Implication of CO2 capture technologies options in electricity generation in Korea

Seungmoon Lee, Jin Won Park, Ho Jun Song, Sanjeev Maken, Tom Filburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper estimates the future mitigation potential and costs of CO2 reduction technology options to the electricity generation facility in Korea. The monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption, membrane separation, pressure swing adsorption, and O2/CO2 input system were selected as the representative CO2 reduction technology options. In order to analyze the mitigation potential and cost of these options, it uses the long-range energy alternative planning (LEAP) framework for setting future scenarios and assessing the technology options implication. The baseline case of energy planning scenario in Korea is determined in a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. A BAU scenario is composed of the current account (2003) and future projections for 20 years. Alternative scenarios mainly deal with the installation planning options of CO2 reduction technology (exogenous capacity, planning time, and existing electric plants). In each alternative scenario analysis, an alternation trend of existing electricity generation facilities was analyzed and the cost of installed CO2 reduction plants and CO2 reduction potential was assessed quantitatively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-334
Number of pages9
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jan 1

Fingerprint

electricity generation
Electricity
Planning
mitigation
cost
energy planning
Costs
alternative energy
Industry
membrane
Membranes
adsorption
Adsorption
planning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Lee, Seungmoon ; Park, Jin Won ; Song, Ho Jun ; Maken, Sanjeev ; Filburn, Tom. / Implication of CO2 capture technologies options in electricity generation in Korea. In: Energy Policy. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 326-334.
@article{4c6eed8d44104fedb20b5b176ac28164,
title = "Implication of CO2 capture technologies options in electricity generation in Korea",
abstract = "This paper estimates the future mitigation potential and costs of CO2 reduction technology options to the electricity generation facility in Korea. The monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption, membrane separation, pressure swing adsorption, and O2/CO2 input system were selected as the representative CO2 reduction technology options. In order to analyze the mitigation potential and cost of these options, it uses the long-range energy alternative planning (LEAP) framework for setting future scenarios and assessing the technology options implication. The baseline case of energy planning scenario in Korea is determined in a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. A BAU scenario is composed of the current account (2003) and future projections for 20 years. Alternative scenarios mainly deal with the installation planning options of CO2 reduction technology (exogenous capacity, planning time, and existing electric plants). In each alternative scenario analysis, an alternation trend of existing electricity generation facilities was analyzed and the cost of installed CO2 reduction plants and CO2 reduction potential was assessed quantitatively.",
author = "Seungmoon Lee and Park, {Jin Won} and Song, {Ho Jun} and Sanjeev Maken and Tom Filburn",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.018",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "326--334",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Implication of CO2 capture technologies options in electricity generation in Korea. / Lee, Seungmoon; Park, Jin Won; Song, Ho Jun; Maken, Sanjeev; Filburn, Tom.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 326-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implication of CO2 capture technologies options in electricity generation in Korea

AU - Lee, Seungmoon

AU - Park, Jin Won

AU - Song, Ho Jun

AU - Maken, Sanjeev

AU - Filburn, Tom

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - This paper estimates the future mitigation potential and costs of CO2 reduction technology options to the electricity generation facility in Korea. The monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption, membrane separation, pressure swing adsorption, and O2/CO2 input system were selected as the representative CO2 reduction technology options. In order to analyze the mitigation potential and cost of these options, it uses the long-range energy alternative planning (LEAP) framework for setting future scenarios and assessing the technology options implication. The baseline case of energy planning scenario in Korea is determined in a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. A BAU scenario is composed of the current account (2003) and future projections for 20 years. Alternative scenarios mainly deal with the installation planning options of CO2 reduction technology (exogenous capacity, planning time, and existing electric plants). In each alternative scenario analysis, an alternation trend of existing electricity generation facilities was analyzed and the cost of installed CO2 reduction plants and CO2 reduction potential was assessed quantitatively.

AB - This paper estimates the future mitigation potential and costs of CO2 reduction technology options to the electricity generation facility in Korea. The monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption, membrane separation, pressure swing adsorption, and O2/CO2 input system were selected as the representative CO2 reduction technology options. In order to analyze the mitigation potential and cost of these options, it uses the long-range energy alternative planning (LEAP) framework for setting future scenarios and assessing the technology options implication. The baseline case of energy planning scenario in Korea is determined in a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. A BAU scenario is composed of the current account (2003) and future projections for 20 years. Alternative scenarios mainly deal with the installation planning options of CO2 reduction technology (exogenous capacity, planning time, and existing electric plants). In each alternative scenario analysis, an alternation trend of existing electricity generation facilities was analyzed and the cost of installed CO2 reduction plants and CO2 reduction potential was assessed quantitatively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36549030719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36549030719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.018

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36549030719

VL - 36

SP - 326

EP - 334

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 1

ER -