In defense of the Morfey-Howell single-point nonlinearity indicator

An impedance-based interpretation

Won Suk Ohm, Kent L. Gee, Brent O. Reichman

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Since the Morfey-Howell Q/S was proposed as a nonlinearity indicator for propagation of intense broadband noise [AIAA J. 19, 986-992 (1981)], there has been considerable debate as to its meaning and utility. Perhaps the most contentious argument against Q/S is about its validity as a single-point nonlinearity indicator: the importance of nonlinearity is often judged by observing cumulative effects over some propagation distance, whereas Q/S is based on a pressure waveform at a single location. Studies to address these criticisms have emerged over the years, most recently by Reichman et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139, 2505-2513 (2016)] in support of Q/S. In this paper, we show that the Burgers equation (from which Q/S was originally derived) can be recast in terms of specific impedance, linear absorption and dispersion coefficients, and normalized quadspectral (Q/S) and cospectral (C/S) densities. The resulting interpretation is that Q/S and C/S represent the additional absorption and dispersion, introduced by the passage of a finite-amplitude wave to the existing linear absorption and dispersion. In other words, a nonlinear wave process alters the apparent material properties of the medium, the extent of which can be used as a single-point indicator of the relative strength of nonlinearity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number045003
JournalProceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Nov 28
Event172nd Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America - Honolulu, United States
Duration: 2016 Nov 282016 Dec 2

Fingerprint

nonlinearity
impedance
Burger equation
propagation
absorptivity
waveforms
broadband
coefficients

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

@article{ac4fb2d638524669b0984192a9198042,
title = "In defense of the Morfey-Howell single-point nonlinearity indicator: An impedance-based interpretation",
abstract = "Since the Morfey-Howell Q/S was proposed as a nonlinearity indicator for propagation of intense broadband noise [AIAA J. 19, 986-992 (1981)], there has been considerable debate as to its meaning and utility. Perhaps the most contentious argument against Q/S is about its validity as a single-point nonlinearity indicator: the importance of nonlinearity is often judged by observing cumulative effects over some propagation distance, whereas Q/S is based on a pressure waveform at a single location. Studies to address these criticisms have emerged over the years, most recently by Reichman et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139, 2505-2513 (2016)] in support of Q/S. In this paper, we show that the Burgers equation (from which Q/S was originally derived) can be recast in terms of specific impedance, linear absorption and dispersion coefficients, and normalized quadspectral (Q/S) and cospectral (C/S) densities. The resulting interpretation is that Q/S and C/S represent the additional absorption and dispersion, introduced by the passage of a finite-amplitude wave to the existing linear absorption and dispersion. In other words, a nonlinear wave process alters the apparent material properties of the medium, the extent of which can be used as a single-point indicator of the relative strength of nonlinearity.",
author = "Ohm, {Won Suk} and Gee, {Kent L.} and Reichman, {Brent O.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1121/2.0000427",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
journal = "Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics",
issn = "1939-800X",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "1",

}

In defense of the Morfey-Howell single-point nonlinearity indicator : An impedance-based interpretation. / Ohm, Won Suk; Gee, Kent L.; Reichman, Brent O.

In: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 045003, 28.11.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - In defense of the Morfey-Howell single-point nonlinearity indicator

T2 - An impedance-based interpretation

AU - Ohm, Won Suk

AU - Gee, Kent L.

AU - Reichman, Brent O.

PY - 2016/11/28

Y1 - 2016/11/28

N2 - Since the Morfey-Howell Q/S was proposed as a nonlinearity indicator for propagation of intense broadband noise [AIAA J. 19, 986-992 (1981)], there has been considerable debate as to its meaning and utility. Perhaps the most contentious argument against Q/S is about its validity as a single-point nonlinearity indicator: the importance of nonlinearity is often judged by observing cumulative effects over some propagation distance, whereas Q/S is based on a pressure waveform at a single location. Studies to address these criticisms have emerged over the years, most recently by Reichman et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139, 2505-2513 (2016)] in support of Q/S. In this paper, we show that the Burgers equation (from which Q/S was originally derived) can be recast in terms of specific impedance, linear absorption and dispersion coefficients, and normalized quadspectral (Q/S) and cospectral (C/S) densities. The resulting interpretation is that Q/S and C/S represent the additional absorption and dispersion, introduced by the passage of a finite-amplitude wave to the existing linear absorption and dispersion. In other words, a nonlinear wave process alters the apparent material properties of the medium, the extent of which can be used as a single-point indicator of the relative strength of nonlinearity.

AB - Since the Morfey-Howell Q/S was proposed as a nonlinearity indicator for propagation of intense broadband noise [AIAA J. 19, 986-992 (1981)], there has been considerable debate as to its meaning and utility. Perhaps the most contentious argument against Q/S is about its validity as a single-point nonlinearity indicator: the importance of nonlinearity is often judged by observing cumulative effects over some propagation distance, whereas Q/S is based on a pressure waveform at a single location. Studies to address these criticisms have emerged over the years, most recently by Reichman et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139, 2505-2513 (2016)] in support of Q/S. In this paper, we show that the Burgers equation (from which Q/S was originally derived) can be recast in terms of specific impedance, linear absorption and dispersion coefficients, and normalized quadspectral (Q/S) and cospectral (C/S) densities. The resulting interpretation is that Q/S and C/S represent the additional absorption and dispersion, introduced by the passage of a finite-amplitude wave to the existing linear absorption and dispersion. In other words, a nonlinear wave process alters the apparent material properties of the medium, the extent of which can be used as a single-point indicator of the relative strength of nonlinearity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044210663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044210663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/2.0000427

DO - 10.1121/2.0000427

M3 - Conference article

VL - 29

JO - Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

JF - Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

SN - 1939-800X

IS - 1

M1 - 045003

ER -