Impact of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy outcomes

SangKil Lee, Tae Il Kim, Sung Jae Shin, Byung Chang Kim, Won Ho Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

GOALS: This large prospective study attempted to analyze the effect of various prior surgery on colonoscopy performance. BACKGROUND: It is generally presumed that colonoscopy in patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is difficult. This difficulty is apparently due to adhesions and anatomic alterations after surgery but the incidence, site, and severity of adhesions are different according to the types of surgery. STUDY: We analyzed completion rate and insertion time in 4089 consecutive colonoscopies in patients with intact colon. RESULTS: The adjusted completion rate for colonoscopy was 96.7%. The mean insertion time was 6.2±4.0 minutes. Not only old age [odds ratio (OR) 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.04, 2.04]] and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 5.82; 95% CI [4.19, 8.09]) but also a surgical history (OR 1.71; 95% CI [1.18, 2.48]) were independent factors associated with procedural incompleteness. Of surgical history, gastrectomy and hysterectomy were significantly associated with procedural incompleteness (P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). Old age (OR 1.48; 95% CI [1.22, 1.79]), female sex (OR 1.22; 95% CI [1.01, 1.48]), constipation as an indication (OR 1.58; 95% CI [1.24, 2.02]), and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 1.46; 95% CI [1.13, 1.88]) were independent factors associated with prolonged insertion time (>10 min), but a surgical history lost statistical power as a predictor for prolonged insertion time in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in insertion time was not substantial, a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is associated with difficulty in colonoscopy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)711-716
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Volume40
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
History
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Gastrectomy
Hysterectomy
Colon
Multivariate Analysis
Prospective Studies
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Lee, SangKil ; Kim, Tae Il ; Shin, Sung Jae ; Kim, Byung Chang ; Kim, Won Ho. / Impact of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy outcomes. In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2006 ; Vol. 40, No. 8. pp. 711-716.
@article{ab00da58c1d1441fa9f63ca7a52d168c,
title = "Impact of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy outcomes",
abstract = "GOALS: This large prospective study attempted to analyze the effect of various prior surgery on colonoscopy performance. BACKGROUND: It is generally presumed that colonoscopy in patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is difficult. This difficulty is apparently due to adhesions and anatomic alterations after surgery but the incidence, site, and severity of adhesions are different according to the types of surgery. STUDY: We analyzed completion rate and insertion time in 4089 consecutive colonoscopies in patients with intact colon. RESULTS: The adjusted completion rate for colonoscopy was 96.7{\%}. The mean insertion time was 6.2±4.0 minutes. Not only old age [odds ratio (OR) 1.46; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) [1.04, 2.04]] and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 5.82; 95{\%} CI [4.19, 8.09]) but also a surgical history (OR 1.71; 95{\%} CI [1.18, 2.48]) were independent factors associated with procedural incompleteness. Of surgical history, gastrectomy and hysterectomy were significantly associated with procedural incompleteness (P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). Old age (OR 1.48; 95{\%} CI [1.22, 1.79]), female sex (OR 1.22; 95{\%} CI [1.01, 1.48]), constipation as an indication (OR 1.58; 95{\%} CI [1.24, 2.02]), and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 1.46; 95{\%} CI [1.13, 1.88]) were independent factors associated with prolonged insertion time (>10 min), but a surgical history lost statistical power as a predictor for prolonged insertion time in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in insertion time was not substantial, a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is associated with difficulty in colonoscopy.",
author = "SangKil Lee and Kim, {Tae Il} and Shin, {Sung Jae} and Kim, {Byung Chang} and Kim, {Won Ho}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00004836-200609000-00010",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "711--716",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology",
issn = "0192-0790",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

Impact of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy outcomes. / Lee, SangKil; Kim, Tae Il; Shin, Sung Jae; Kim, Byung Chang; Kim, Won Ho.

In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, Vol. 40, No. 8, 01.09.2006, p. 711-716.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy outcomes

AU - Lee, SangKil

AU - Kim, Tae Il

AU - Shin, Sung Jae

AU - Kim, Byung Chang

AU - Kim, Won Ho

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - GOALS: This large prospective study attempted to analyze the effect of various prior surgery on colonoscopy performance. BACKGROUND: It is generally presumed that colonoscopy in patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is difficult. This difficulty is apparently due to adhesions and anatomic alterations after surgery but the incidence, site, and severity of adhesions are different according to the types of surgery. STUDY: We analyzed completion rate and insertion time in 4089 consecutive colonoscopies in patients with intact colon. RESULTS: The adjusted completion rate for colonoscopy was 96.7%. The mean insertion time was 6.2±4.0 minutes. Not only old age [odds ratio (OR) 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.04, 2.04]] and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 5.82; 95% CI [4.19, 8.09]) but also a surgical history (OR 1.71; 95% CI [1.18, 2.48]) were independent factors associated with procedural incompleteness. Of surgical history, gastrectomy and hysterectomy were significantly associated with procedural incompleteness (P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). Old age (OR 1.48; 95% CI [1.22, 1.79]), female sex (OR 1.22; 95% CI [1.01, 1.48]), constipation as an indication (OR 1.58; 95% CI [1.24, 2.02]), and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 1.46; 95% CI [1.13, 1.88]) were independent factors associated with prolonged insertion time (>10 min), but a surgical history lost statistical power as a predictor for prolonged insertion time in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in insertion time was not substantial, a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is associated with difficulty in colonoscopy.

AB - GOALS: This large prospective study attempted to analyze the effect of various prior surgery on colonoscopy performance. BACKGROUND: It is generally presumed that colonoscopy in patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is difficult. This difficulty is apparently due to adhesions and anatomic alterations after surgery but the incidence, site, and severity of adhesions are different according to the types of surgery. STUDY: We analyzed completion rate and insertion time in 4089 consecutive colonoscopies in patients with intact colon. RESULTS: The adjusted completion rate for colonoscopy was 96.7%. The mean insertion time was 6.2±4.0 minutes. Not only old age [odds ratio (OR) 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.04, 2.04]] and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 5.82; 95% CI [4.19, 8.09]) but also a surgical history (OR 1.71; 95% CI [1.18, 2.48]) were independent factors associated with procedural incompleteness. Of surgical history, gastrectomy and hysterectomy were significantly associated with procedural incompleteness (P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). Old age (OR 1.48; 95% CI [1.22, 1.79]), female sex (OR 1.22; 95% CI [1.01, 1.48]), constipation as an indication (OR 1.58; 95% CI [1.24, 2.02]), and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 1.46; 95% CI [1.13, 1.88]) were independent factors associated with prolonged insertion time (>10 min), but a surgical history lost statistical power as a predictor for prolonged insertion time in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in insertion time was not substantial, a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is associated with difficulty in colonoscopy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748470964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748470964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004836-200609000-00010

DO - 10.1097/00004836-200609000-00010

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 711

EP - 716

JO - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

JF - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

SN - 0192-0790

IS - 8

ER -