TY - JOUR
T1 - Hepatitis B virus reactivation in B-cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab
T2 - Analysis from the Asia Lymphoma Study Group
AU - Kim, Seok Jin
AU - Hsu, Chiun
AU - Song, Yu Qin
AU - Tay, Kevin
AU - Hong, Xiao Nan
AU - Cao, Junning
AU - Kim, Jin Seok
AU - Eom, Hyeon Seok
AU - Lee, Joon Hyeok
AU - Zhu, Jun
AU - Chang, Kian Meng
AU - Reksodiputro, Arry Harryanto
AU - Tan, Daryl
AU - Goh, Yeow Tee
AU - Lee, Jejung
AU - Intragumtornchai, Tanin
AU - Chng, Wee Joo
AU - Cheng, Ann Lii
AU - Lim, Soon Thye
AU - Suh, Cheolwon
AU - Kwong, Yok Lam
AU - Kim, Won Seog
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is increasing, as rituximab has become widely used for B-cell lymphoma. Thus, prevention and management of HBV reactivation are important in HBV-endemic areas. Methods Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients and HBsAg-negative/HBV core antibody (HBcAb)-positive patients who received rituximab-containing chemotherapy was investigated by the Asia Lymphoma Study Group via retrospective (n = 340), and the results were compared to cross-sectional analysis with patients who were prospectively monitored in a single institute (n = 127). The goal of the study was to define the frequency of HBV reactivation and the efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis. Results HBV reactivation was found in 27.8% of HBsAg-positive patients (45/162) in the retrospective analysis, being significantly less frequent in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis than those not (22.9%, 32/140 versus 59.1%, 13/22; p < 0.001). Lamivudine was most commonly used (96/162, 59.3%), but more than 20% of HBsAg-positive patients showed breakthrough HBV reactivation. In the cross-sectional analysis, a reduced rate of HBV reactivation occurred for entecavir as compared with lamivudine prophylaxis (6.3% versus 39.3%; p < 0.05). HBV DNA monitoring of HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients in the cross-sectional analysis showed HBV reactivation in only 2.4% of cases. Conclusions This is the largest study of HBV reactivation in patients receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy to date, and we defined the probability of HBV reactivation in an HBV-endemic region.
AB - Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is increasing, as rituximab has become widely used for B-cell lymphoma. Thus, prevention and management of HBV reactivation are important in HBV-endemic areas. Methods Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients and HBsAg-negative/HBV core antibody (HBcAb)-positive patients who received rituximab-containing chemotherapy was investigated by the Asia Lymphoma Study Group via retrospective (n = 340), and the results were compared to cross-sectional analysis with patients who were prospectively monitored in a single institute (n = 127). The goal of the study was to define the frequency of HBV reactivation and the efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis. Results HBV reactivation was found in 27.8% of HBsAg-positive patients (45/162) in the retrospective analysis, being significantly less frequent in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis than those not (22.9%, 32/140 versus 59.1%, 13/22; p < 0.001). Lamivudine was most commonly used (96/162, 59.3%), but more than 20% of HBsAg-positive patients showed breakthrough HBV reactivation. In the cross-sectional analysis, a reduced rate of HBV reactivation occurred for entecavir as compared with lamivudine prophylaxis (6.3% versus 39.3%; p < 0.05). HBV DNA monitoring of HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients in the cross-sectional analysis showed HBV reactivation in only 2.4% of cases. Conclusions This is the largest study of HBV reactivation in patients receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy to date, and we defined the probability of HBV reactivation in an HBV-endemic region.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885184821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885184821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 23910494
AN - SCOPUS:84885184821
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 49
SP - 3486
EP - 3496
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
IS - 16
ER -