Implementation of best practice for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in an acute care setting

Su Kyoung Chung, Mee Jung Ahn, Jae Yong Yoo, Mona Choi, Na Hyang, So Rah Woo, So Sun Kim, Sun Ah Kim, Eui Geum Oh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is the commonest side-effect for patients undergoing cancer treatment with chemotherapy. These symptoms can lead to nutritional deficiencies, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, and negative impacts on quality of life. However, wide gaps exist between clinician and patient perceptions of nausea and vomiting. Effective communication about these symptoms is essential for proper treatment. We conducted a recent chart review to identify gaps in practice regarding chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting assessment and documentation. Aim: The goal of this project was to improve local practice in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer. Methods: This study used one pre- and two post-implementation audit strategies utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI-PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) module. The study was conducted in the 33-bed oncology ward of a large acute care hospital in Korea from February 2010 to June 2010. To facilitate evidence-based nursing practice, audit-feedback-re-audit cycles strategies were used. The audits included four criteria recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: There were statistically significant improvements in all four criteria. The first post-implementation audit showed that all four audit criteria rated >50% in compliance. At the second follow-up audit, all four audit criteria rated 100% compliance, indicating excellent compliance with best practice. The differences between the pre- and post-data were statistically significant (P < 0.001) for all four audit criteria. Conclusions: The results indicate that the pre- and post-implementation audits are an effective method in improvement of assessment, documentation and evidence-based nursing implementation for cancer symptom management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-38
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Nausea
Vomiting
Evidence-Based Nursing
Drug Therapy
Documentation
Compliance
Nursing Audit
Neoplasms
Evidence-Based Practice
Practice Management
Korea
Dehydration
Malnutrition
Electrolytes
Communication
Quality of Life
Therapeutics
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Chung, Su Kyoung ; Ahn, Mee Jung ; Yoo, Jae Yong ; Choi, Mona ; Hyang, Na ; Woo, So Rah ; Kim, So Sun ; Kim, Sun Ah ; Oh, Eui Geum. / Implementation of best practice for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in an acute care setting. In: International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2011 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 32-38.
@article{755a6ddcbd444b76a2b100ad58c1d0bb,
title = "Implementation of best practice for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in an acute care setting",
abstract = "Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is the commonest side-effect for patients undergoing cancer treatment with chemotherapy. These symptoms can lead to nutritional deficiencies, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, and negative impacts on quality of life. However, wide gaps exist between clinician and patient perceptions of nausea and vomiting. Effective communication about these symptoms is essential for proper treatment. We conducted a recent chart review to identify gaps in practice regarding chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting assessment and documentation. Aim: The goal of this project was to improve local practice in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer. Methods: This study used one pre- and two post-implementation audit strategies utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI-PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) module. The study was conducted in the 33-bed oncology ward of a large acute care hospital in Korea from February 2010 to June 2010. To facilitate evidence-based nursing practice, audit-feedback-re-audit cycles strategies were used. The audits included four criteria recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: There were statistically significant improvements in all four criteria. The first post-implementation audit showed that all four audit criteria rated >50{\%} in compliance. At the second follow-up audit, all four audit criteria rated 100{\%} compliance, indicating excellent compliance with best practice. The differences between the pre- and post-data were statistically significant (P < 0.001) for all four audit criteria. Conclusions: The results indicate that the pre- and post-implementation audits are an effective method in improvement of assessment, documentation and evidence-based nursing implementation for cancer symptom management.",
author = "Chung, {Su Kyoung} and Ahn, {Mee Jung} and Yoo, {Jae Yong} and Mona Choi and Na Hyang and Woo, {So Rah} and Kim, {So Sun} and Kim, {Sun Ah} and Oh, {Eui Geum}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00198.x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "32--38",
journal = "International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare",
issn = "1744-1595",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Implementation of best practice for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in an acute care setting. / Chung, Su Kyoung; Ahn, Mee Jung; Yoo, Jae Yong; Choi, Mona; Hyang, Na; Woo, So Rah; Kim, So Sun; Kim, Sun Ah; Oh, Eui Geum.

In: International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.03.2011, p. 32-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of best practice for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in an acute care setting

AU - Chung, Su Kyoung

AU - Ahn, Mee Jung

AU - Yoo, Jae Yong

AU - Choi, Mona

AU - Hyang, Na

AU - Woo, So Rah

AU - Kim, So Sun

AU - Kim, Sun Ah

AU - Oh, Eui Geum

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is the commonest side-effect for patients undergoing cancer treatment with chemotherapy. These symptoms can lead to nutritional deficiencies, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, and negative impacts on quality of life. However, wide gaps exist between clinician and patient perceptions of nausea and vomiting. Effective communication about these symptoms is essential for proper treatment. We conducted a recent chart review to identify gaps in practice regarding chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting assessment and documentation. Aim: The goal of this project was to improve local practice in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer. Methods: This study used one pre- and two post-implementation audit strategies utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI-PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) module. The study was conducted in the 33-bed oncology ward of a large acute care hospital in Korea from February 2010 to June 2010. To facilitate evidence-based nursing practice, audit-feedback-re-audit cycles strategies were used. The audits included four criteria recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: There were statistically significant improvements in all four criteria. The first post-implementation audit showed that all four audit criteria rated >50% in compliance. At the second follow-up audit, all four audit criteria rated 100% compliance, indicating excellent compliance with best practice. The differences between the pre- and post-data were statistically significant (P < 0.001) for all four audit criteria. Conclusions: The results indicate that the pre- and post-implementation audits are an effective method in improvement of assessment, documentation and evidence-based nursing implementation for cancer symptom management.

AB - Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is the commonest side-effect for patients undergoing cancer treatment with chemotherapy. These symptoms can lead to nutritional deficiencies, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, and negative impacts on quality of life. However, wide gaps exist between clinician and patient perceptions of nausea and vomiting. Effective communication about these symptoms is essential for proper treatment. We conducted a recent chart review to identify gaps in practice regarding chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting assessment and documentation. Aim: The goal of this project was to improve local practice in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer. Methods: This study used one pre- and two post-implementation audit strategies utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI-PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) module. The study was conducted in the 33-bed oncology ward of a large acute care hospital in Korea from February 2010 to June 2010. To facilitate evidence-based nursing practice, audit-feedback-re-audit cycles strategies were used. The audits included four criteria recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: There were statistically significant improvements in all four criteria. The first post-implementation audit showed that all four audit criteria rated >50% in compliance. At the second follow-up audit, all four audit criteria rated 100% compliance, indicating excellent compliance with best practice. The differences between the pre- and post-data were statistically significant (P < 0.001) for all four audit criteria. Conclusions: The results indicate that the pre- and post-implementation audits are an effective method in improvement of assessment, documentation and evidence-based nursing implementation for cancer symptom management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953730963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953730963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00198.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00198.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21332661

AN - SCOPUS:79953730963

VL - 9

SP - 32

EP - 38

JO - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

JF - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

SN - 1744-1595

IS - 1

ER -