How are they different? A quantitative domain comparison of information visualization and data visualization (2000–2014)

Meen Chul Kim, Yongjun Zhu, Chaomei Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Information visualization and data visualization are often viewed as similar, but distinct domains, and they have drawn an increasingly broad range of interest from diverse sectors of academia and industry. This study systematically analyzes and compares the intellectual landscapes of the two domains between 2000 and 2014. The present study is based on bibliographic records retrieved from the Web of Science. Using a topic search and a citation expansion, we collected two sets of data in each domain. Then, we identified emerging trends and recent developments in information visualization and data visualization, captivated in intellectual landscapes, landmark articles, bursting keywords, and citation trends of the domains. We found out that both domains have computer engineering and applications as their shared grounds. Our study reveals that information visualization and data visualization have scrutinized algorithmic concepts underlying the domains in their early years. Successive literature citing the datasets focuses on applying information and data visualization techniques to biomedical research. Recent thematic trends in the fields reflect that they are also diverging from each other. In data visualization, emerging topics and new developments cover dimensionality reduction and applications of visual techniques to genomics. Information visualization research is scrutinizing cognitive and theoretical aspects. In conclusion, information visualization and data visualization have co-evolved. At the same time, both fields are distinctively developing with their own scientific interests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-165
Number of pages43
JournalScientometrics
Volume107
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Data visualization
visualization
Visualization
trend
Industry
engineering

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{9beab5a8e2de48f6981a42e162ca513d,
title = "How are they different? A quantitative domain comparison of information visualization and data visualization (2000–2014)",
abstract = "Information visualization and data visualization are often viewed as similar, but distinct domains, and they have drawn an increasingly broad range of interest from diverse sectors of academia and industry. This study systematically analyzes and compares the intellectual landscapes of the two domains between 2000 and 2014. The present study is based on bibliographic records retrieved from the Web of Science. Using a topic search and a citation expansion, we collected two sets of data in each domain. Then, we identified emerging trends and recent developments in information visualization and data visualization, captivated in intellectual landscapes, landmark articles, bursting keywords, and citation trends of the domains. We found out that both domains have computer engineering and applications as their shared grounds. Our study reveals that information visualization and data visualization have scrutinized algorithmic concepts underlying the domains in their early years. Successive literature citing the datasets focuses on applying information and data visualization techniques to biomedical research. Recent thematic trends in the fields reflect that they are also diverging from each other. In data visualization, emerging topics and new developments cover dimensionality reduction and applications of visual techniques to genomics. Information visualization research is scrutinizing cognitive and theoretical aspects. In conclusion, information visualization and data visualization have co-evolved. At the same time, both fields are distinctively developing with their own scientific interests.",
author = "Kim, {Meen Chul} and Yongjun Zhu and Chaomei Chen",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-015-1830-0",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "123--165",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

How are they different? A quantitative domain comparison of information visualization and data visualization (2000–2014). / Kim, Meen Chul; Zhu, Yongjun; Chen, Chaomei.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 107, No. 1, 01.04.2016, p. 123-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How are they different? A quantitative domain comparison of information visualization and data visualization (2000–2014)

AU - Kim, Meen Chul

AU - Zhu, Yongjun

AU - Chen, Chaomei

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Information visualization and data visualization are often viewed as similar, but distinct domains, and they have drawn an increasingly broad range of interest from diverse sectors of academia and industry. This study systematically analyzes and compares the intellectual landscapes of the two domains between 2000 and 2014. The present study is based on bibliographic records retrieved from the Web of Science. Using a topic search and a citation expansion, we collected two sets of data in each domain. Then, we identified emerging trends and recent developments in information visualization and data visualization, captivated in intellectual landscapes, landmark articles, bursting keywords, and citation trends of the domains. We found out that both domains have computer engineering and applications as their shared grounds. Our study reveals that information visualization and data visualization have scrutinized algorithmic concepts underlying the domains in their early years. Successive literature citing the datasets focuses on applying information and data visualization techniques to biomedical research. Recent thematic trends in the fields reflect that they are also diverging from each other. In data visualization, emerging topics and new developments cover dimensionality reduction and applications of visual techniques to genomics. Information visualization research is scrutinizing cognitive and theoretical aspects. In conclusion, information visualization and data visualization have co-evolved. At the same time, both fields are distinctively developing with their own scientific interests.

AB - Information visualization and data visualization are often viewed as similar, but distinct domains, and they have drawn an increasingly broad range of interest from diverse sectors of academia and industry. This study systematically analyzes and compares the intellectual landscapes of the two domains between 2000 and 2014. The present study is based on bibliographic records retrieved from the Web of Science. Using a topic search and a citation expansion, we collected two sets of data in each domain. Then, we identified emerging trends and recent developments in information visualization and data visualization, captivated in intellectual landscapes, landmark articles, bursting keywords, and citation trends of the domains. We found out that both domains have computer engineering and applications as their shared grounds. Our study reveals that information visualization and data visualization have scrutinized algorithmic concepts underlying the domains in their early years. Successive literature citing the datasets focuses on applying information and data visualization techniques to biomedical research. Recent thematic trends in the fields reflect that they are also diverging from each other. In data visualization, emerging topics and new developments cover dimensionality reduction and applications of visual techniques to genomics. Information visualization research is scrutinizing cognitive and theoretical aspects. In conclusion, information visualization and data visualization have co-evolved. At the same time, both fields are distinctively developing with their own scientific interests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955616761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955616761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-015-1830-0

DO - 10.1007/s11192-015-1830-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84955616761

VL - 107

SP - 123

EP - 165

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 1

ER -