon Choi, Yangsoo Jang, Won Heum Shim, Sueng Yun Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Here, we evaluate the efficacy of the Clo-Sur PAD™ nonwoven hydrophilic wound dressing (HWD) on hemostasis in an arterial-access site after transradial percutaneous coronary angiography compared with the RadiStop™ compression device (CD). Eighty patients who had undergone transradial coronary angiography with or without intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to the HWD or CD group. The time required to achieve hemostasis was measured, and the incidence of vascular complications was assessed. No significant differences in clinical and procedural characteristics were observed between the HWD group (n = 40) and the CD group (n = 40). A significant reduction in the time required to achieve hemostasis (58.7 ± 32.6 minutes versus 131.3 ± 59.1 minutes; p < 0.001) was associated with the use of HWD. The incidence of vascular complications was similar in both groups (5% for HWD versus 2.5% for CD; p = 0.500). No major complications, such as large hematoma or acute radial occlusion, occurred in the HWD group. In conclusion, HWD represents a safe alternative to the compression method. Hemostasis can be achieved more quickly using HWD, with no increase in access site complications, as compared to CD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-462
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Invasive Cardiology
Volume17
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Hemostatics
Bandages
Catheterization
Wounds and Injuries
Hemostasis
Equipment and Supplies
Coronary Angiography
Blood Vessels
Incidence
Hematoma

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Choi, E. Y., Ko, Y. G., Kim, J. B., Rhee, J., Park, S., Choi, D., ... Cho, S. Y. (2005). Hemostatic efficacy of hysrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization. Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 17(9), 459-462.
Choi, Eui Young ; Ko, Young Guk ; Kim, Jin Bae ; Rhee, Jihyuk ; Park, Sungha ; Choi, Donghoon ; Jang, Yangsoo ; Shim, Won Heum ; Cho, Sueng Yun. / Hemostatic efficacy of hysrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization. In: Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 9. pp. 459-462.
@article{0fb130bbde604c7bae68d4cb4d531610,
title = "Hemostatic efficacy of hysrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization",
abstract = "Here, we evaluate the efficacy of the Clo-Sur PAD™ nonwoven hydrophilic wound dressing (HWD) on hemostasis in an arterial-access site after transradial percutaneous coronary angiography compared with the RadiStop™ compression device (CD). Eighty patients who had undergone transradial coronary angiography with or without intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to the HWD or CD group. The time required to achieve hemostasis was measured, and the incidence of vascular complications was assessed. No significant differences in clinical and procedural characteristics were observed between the HWD group (n = 40) and the CD group (n = 40). A significant reduction in the time required to achieve hemostasis (58.7 ± 32.6 minutes versus 131.3 ± 59.1 minutes; p < 0.001) was associated with the use of HWD. The incidence of vascular complications was similar in both groups (5{\%} for HWD versus 2.5{\%} for CD; p = 0.500). No major complications, such as large hematoma or acute radial occlusion, occurred in the HWD group. In conclusion, HWD represents a safe alternative to the compression method. Hemostasis can be achieved more quickly using HWD, with no increase in access site complications, as compared to CD.",
author = "Choi, {Eui Young} and Ko, {Young Guk} and Kim, {Jin Bae} and Jihyuk Rhee and Sungha Park and Donghoon Choi and Yangsoo Jang and Shim, {Won Heum} and Cho, {Sueng Yun}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "459--462",
journal = "Journal of Invasive Cardiology",
issn = "1042-3931",
publisher = "HMP Communications",
number = "9",

}

Choi, EY, Ko, YG, Kim, JB, Rhee, J, Park, S, Choi, D, Jang, Y, Shim, WH & Cho, SY 2005, 'Hemostatic efficacy of hysrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization', Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 459-462.

Hemostatic efficacy of hysrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization. / Choi, Eui Young; Ko, Young Guk; Kim, Jin Bae; Rhee, Jihyuk; Park, Sungha; Choi, Donghoon; Jang, Yangsoo; Shim, Won Heum; Cho, Sueng Yun.

In: Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Vol. 17, No. 9, 01.09.2005, p. 459-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hemostatic efficacy of hysrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization

AU - Choi, Eui Young

AU - Ko, Young Guk

AU - Kim, Jin Bae

AU - Rhee, Jihyuk

AU - Park, Sungha

AU - Choi, Donghoon

AU - Jang, Yangsoo

AU - Shim, Won Heum

AU - Cho, Sueng Yun

PY - 2005/9/1

Y1 - 2005/9/1

N2 - Here, we evaluate the efficacy of the Clo-Sur PAD™ nonwoven hydrophilic wound dressing (HWD) on hemostasis in an arterial-access site after transradial percutaneous coronary angiography compared with the RadiStop™ compression device (CD). Eighty patients who had undergone transradial coronary angiography with or without intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to the HWD or CD group. The time required to achieve hemostasis was measured, and the incidence of vascular complications was assessed. No significant differences in clinical and procedural characteristics were observed between the HWD group (n = 40) and the CD group (n = 40). A significant reduction in the time required to achieve hemostasis (58.7 ± 32.6 minutes versus 131.3 ± 59.1 minutes; p < 0.001) was associated with the use of HWD. The incidence of vascular complications was similar in both groups (5% for HWD versus 2.5% for CD; p = 0.500). No major complications, such as large hematoma or acute radial occlusion, occurred in the HWD group. In conclusion, HWD represents a safe alternative to the compression method. Hemostasis can be achieved more quickly using HWD, with no increase in access site complications, as compared to CD.

AB - Here, we evaluate the efficacy of the Clo-Sur PAD™ nonwoven hydrophilic wound dressing (HWD) on hemostasis in an arterial-access site after transradial percutaneous coronary angiography compared with the RadiStop™ compression device (CD). Eighty patients who had undergone transradial coronary angiography with or without intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to the HWD or CD group. The time required to achieve hemostasis was measured, and the incidence of vascular complications was assessed. No significant differences in clinical and procedural characteristics were observed between the HWD group (n = 40) and the CD group (n = 40). A significant reduction in the time required to achieve hemostasis (58.7 ± 32.6 minutes versus 131.3 ± 59.1 minutes; p < 0.001) was associated with the use of HWD. The incidence of vascular complications was similar in both groups (5% for HWD versus 2.5% for CD; p = 0.500). No major complications, such as large hematoma or acute radial occlusion, occurred in the HWD group. In conclusion, HWD represents a safe alternative to the compression method. Hemostasis can be achieved more quickly using HWD, with no increase in access site complications, as compared to CD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744465534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744465534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16145231

AN - SCOPUS:27744465534

VL - 17

SP - 459

EP - 462

JO - Journal of Invasive Cardiology

JF - Journal of Invasive Cardiology

SN - 1042-3931

IS - 9

ER -