Ideas, networks, and policy change: Explaining strategic privatization in Korea

Whasun Jho, Taeyoung Yoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship between organizational change in the public sectors of an economy and the coordination traditions of a society. Due to the financial crisis of 1997, many countries in Asia have shifted toward a market-driven economy and private ownership. However, each country selected a different path for their privatization policy and exhibited diverse capacities in pursuing economic reform. The specific case of South Korea, labeled a state-activist economy, illustrates that the scope and scale of privatizations are strategically selected by the government, and that even privatized firms remain strongly influenced by the government. In this paper, we complement the literature by examining two relatively disregarded factors in understanding the heterogeneous response of each economy to privatization, i.e., the ideas of policy-makers and the policy networks between the state and business sectors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-210
Number of pages32
JournalKorea Observer
Volume45
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Korea
privatization
economy
organizational change
economic reform
market economy
South Korea
financial crisis
public sector
firm
Privatization
Economy
Strategic Change
Government
Society
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{2773b1d89acf4410b0842516a424ffcd,
title = "Ideas, networks, and policy change: Explaining strategic privatization in Korea",
abstract = "This paper analyzes the relationship between organizational change in the public sectors of an economy and the coordination traditions of a society. Due to the financial crisis of 1997, many countries in Asia have shifted toward a market-driven economy and private ownership. However, each country selected a different path for their privatization policy and exhibited diverse capacities in pursuing economic reform. The specific case of South Korea, labeled a state-activist economy, illustrates that the scope and scale of privatizations are strategically selected by the government, and that even privatized firms remain strongly influenced by the government. In this paper, we complement the literature by examining two relatively disregarded factors in understanding the heterogeneous response of each economy to privatization, i.e., the ideas of policy-makers and the policy networks between the state and business sectors.",
author = "Whasun Jho and Taeyoung Yoo",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "179--210",
journal = "Korea Observer",
issn = "0023-3919",
publisher = "Institute of Korean Studies",
number = "2",

}

Ideas, networks, and policy change : Explaining strategic privatization in Korea. / Jho, Whasun; Yoo, Taeyoung.

In: Korea Observer, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.06.2014, p. 179-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ideas, networks, and policy change

T2 - Explaining strategic privatization in Korea

AU - Jho, Whasun

AU - Yoo, Taeyoung

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - This paper analyzes the relationship between organizational change in the public sectors of an economy and the coordination traditions of a society. Due to the financial crisis of 1997, many countries in Asia have shifted toward a market-driven economy and private ownership. However, each country selected a different path for their privatization policy and exhibited diverse capacities in pursuing economic reform. The specific case of South Korea, labeled a state-activist economy, illustrates that the scope and scale of privatizations are strategically selected by the government, and that even privatized firms remain strongly influenced by the government. In this paper, we complement the literature by examining two relatively disregarded factors in understanding the heterogeneous response of each economy to privatization, i.e., the ideas of policy-makers and the policy networks between the state and business sectors.

AB - This paper analyzes the relationship between organizational change in the public sectors of an economy and the coordination traditions of a society. Due to the financial crisis of 1997, many countries in Asia have shifted toward a market-driven economy and private ownership. However, each country selected a different path for their privatization policy and exhibited diverse capacities in pursuing economic reform. The specific case of South Korea, labeled a state-activist economy, illustrates that the scope and scale of privatizations are strategically selected by the government, and that even privatized firms remain strongly influenced by the government. In this paper, we complement the literature by examining two relatively disregarded factors in understanding the heterogeneous response of each economy to privatization, i.e., the ideas of policy-makers and the policy networks between the state and business sectors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908155288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908155288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908155288

VL - 45

SP - 179

EP - 210

JO - Korea Observer

JF - Korea Observer

SN - 0023-3919

IS - 2

ER -