Impact of cumulative time on the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasm

Sun Min Lim, Jun Chul Park, Hyuk Lee, Sung Kwan Shin, Sang Kil Lee, Yong Chan Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be technically demanding and requires great attention to detail and prolonged concentration. We assumed that clinical outcomes of ESDs may be affected by cumulative time, and we aimed to compare complete resection rates and adverse events according to cumulative ESD time. Methods: This study involved 1,328 consecutive patients with 1,461 gastric tumors who underwent ESD from January 2008 to July 2011 in a tertiary-care academic medical center. The main outcome measurements were en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, bleeding rate and perforation rate. Results: Patients were divided into three groups according to cumulative time intervals (<2 h vs. 2-4 h vs. ≥4 h). Complete resection rate did not differ among the three groups, but early post-ESD bleeding (EPEB) rate was significantly different among the three groups (2.5 vs. 3.5 % vs. 6.6 %, P = 0.040). In multivariate analysis, cumulative time period was an independent predictor of EPEB (2-4 h odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05-5.01, P = 0.038; ≥4 h OR 3.99; 95 % CI, 2.15-7.65, P < 0.001). The rate of perforation was higher in ESDs performed after completing prior endoscopies or outpatient clinic session compared to those performed without prior work (3.8 vs. 1.6 %, P = 0.004). Moreover, prior workload before ESD was an independent predictor of perforation in multivariate analysis (OR 2.77, 95 % CI, 1.37-5.60, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Our data suggest that cumulative ESD time did not influence en bloc or complete resection rate of ESD, but increased the rate of acute bleeding. Moreover, prior workload before ESDs may increase the risk of perforation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1397-1403
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical endoscopy
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Apr

Fingerprint

Stomach Neoplasms
Hemorrhage
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Workload
Multivariate Analysis
Tertiary Healthcare
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Endoscopy
Stomach
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Lim, Sun Min ; Park, Jun Chul ; Lee, Hyuk ; Shin, Sung Kwan ; Lee, Sang Kil ; Lee, Yong Chan. / Impact of cumulative time on the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasm. In: Surgical endoscopy. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 1397-1403.
@article{9b1175b9ff8f447292fc747e145a6f8d,
title = "Impact of cumulative time on the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasm",
abstract = "Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be technically demanding and requires great attention to detail and prolonged concentration. We assumed that clinical outcomes of ESDs may be affected by cumulative time, and we aimed to compare complete resection rates and adverse events according to cumulative ESD time. Methods: This study involved 1,328 consecutive patients with 1,461 gastric tumors who underwent ESD from January 2008 to July 2011 in a tertiary-care academic medical center. The main outcome measurements were en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, bleeding rate and perforation rate. Results: Patients were divided into three groups according to cumulative time intervals (<2 h vs. 2-4 h vs. ≥4 h). Complete resection rate did not differ among the three groups, but early post-ESD bleeding (EPEB) rate was significantly different among the three groups (2.5 vs. 3.5 {\%} vs. 6.6 {\%}, P = 0.040). In multivariate analysis, cumulative time period was an independent predictor of EPEB (2-4 h odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95 {\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.05-5.01, P = 0.038; ≥4 h OR 3.99; 95 {\%} CI, 2.15-7.65, P < 0.001). The rate of perforation was higher in ESDs performed after completing prior endoscopies or outpatient clinic session compared to those performed without prior work (3.8 vs. 1.6 {\%}, P = 0.004). Moreover, prior workload before ESD was an independent predictor of perforation in multivariate analysis (OR 2.77, 95 {\%} CI, 1.37-5.60, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Our data suggest that cumulative ESD time did not influence en bloc or complete resection rate of ESD, but increased the rate of acute bleeding. Moreover, prior workload before ESDs may increase the risk of perforation.",
author = "Lim, {Sun Min} and Park, {Jun Chul} and Hyuk Lee and Shin, {Sung Kwan} and Lee, {Sang Kil} and Lee, {Yong Chan}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-012-2643-3",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1397--1403",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Impact of cumulative time on the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasm. / Lim, Sun Min; Park, Jun Chul; Lee, Hyuk; Shin, Sung Kwan; Lee, Sang Kil; Lee, Yong Chan.

In: Surgical endoscopy, Vol. 27, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 1397-1403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of cumulative time on the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasm

AU - Lim, Sun Min

AU - Park, Jun Chul

AU - Lee, Hyuk

AU - Shin, Sung Kwan

AU - Lee, Sang Kil

AU - Lee, Yong Chan

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be technically demanding and requires great attention to detail and prolonged concentration. We assumed that clinical outcomes of ESDs may be affected by cumulative time, and we aimed to compare complete resection rates and adverse events according to cumulative ESD time. Methods: This study involved 1,328 consecutive patients with 1,461 gastric tumors who underwent ESD from January 2008 to July 2011 in a tertiary-care academic medical center. The main outcome measurements were en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, bleeding rate and perforation rate. Results: Patients were divided into three groups according to cumulative time intervals (<2 h vs. 2-4 h vs. ≥4 h). Complete resection rate did not differ among the three groups, but early post-ESD bleeding (EPEB) rate was significantly different among the three groups (2.5 vs. 3.5 % vs. 6.6 %, P = 0.040). In multivariate analysis, cumulative time period was an independent predictor of EPEB (2-4 h odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05-5.01, P = 0.038; ≥4 h OR 3.99; 95 % CI, 2.15-7.65, P < 0.001). The rate of perforation was higher in ESDs performed after completing prior endoscopies or outpatient clinic session compared to those performed without prior work (3.8 vs. 1.6 %, P = 0.004). Moreover, prior workload before ESD was an independent predictor of perforation in multivariate analysis (OR 2.77, 95 % CI, 1.37-5.60, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Our data suggest that cumulative ESD time did not influence en bloc or complete resection rate of ESD, but increased the rate of acute bleeding. Moreover, prior workload before ESDs may increase the risk of perforation.

AB - Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be technically demanding and requires great attention to detail and prolonged concentration. We assumed that clinical outcomes of ESDs may be affected by cumulative time, and we aimed to compare complete resection rates and adverse events according to cumulative ESD time. Methods: This study involved 1,328 consecutive patients with 1,461 gastric tumors who underwent ESD from January 2008 to July 2011 in a tertiary-care academic medical center. The main outcome measurements were en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, bleeding rate and perforation rate. Results: Patients were divided into three groups according to cumulative time intervals (<2 h vs. 2-4 h vs. ≥4 h). Complete resection rate did not differ among the three groups, but early post-ESD bleeding (EPEB) rate was significantly different among the three groups (2.5 vs. 3.5 % vs. 6.6 %, P = 0.040). In multivariate analysis, cumulative time period was an independent predictor of EPEB (2-4 h odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05-5.01, P = 0.038; ≥4 h OR 3.99; 95 % CI, 2.15-7.65, P < 0.001). The rate of perforation was higher in ESDs performed after completing prior endoscopies or outpatient clinic session compared to those performed without prior work (3.8 vs. 1.6 %, P = 0.004). Moreover, prior workload before ESD was an independent predictor of perforation in multivariate analysis (OR 2.77, 95 % CI, 1.37-5.60, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Our data suggest that cumulative ESD time did not influence en bloc or complete resection rate of ESD, but increased the rate of acute bleeding. Moreover, prior workload before ESDs may increase the risk of perforation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876294341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876294341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-012-2643-3

DO - 10.1007/s00464-012-2643-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 23233016

AN - SCOPUS:84876294341

VL - 27

SP - 1397

EP - 1403

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 4

ER -