TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovas-cular invasion after radical nephroureterectomy
AU - Lee, Kwang Suk
AU - Kim, Kwang Hyun
AU - Yoon, Young Eun
AU - Choi, Kyung Hwa
AU - Yang, Seung Choul
AU - Han, Woong Kyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Korean Urological Association, 2015.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - Results: The study included 344 patients (240 men and 104 women) with a median of 53.9 months of follow-up (range, 1–297 months) after RNU. Tumors were organ confined (T2/N0) in 211 (61.3%) and tumor grade high in 291 (84.6%). AC was administered in 64 patients (18.6%). A total of 280 patients (81.4%) were treated with surgery alone. Patients with LVI tended to be older (p=0.049), have a higher pT stage (pT3/T4, p<0.001), be pN+ (p<0.001), have a high tumor grade (p<0.001), and experience recurrence (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, LVI was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that in the subgroup of patients with LVI, AC was a significant prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; p=0.027 and hazard ratio, 0.50; p=0.025, respectively).Conclusions: AC does not seem to reduce mortality in patients with advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma after RNU. In the subgroup of patients with LVI, AC had a positive impact on cancer-specific survival and overall survival. LVI would be helpful for selecting patients who are appropriate for AC.Purpose: To evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records and clinicopatholgic outcomes of patients (n=552) treated with RNU between 1986 and 2013. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those for whom LVI status was not recorded were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to LVI (n=86) or no LVI (n=256).
AB - Results: The study included 344 patients (240 men and 104 women) with a median of 53.9 months of follow-up (range, 1–297 months) after RNU. Tumors were organ confined (T2/N0) in 211 (61.3%) and tumor grade high in 291 (84.6%). AC was administered in 64 patients (18.6%). A total of 280 patients (81.4%) were treated with surgery alone. Patients with LVI tended to be older (p=0.049), have a higher pT stage (pT3/T4, p<0.001), be pN+ (p<0.001), have a high tumor grade (p<0.001), and experience recurrence (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, LVI was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that in the subgroup of patients with LVI, AC was a significant prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; p=0.027 and hazard ratio, 0.50; p=0.025, respectively).Conclusions: AC does not seem to reduce mortality in patients with advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma after RNU. In the subgroup of patients with LVI, AC had a positive impact on cancer-specific survival and overall survival. LVI would be helpful for selecting patients who are appropriate for AC.Purpose: To evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records and clinicopatholgic outcomes of patients (n=552) treated with RNU between 1986 and 2013. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those for whom LVI status was not recorded were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to LVI (n=86) or no LVI (n=256).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920936506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920936506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.41
DO - 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.41
M3 - Article
C2 - 25598935
AN - SCOPUS:84920936506
SN - 2005-6737
VL - 56
SP - 41
EP - 47
JO - Korean Journal of Urology
JF - Korean Journal of Urology
IS - 1
ER -