Holistic sensemaking: conflicting opinions, creative ideas, and collective intelligence

Bradford Lee Eden, Chaomei Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this work is to introduce a generic conceptual and methodological framework for the study of emergent social and intellectual patterns and trends in a diverse range of senseand decisionmaking activities. Design/methodology/approach The development of the framework is driven by three motivating challenges: capturing the collective intelligence of science, fostering scientific discoveries in science and eScience, and facilitating evidencebased librarianship (EBL). The framework is built on concepts such as structural holes and intellectual turning points, methodologies and techniques for progressive knowledge domain visualization and differentiation of conflicting opinions, and information integration models to achieve coherent transitions between different conceptual scales. Findings Structural holes and turning points are detected and validated with the domain of terrorism research as an example. Conflicting opinions are differentiated in the form of a decision tree of phrases with the greatest information gains. Fundamental issues concerning the reliability of common assumptions across multiple levels of granularity are identified. Knowledge diffusion is studied in terms of information integration between a geographic space and an intellectual space. Research limitations/implications This study characterizes a holistic sensemaking approach with three exemplar themes. Future research is needed to develop theoretical foundations and corresponding techniques to sustain additional themes. Practical implications The work contributes to the practice of improving our understanding of the collective intelligence in science. Originality/value The value of the work is the conceptual and methodological contributions to address various phenomena across micro and macroscopic levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-327
Number of pages17
JournalLibrary Hi Tech
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Sep 11

Fingerprint

intelligence
Terrorism
Decision trees
science
Visualization
librarianship
holistic approach
methodology
knowledge
visualization
Values
terrorism
trend

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{c311d6f2ab5a48c69985927eb9fe017c,
title = "Holistic sensemaking: conflicting opinions, creative ideas, and collective intelligence",
abstract = "Purpose The purpose of this work is to introduce a generic conceptual and methodological framework for the study of emergent social and intellectual patterns and trends in a diverse range of senseand decisionmaking activities. Design/methodology/approach The development of the framework is driven by three motivating challenges: capturing the collective intelligence of science, fostering scientific discoveries in science and eScience, and facilitating evidencebased librarianship (EBL). The framework is built on concepts such as structural holes and intellectual turning points, methodologies and techniques for progressive knowledge domain visualization and differentiation of conflicting opinions, and information integration models to achieve coherent transitions between different conceptual scales. Findings Structural holes and turning points are detected and validated with the domain of terrorism research as an example. Conflicting opinions are differentiated in the form of a decision tree of phrases with the greatest information gains. Fundamental issues concerning the reliability of common assumptions across multiple levels of granularity are identified. Knowledge diffusion is studied in terms of information integration between a geographic space and an intellectual space. Research limitations/implications This study characterizes a holistic sensemaking approach with three exemplar themes. Future research is needed to develop theoretical foundations and corresponding techniques to sustain additional themes. Practical implications The work contributes to the practice of improving our understanding of the collective intelligence in science. Originality/value The value of the work is the conceptual and methodological contributions to address various phenomena across micro and macroscopic levels.",
author = "{Lee Eden}, Bradford and Chaomei Chen",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1108/07378830710820907",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "311--327",
journal = "Library Hi Tech",
issn = "0737-8831",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Holistic sensemaking : conflicting opinions, creative ideas, and collective intelligence. / Lee Eden, Bradford; Chen, Chaomei.

In: Library Hi Tech, Vol. 25, No. 3, 11.09.2007, p. 311-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Holistic sensemaking

T2 - conflicting opinions, creative ideas, and collective intelligence

AU - Lee Eden, Bradford

AU - Chen, Chaomei

PY - 2007/9/11

Y1 - 2007/9/11

N2 - Purpose The purpose of this work is to introduce a generic conceptual and methodological framework for the study of emergent social and intellectual patterns and trends in a diverse range of senseand decisionmaking activities. Design/methodology/approach The development of the framework is driven by three motivating challenges: capturing the collective intelligence of science, fostering scientific discoveries in science and eScience, and facilitating evidencebased librarianship (EBL). The framework is built on concepts such as structural holes and intellectual turning points, methodologies and techniques for progressive knowledge domain visualization and differentiation of conflicting opinions, and information integration models to achieve coherent transitions between different conceptual scales. Findings Structural holes and turning points are detected and validated with the domain of terrorism research as an example. Conflicting opinions are differentiated in the form of a decision tree of phrases with the greatest information gains. Fundamental issues concerning the reliability of common assumptions across multiple levels of granularity are identified. Knowledge diffusion is studied in terms of information integration between a geographic space and an intellectual space. Research limitations/implications This study characterizes a holistic sensemaking approach with three exemplar themes. Future research is needed to develop theoretical foundations and corresponding techniques to sustain additional themes. Practical implications The work contributes to the practice of improving our understanding of the collective intelligence in science. Originality/value The value of the work is the conceptual and methodological contributions to address various phenomena across micro and macroscopic levels.

AB - Purpose The purpose of this work is to introduce a generic conceptual and methodological framework for the study of emergent social and intellectual patterns and trends in a diverse range of senseand decisionmaking activities. Design/methodology/approach The development of the framework is driven by three motivating challenges: capturing the collective intelligence of science, fostering scientific discoveries in science and eScience, and facilitating evidencebased librarianship (EBL). The framework is built on concepts such as structural holes and intellectual turning points, methodologies and techniques for progressive knowledge domain visualization and differentiation of conflicting opinions, and information integration models to achieve coherent transitions between different conceptual scales. Findings Structural holes and turning points are detected and validated with the domain of terrorism research as an example. Conflicting opinions are differentiated in the form of a decision tree of phrases with the greatest information gains. Fundamental issues concerning the reliability of common assumptions across multiple levels of granularity are identified. Knowledge diffusion is studied in terms of information integration between a geographic space and an intellectual space. Research limitations/implications This study characterizes a holistic sensemaking approach with three exemplar themes. Future research is needed to develop theoretical foundations and corresponding techniques to sustain additional themes. Practical implications The work contributes to the practice of improving our understanding of the collective intelligence in science. Originality/value The value of the work is the conceptual and methodological contributions to address various phenomena across micro and macroscopic levels.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49949111825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49949111825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/07378830710820907

DO - 10.1108/07378830710820907

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:49949111825

VL - 25

SP - 311

EP - 327

JO - Library Hi Tech

JF - Library Hi Tech

SN - 0737-8831

IS - 3

ER -